Lecture-Tutorials in Introductory Astronomy

The Lecture-Tutorials for Introductory Astronomy have been designed to help introductory astronomy instructors actively engage their students in developing their conceptual understandings and reasoning abilities across a wide range of astrophysical topics. The development of the Lecture-Tutorials has been informed by nearly two-decades of research into common learning difficulties students experience when studying astronomy. The results from multiple studies provide evidence that Lecture-Tutorials can help students achieve learning gains well beyond what is typically achieved by lecture alone. Achieving such learning gains requires that an instructor understand how to effectively incorporate the Lecture-Tutorials into his or her course. This chapter provides details into the best practices for the effective integration and implementation of the Lecture-Tutorials - practices that we have developed through years of reflective practice from working with thousands of Astro 101 students and instructors. We also present a case study of how Lecture-Tutorials were used to promote the active engagement of learners in an Astro 101 mega-course enrolling over 700 students. This case study illustrates how the thoughtful implementation of Lecture-Tutorials can result in dramatic learning gains, even in the most daunting instructional environments.

[1]  J. Clement,et al.  Not all preconceptions are misconceptions: finding ‘anchoring conceptions’ for grounding instruction on students’ intuitions , 1989 .

[2]  Lillian C. McDermott,et al.  Millikan Lecture 1990: What we teach and what is learned—Closing the gap , 1991 .

[3]  Edward F. Redish,et al.  Implications of cognitive studies for teaching physics , 1994 .

[4]  Eric Mazur,et al.  Peer Instruction: A User's Manual , 1996 .

[5]  David Arendale,et al.  Supplemental Instruction (SI): Review of Research Concerning the Effectiveness of SI from the University of Missouri-Kansas City and Other Institutions from across the United States. , 1997 .

[6]  P. Black,et al.  Assessment and Classroom Learning , 1998 .

[7]  G. Wiggins,et al.  Understanding by Design , 1998 .

[8]  John Barnett,et al.  Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education , 2003 .

[9]  Ronald K. Thornton,et al.  Interactive Lecture Demonstrations , 2004 .

[10]  J. Thanopoulos Teaching International Business in “Mega”-Classes , 2004 .

[11]  Timothy F. Slater,et al.  Research on a Lecture-Tutorial Approach to Teaching Introductory Astronomy for Non-Science Majors , 2004 .

[12]  Steven Pollock,et al.  Who Is Responsible for Preparing Science Teachers? , 2006, Science.

[13]  Timothy F. Slater,et al.  Development and Validation of the Light and Spectroscopy Concept Inventory , 2006 .

[14]  Edward E. Prather,et al.  Effectiveness of Collaborative Ranking Tasks on Student Understanding of Key Astronomy Concepts , 2006 .

[15]  Liza O'Moore,et al.  Peer Assessment Learning Sessions (PALS): an innovative feedback technique for large engineering classes , 2007 .

[16]  E. Prather,et al.  Development and Application of a Situated Apprenticeship Approach to Professional Development of Astronomy Instructors , 2008 .

[17]  Edward E. Prather,et al.  A national study assessing the teaching and learning of introductory astronomy. Part I. The effect of interactive instruction , 2009 .

[18]  Michael C. LoPresto,et al.  Using the Star Properties Concept Inventory to compare instruction with lecture tutorials to traditional lectures , 2009 .

[19]  Edward E. Prather,et al.  Clickers as Data Gathering Tools and Students' Attitudes, Motivations, and Beliefs on Their Use in This Application , 2009 .

[20]  Steven J. Pollock,et al.  A physics department’s role in preparing physics teachers: The Colorado learning assistant model , 2010 .

[21]  A Study of General Education Astronomy Students' Understandings of Cosmology. Part I. Development and Validation of Four Conceptual Cosmology Surveys , 2011 .

[22]  Timothy F. Slater,et al.  Impact Of Redesigning A Large-Lecture Introductory Earth Science Course To Increase Student Achievement And Streamline Faculty Workload , 2011 .

[23]  Edward E. Prather,et al.  A Study of General Education Astronomy Students’ Understandings of Cosmology. Part V. The Effects of a New Suite of Cosmology Lecture-Tutorials on Students’ Conceptual Knowledge , 2012 .

[24]  Timothy F. Slater,et al.  Development and Validation of the Star Properties Concept Inventory , 2012 .

[25]  Bethany R. Wilcox,et al.  Digital Devices, Distraction, and Student Performance: Does In-Class Cell Phone Use Reduce Learning?. , 2012 .

[26]  Edward E. Prather,et al.  Development of the Newtonian Gravity Concept Inventory , 2013 .

[27]  Michelle K. Smith,et al.  Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  A New Lecture-Tutorial for Teaching about Molecular Excitations and Synchrotron Radiation , 2015, 1509.01726.

[29]  Timothy G. Chambers,et al.  Using graphical and pictorial representations to teach introductory astronomy students about the detection of extrasolar planets via gravitational microlensing , 2016, 1603.06866.

[30]  Paul Strauss,et al.  Peer Instruction A Users Manual , 2016 .

[31]  G. Sinatra,et al.  Meeting students halfway: Increasing self-efficacy and promoting knowledge change in astronomy , 2017 .

[32]  Edward E. Prather,et al.  An item response theory evaluation of the Light and Spectroscopy Concept Inventory national data set , 2017 .