ARPA-E and DARPA: Applying the DARPA model to energy innovation

ARPA-E offers a new innovation institutional model to meet energy technology challenges. Because it is explicitly based on DARPA, this article reviews the noted DARPA approach in detail. Briefly citing well-known features of DARPA, it explores a number of important features that have not been well discussed in the policy literature on DARPA. These include DARPA’s ability to undertake multigenerational technology thrusts, the synergies it has been able to create through complementary strategic technologies, its ability to build an advocate community, and connections it has built to larger innovation elements downstream from DARPA. It has also taken on incumbent technologies within both DOD and in the private sector, used ties to DOD leadership to press its advances, and supported initial market creation. The article then reviews the new ARPA-E model in detail, commenting first on how ARPA-E has adopted key DARPA approaches. It then discusses new features ARPA-E is adopting, driven by the unique demands of the complex, established energy sector. These include new ways: (1) to sharpen the research visioning, selection and support processes, (2) to build a community of support, important to its political survival, and (3) to implement technologies it supports. In addition, the further DARPA features enumerated above provide potentially useful future guideposts to ARPA-E. The paper closes with a discussion of the difficult technology implementation problems on the “back end” of the innovation system—including demonstrations, test beds, and initial markets. The article posits that both agencies must further address these implementation issues by fostering additional downstream partnerships, including between government and private sector.

[1]  Telecommunications Board Funding a Revolution: Government Support for Computing Research , 1999 .

[2]  Law America COMPETES Act , 2012 .

[3]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Optimizing the Stage-Gate Process: What Best-Practice Companies Do—I , 2002 .

[4]  Clayton M. Christensen The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail , 2013 .

[5]  G. Tassey Rationales and mechanisms for revitalizing US manufacturing R&D strategies , 2010 .

[6]  Jean Fisher,et al.  Dream Machines , 2000 .

[7]  Richard H. Van Atta,et al.  DoD Technology Management in a Global Technology Environment , 2005 .

[8]  G. R. Fong ARPA Does Windows: The Defense Underpinning of the PC Revolution , 2001, Business and Politics.

[9]  D. E. Stokes Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation , 1997 .

[10]  William B. Bonvillian,et al.  Structuring an Energy Technology Revolution , 2009 .

[11]  Paul Collopy,et al.  Science and Technology in Development Environments - Industry and Department of Defense Case Studies , 2003 .

[12]  Taking Covered Wagons East: A New Innovation Theory for Energy and Other Established Technology Sectors , 2009, Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization.

[13]  Vernon W. Ruttan,et al.  Is War Necessary for Economic Growth? Military Procurement and Technology Development , 2006 .

[14]  Warren G. Bennis,et al.  Organizing Genius: The Secrets of Creative Collaboration , 1997 .

[15]  P. Romer Endogenous Technological Change , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[16]  Udayan Gupta Done Deals: Venture Capitalists Tell Their Stories , 2000 .

[17]  John A. Alic,et al.  A new strategy for energy innovation , 2010, Nature.

[18]  V. Ruttan Technology, Growth, and Development: An Induced Innovation Perspective , 2000 .

[19]  Sharon Beder,et al.  Power play. , 1994, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[20]  J. Schumpeter Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1943 .

[21]  K. Malmedal,et al.  Energy Policy Act of 2005 , 2007, IEEE Industry Applications Magazine.

[22]  D. Jorgenson American Economic Growth in the Information Age , 2001 .

[23]  C. Weiss,et al.  Complex, Established “Legacy” Sectors: The Technology Revolutions That Do Not Happen , 2011, Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization.

[24]  G. Pascal Zachary Endless Frontier: Vannevar Bush, Engineer of the American Century , 1997 .

[25]  Willy C. Shih,et al.  Restoring American Competitiveness , 2009 .

[26]  Robert M. Solow,et al.  Growth Theory: An Exposition , 1971 .

[27]  Matt Hourihan,et al.  Lean, Mean and Clean: Energy Innovation and the Department of Defense , 2011 .

[28]  V. Ruttan Is War Necessary for Economic Growth? , 2012 .

[29]  D. Jorgenson Economic growth in the information age , 2002 .

[30]  Eugene Gholz How Military Innovation Works and the Role of Industry , 2011 .

[31]  Richard H Van Atta,et al.  DARPA Technical Accomplishments. Volume 3. An Overall Perspective and Assessment of the Technical Accomplishments of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency: 1958-1990 , 1991 .