Effects related to synchrony and repertoire in perceptions of robot dance

In this work we identify low-level aspects of robot motion that can be exploited to create impressions of agency and lifelikeness. In two experiments, participants view split-screen videos of multiple robots set to music and rate the robots on their dance ability, lifelikeness, and entertainment value. The first experiment tests the impact of the correspondence (or lack thereof) of the robot's motion to the underlying rhythm of the music, and the effect of matching changes in the robot's movement to changes in the music, such as a phrase of vocals or drumming. This motivates a second experiment which more deeply explores the relationships of asynchrony and changes in motion repertoire to participants' perceptions of the lifelikeness of the robot's motion. Findings indicate that perceptions of the lifelikeness of the robot and the quality of the dance can be manipulated by simple changes, such as variation in the repertoire of motions, coordination of changes in behavior with events in the music, and the addition of flaws to the robot's synchrony with the music.

[1]  T. Flash,et al.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[2]  K. MacDorman,et al.  Subjective Ratings of Robot Video Clips for Human Likeness, Familiarity, and Eeriness: An Exploration of the Uncanny Valley , 2006 .

[3]  Marek P. Michalowski,et al.  A dancing robot for rhythmic social interaction , 2007, 2007 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[4]  C. Krumhansl,et al.  Can Dance Reflect the Structural and Expressive Qualities of Music? A Perceptual Experiment on Balanchine's Choreography of Mozart's Divertimento No. 15 , 1997 .

[5]  B. Repp Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of the tapping literature , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[6]  Himalaya Patel,et al.  Baby Steps: A Design Proposal for More Believable Motion in an Infant-Sized Android , 2009 .

[7]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  Synchronization in Social Tasks: Robotic Drumming , 2006, ROMAN 2006 - The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[8]  Tatsuzo Ishida,et al.  A small humanoid robot SDR-4X for entertainment applications , 2003, Proceedings 2003 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM 2003).

[9]  Gil Weinberg,et al.  A leader-follower turn-taking model incorporating beat detection in musical human-robot interaction , 2009, 2009 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[10]  M. Zentner,et al.  Rhythmic engagement with music in infancy , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Kazuhiro Kosuge,et al.  Dance partner robot cooperative motion generation with adjustable length of dance step stride based on physical interaction , 2007, 2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[12]  R. Zatorre,et al.  When the brain plays music: auditory–motor interactions in music perception and production , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[13]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  No fair!! An interaction with a cheating robot , 2010, 2010 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[14]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  Robotic drumming : synchronization in social tasks , 2005 .

[15]  Andy Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS (Ism Introducing Statistical Methods) , 2005 .

[16]  Robert Morris,et al.  Notes on Dance , 1965 .

[17]  Casey Reas,et al.  Processing.org: programming for artists and designers , 2004, SIGGRAPH '04.