Polarizability Fields for Use in Three-Dimensional Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (3D-QSAR)

Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA), a three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) technique, has proven to be a valuable tool in the field of rational drug design. In its native form, CoMFA utilizes a pseudoreceptor, in the form of a regularly spaced lattice of probe atoms, to characterize the steric and electrostatic properties of a series of mutually superimposed molecules. Statistical analyses are performed in an attempt to correlate changes in these shape and charge related fields to observed differences in biological activities at a given target. Graphical analyses of the resulting "negative receptor images" have been demonstrated to provide insight into the physicochemical requirements of novel ligands. Several groups have previously demonstrated the benefits of additional or alternative fields for these types of analyses. In this report, a novel molecular potential field derived from atomistic contributions to molecular polarizability is presented. Comparison studies will be presented using literature data sets and CoMFA models derived from steric, electrostatic, and polarizability fields. The overall conclusion is that molecular polarizability fields derived from semiempirically determined atomic polarizabilities are highly predictive and graphically descriptive supplements to, and perhaps surrogates for, the standard CoMFA steric and electrostatic fields.

[1]  R. Cramer,et al.  Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA). 1. Effect of shape on binding of steroids to carrier proteins. , 1988, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[2]  S. Safe,et al.  Comparative toxicology and mechanism of action of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans. , 1986, Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology.

[3]  C. Waller,et al.  Modeling the cytochrome P450-mediated metabolism of chlorinated volatile organic compounds. , 1996, Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals.

[4]  G R Marshall,et al.  Three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship of angiotesin-converting enzyme and thermolysin inhibitors. II. A comparison of CoMFA models incorporating molecular orbital fields and desolvation free energies based on active-analog and complementary-receptor-field alignment rules. , 1993, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[5]  Simon K. Kearsley,et al.  An alternative method for the alignment of molecular structures: Maximizing electrostatic and steric overlap , 1990 .

[6]  R. Wade,et al.  New hydrogen-bond potentials for use in determining energetically favorable binding sites on molecules of known structure. , 1989, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[7]  Glen Eugene Kellogg,et al.  HINT: A new method of empirical hydrophobic field calculation for CoMFA , 1991, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[8]  C. Waller,et al.  Comparative molecular field analysis of polyhalogenated dibenzo-p-dioxins, dibenzofurans, and biphenyls. , 1992, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[9]  D. E. Patterson,et al.  Crossvalidation, Bootstrapping, and Partial Least Squares Compared with Multiple Regression in Conventional QSAR Studies , 1988 .

[10]  C. Waller,et al.  Three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationships of dioxins and dioxin-like compounds: model validation and Ah receptor characterization. , 1995, Chemical research in toxicology.

[11]  L. Pedersen,et al.  The polarizability of planar aromatic systems. An application to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB's), dioxins and polyaromatic hydrocarbons , 1983 .