Fiber nonlinearity limitations in ultra-dense WDM systems

Transmission performance of ultra-dense 2.5- and 10-Gb/s nonreturn-to-zero intensity-modulated direct-detection wavelength-division-multiplexing systems in various single-mode fibers is investigated. Fundamental limiting factors and their remedies by using optimum dispersion compensation for periodically amplified systems in C band are presented.

[1]  Kenneth O. Hill,et al.  cw three-wave mixing in single-mode optical fibers , 1978 .

[2]  Nori Shibata,et al.  Phase-mismatch dependence of efficiency of wave generation through four-wave mixing in a single-mode optical fiber , 1987 .

[3]  D. Schadt,et al.  Effect of amplifier spacing on four-wave mixing in multichannel coherent communications , 1991 .

[4]  K. Inoue,et al.  Crosstalk and power penalty due to fiber four-wave mixing in multichannel transmissions , 1994 .

[5]  J. A. Lyle,et al.  Technique for evaluating system performance using Q in numerical simulations exhibiting intersymbol interference , 1994 .

[6]  R. W. Tkach,et al.  Terabit/Second Transmission Experiments A. R. Chraplyvy and R. W. Tkach, Senior Member, IEEE , 1998 .

[7]  Amnon Yariv,et al.  Precise measurement of semiconductor laser chirp using effect of propagation in dispersive fiber and application to simulation of transmission through fiber gratings , 1998 .

[8]  A. Cartaxo Cross-phase modulation in intensity modulation-direct detection WDM systems with multiple optical amplifiers and dispersion compensators , 1999 .

[9]  R. Hui,et al.  Cross-phase modulation in multispan WDM optical fiber systems , 1999 .

[10]  M. Eiselt Limits on WDM systems due to four-wave mixing: a statistical approach , 1999 .

[11]  Alexei N. Pilipetskii,et al.  1800 Gb/s transmission of one hundred and eighty 10 Gb/s WDM channels over 7000 km using the full EDFA C-band , 2000, Optical Fiber Communication Conference. Technical Digest Postconference Edition. Trends in Optics and Photonics Vol.37 (IEEE Cat. No. 00CH37079).

[12]  I. Morita,et al.  Performance comparison between DSB and VSB signals in 20 Gbit/s-based ultra-long-haul WDM systems , 2001, OFC 2001. Optical Fiber Communication Conference and Exhibit. Technical Digest Postconference Edition (IEEE Cat. 01CH37171).

[13]  G. Vareille,et al.  3 Tbit/s (300/spl times/11.6Gbit/s) transmission over 7380 km using C+L band with 25GHz channel spacing and NRZ format , 2001, OFC 2001. Optical Fiber Communication Conference and Exhibit. Technical Digest Postconference Edition (IEEE Cat. 01CH37171).

[14]  S. Norimatsu,et al.  Accurate Q-factor estimation of optically amplified systems in the presence of waveform distortions , 2002 .

[15]  M. Fujiwara,et al.  12.5 GHz spaced 1.28 Tb/s (512-channel x 2.5 Gb/s) super-dense WDM transmission over 320 km SMF using multiwavelength generation technique , 2002, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[16]  Takashi Mizuochi,et al.  A comparative study of DPSK and OOK WDM transmission over transoceanic distances and their performance degradations due to nonlinear phase noise , 2003 .

[17]  S. Stulz,et al.  1.6-Tb/s (160 x 10.7 Gb/s) transmission over 4000 km of nonzero dispersion fiber at 25-GHz channel spacing , 2003, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[19]  H. Louchet,et al.  Analytical model for the performance evaluation of DWDM transmission systems , 2003, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[20]  I. Lyubomirsky,et al.  Interplay of fiber nonlinearity and optical filtering in ultradense WDM , 2003, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.