Combining MRI and VEP imaging to isolate the temporal response of visual cortical areas

The human brain has well over 30 cortical areas devoted to visual processing. Classical neuro-anatomical as well as fMRI studies have demonstrated that early visual areas have a retinotopic organization whereby adjacent locations in visual space are represented in adjacent areas of cortex within a visual area. At the 2006 Electronic Imaging meeting we presented a method using sprite graphics to obtain high resolution retinotopic visual evoked potential responses using multi-focal m-sequence technology (mfVEP). We have used this method to record mfVEPs from up to 192 non overlapping checkerboard stimulus patches scaled such that each patch activates about 12 mm2 of cortex in area V1 and even less in V2. This dense coverage enables us to incorporate cortical folding constraints, given by anatomical MRI and fMRI results from the same subject, to isolate the V1 and V2 temporal responses. Moreover, the method offers a simple means of validating the accuracy of the extracted V1 and V2 time functions by comparing the results between left and right hemispheres that have unique folding patterns and are processed independently. Previous VEP studies have been contradictory as to which area responds first to visual stimuli. This new method accurately separates the signals from the two areas and demonstrates that both respond with essentially the same latency. A new method is introduced which describes better ways to isolate cortical areas using an empirically determined forward model. The method includes a novel steady state mfVEP and complex SVD techniques. In addition, this evolving technology is put to use examining how stimulus attributes differentially impact the response in different cortical areas, in particular how fast nonlinear contrast processing occurs. This question is examined using both state triggered kernel estimation (STKE) and m-sequence "conditioned kernels". The analysis indicates different contrast gain control processes in areas V1 and V2. Finally we show that our m-sequence multi-focal stimuli have advantages for integrating EEG and MEG for improved dipole localization.

[1]  A. Dale,et al.  High‐resolution intersubject averaging and a coordinate system for the cortical surface , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[2]  Thom Carney,et al.  Using multi-stimulus VEP source localization to obtain a retinotopic map of human primary visual cortex , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[3]  David Regan,et al.  A frequency domain technique for characterizing nonlinearities in biological systems , 1988 .

[4]  J. Horton,et al.  The representation of the visual field in human striate cortex. A revision of the classic Holmes map. , 1991, Archives of ophthalmology.

[5]  Roger B. H. Tootell,et al.  The advantage of combining MEG and EEG: Comparison to fMRI in focally stimulated visual cortex , 2007, NeuroImage.

[6]  J D Victor,et al.  Fluctuations of steady-state VEPs: interaction of driven evoked potentials and the EEG. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[7]  Justin M. Ales,et al.  Advances in multifocal methods for imaging human brain activity , 2006, Electronic Imaging.

[8]  Thom Carney,et al.  The usefulness of the Laplacian in principal component analysis and dipole source localization , 2005, Brain Topography.

[9]  Erich E. Sutter,et al.  PII: S0042-6989(01)00078-5 , 2001 .

[10]  Xian Zhang,et al.  A principal component analysis of multifocal pattern reversal VEP. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[11]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain: minimum norm estimates , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[12]  C. Schroeder,et al.  Intermodal selective attention in monkeys. I: distribution and timing of effects across visual areas. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[13]  Laurence R. Harris,et al.  Computational Vision in Neural and Machine Systems , 2007 .

[14]  R. B. Pinter,et al.  Nonlinear Vision: Determination of Neural Receptive Fields, Function, and Networks , 1992 .

[15]  S. Klein,et al.  Separating transducer non-linearities and multiplicative noise in contrast discrimination , 2006, Vision Research.

[16]  Erich E. Sutter,et al.  The Fast m-Transform: A Fast Computation of Cross-Correlations with Binary m-Sequences , 1991, SIAM J. Comput..

[17]  J. Victor,et al.  A new statistic for steady-state evoked potentials. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[18]  S. Klein,et al.  The topography of visual evoked response properties across the visual field. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[19]  G. Barnes,et al.  Distinct contrast response functions in striate and extra-striate regions of visual cortex revealed with magnetoencephalography (MEG) , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[20]  K Nakayama,et al.  Rapid assessment of visual function: an electronic sweep technique for the pattern visual evoked potential. , 1979, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[21]  Jeffrey L. Elman,et al.  A novel integrated MEG and EEG analysis method for dipolar sources , 2007, NeuroImage.

[22]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Anatomically Informed Basis Functions for EEG Source Localization: Combining Functional and Anatomical Constraints , 2002, NeuroImage.

[23]  S. Wolfson,et al.  Contrast-response functions for multifocal visual evoked potentials: a test of a model relating V1 activity to multifocal visual evoked potentials activity. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[24]  Thom Carney,et al.  Electrophysiological estimate of human cortical magnification , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[25]  E. Sutter,et al.  M and P Components of the VEP and their Visual Field Distribution , 1997, Vision Research.

[26]  A. James,et al.  Contrast response of temporally sparse dichoptic multifocal visual evoked potentials , 2005, Visual Neuroscience.

[27]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Cortical sources of the early components of the visual evoked potential , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[28]  P. Apkarian,et al.  Multiple spatial-frequency tuning of electrical responses from human visual cortex , 1978, Experimental Brain Research.

[29]  Justin M. Ales,et al.  Methods for quantifying intra- and inter-subject variability of evoked potential data applied to the multifocal visual evoked potential , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[30]  Stanley A Klein.  A local measure for modeling contrast discrimination: Response to Katkov, Tsodyks and Sagi , 2007, Vision Research.

[31]  Peter Dayan,et al.  Theoretical Neuroscience: Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Neural Systems , 2001 .

[32]  G. Glover,et al.  Retinotopic organization in human visual cortex and the spatial precision of functional MRI. , 1997, Cerebral cortex.

[33]  M Wagner,et al.  Improving source reconstructions by combining bioelectric and biomagnetic data. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[34]  B. Lutkenhoner.  Dipole separability in a neuromagnetic source analysis , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[35]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  Creating connected representations of cortical gray matter for functional MRI visualization , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[36]  Don L. Jewett,et al.  Insidious errors in dipole parameters due to shell model misspecification using multiple time-points , 2005, Brain Topography.

[37]  E. Halgren,et al.  Dynamic Statistical Parametric Mapping Combining fMRI and MEG for High-Resolution Imaging of Cortical Activity , 2000, Neuron.

[38]  D. Regan,et al.  Objective evidence for phase-independent spatial frequency analysis in the human visual pathway , 1988, Vision Research.

[39]  I. Bodis-Wollner,et al.  Cortical contrast gain control in human spatial vision. , 1988, The Journal of physiology.

[40]  George Sperling,et al.  A gain-control theory of binocular combination. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  Thom Carney,et al.  Localizing Sites of Activation in Primary Visual Cortex Using Visual-Evoked Potentials and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2006, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[42]  Don M. Tucker,et al.  The spatial resolution of scalp EEG , 2001, Neurocomputing.

[43]  J J Riera,et al.  Evaluation of inverse methods and head models for EEG source localization using a human skull phantom , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[44]  Alex R. Wade,et al.  Geometric and metric properties of visual areas V1 and V2 in humans , 2005 .

[45]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis I. Segmentation and Surface Reconstruction , 1999, NeuroImage.