Direct calculation of the surface-to-volume ratio for human cancellous bone.

There are many diseases which cause detrimental changes in the trabecular structure of cancellous bone, leading to mechanical failure of the tissue. One approach to understanding the mechanisms of these diseases is to create idealized models that recreate the morphology of the tissue. This paper presents a partial development of such a model. Further histological methods must be developed before a complete definition of morphologically valid models is possible. In a histological section of cancellous bone, the orientation and length of the trabecular surfaces determine how a line drawn across the bone section will intersect the bone-marrow interface. The distribution of the average length between intersections for a set of parallel lines is defined as the mean intercept length distribution. In this paper, the average surface morphology and volume of the average structure of cancellous bone is determined from an examination of the mean intercept length. The average structure of cancellous bone contains a repeated structural element (SE). As a result, the basic bone structure is analogous to a brick wall made from many similar bricks. For a group of 107 specimens, a strong relationship between structural element volume (SE.V) and bone volume fraction (BV/TV) is demonstrated, SE.V = 0.017 kappa (BV/TV)-2.05 mm3, R2 = 0.93, with kappa a model-dependent constant. For the same specimens, the structural element surface (SE.S) showed the relationship, SE.S = 0.144 kappa (BV/TV)-1.35, R2 = 0.92. As a result of the inverse square dependence of structural element volume on bone volume fraction, it is predicted that cancellous bone strength is inversely proportional to structural element volume.

[1]  H J Gundersen,et al.  Estimation of structural anisotropy based on volume orientation. A new concept , 1990, Journal of microscopy.

[2]  Richard A. Brand,et al.  Biomechanics of diarthrodial joints, volumes I and II , 1991 .

[3]  M. Kleerekoper,et al.  Relationships between surface, volume, and thickness of iliac trabecular bone in aging and in osteoporosis. Implications for the microanatomic and cellular mechanisms of bone loss. , 1983, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[4]  Martin Rb Porosity and specific surface of bone. , 1984 .

[5]  E. Philofsky,et al.  On the measurement of the orientation distribution of lineal and areal arrays , 1969 .

[6]  A. Parfitt Bone histomorphometry: standardization of nomenclature, symbols and units (summary of proposed system). , 1988, Bone.

[7]  S. Goldstein,et al.  The direct examination of three‐dimensional bone architecture in vitro by computed tomography , 1989, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[8]  Savio Lau-Yuen Woo,et al.  Biomechanics of diarthrodial joints , 1990 .

[9]  S. Cowin,et al.  On the dependence of the elasticity and strength of cancellous bone on apparent density. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  W. J. Whitehouse The quantitative morphology of anisotropic trabecular bone , 1974, Journal of microscopy.

[11]  R M Rose,et al.  Trabecular architecture of the human patella. , 1975, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  N L Fazzalari,et al.  Mathematical modelling of trabecular bone structure: the evaluation of analytical and quantified surface to volume relationships in the femoral head and iliac crest. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  S. Goldstein,et al.  Evaluation of a microcomputed tomography system to study trabecular bone structure , 1990, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.