Bringing in the users: The role for usability evaluation in eGovernment

Abstract During the last decade, various types of eGovernment evaluations have been proposed. These evaluations have primarily focused on international benchmarking using supply side metrics. Demand for eGovernment has been largely ignored. Recently, this oversight has been recognised, but research in this area is still in its infancy. This paper proposes the use of an already established usability literature from computer science. Advantages of applying usability methods to eGovernment include recognising barriers to use, identifying future development priorities and using already existing methods to assess and compare online offerings. Importantly, the inclusion of and focus on real users also fits with the wider government ideals of greater public participation and strengthening democracy. To highlight the potential of such an approach, we present a case study. Usability methods, such as presented here in a user survey, can develop new insights by expressly targeting different user groups and through open-ended questions. The outcomes of this method are immediately useful for prioritising and undertaking future online development as well as comparing eGovernment provision.

[1]  Jeffrey Rubin,et al.  Handbook of Usability Testing: How to Plan, Design, and Conduct Effective Tests , 1994 .

[2]  Frederick G. Conrad,et al.  Usability testing of world wide web sites , 1997, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[3]  Sushil K. Sharma,et al.  Assessing e-government implementations , 2004, Electron. Gov. an Int. J..

[4]  Brendan Boyle,et al.  E-Government in New Zealand , 2003 .

[5]  Leonidas Anthopoulos,et al.  An Evaluation Framework for E-Government Projects , 2010 .

[6]  Joseph F. Dumas,et al.  A Practical Guide to Usability Testing , 1993 .

[7]  Maria Wimmer,et al.  Applying a Holistic Approach to Develop User-Friendly, Customer-Oriented E-government Portal Interfaces , 2002, User Interfaces for All.

[8]  Mateja Kunstelj,et al.  Evaluating the progress of e-government development: A critical analysis , 2004, Inf. Polity.

[9]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Homepage Usability: 50 Websites Deconstructed , 2001 .

[10]  Burkhard Schafer E-government in the United Kingdom , 2007 .

[11]  Louis B. Rosenfeld,et al.  Information architecture for the world wide web - designing large-scale web sites , 1998 .

[12]  Mateja Kunstelj,et al.  Analysing the Demand Side of E-Government: What Can We Learn From Slovenian Users? , 2007, EGOV.

[13]  E. Ettedgui,et al.  Benchmarking e-government in Europe and the US , 2003 .

[14]  Frank Bannister,et al.  The curse of the benchmark: an assessment of the validity and value of e-government comparisons , 2007 .

[15]  Jan van Dijk,et al.  Explaining the acceptance and use of government Internet services: A multivariate analysis of 2006 survey data in the Netherlands , 2008, Gov. Inf. Q..

[16]  D. West Digital Government: Technology and Public Sector Performance , 2007 .

[17]  Johannes A.G.M. Models of Democracy and Concepts of Communication. , 2000 .

[18]  Ioannis A. Tsoukalas,et al.  Applying participatory design and collaboration in digital public services for discovering and re-designing e-Government services , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[19]  Gino Verleye,et al.  User-centered E-Government in practice: A comprehensive model for measuring user satisfaction , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[20]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability engineering , 1997, The Computer Science and Engineering Handbook.

[21]  Thea van der Geest,et al.  Requirements engineering for e-Government services: A citizen-centric approach and case study , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[22]  Mairéad de Róiste The provision of public planning information and services on the Internet by Irish Local Authorities : a user centric perspective , 2007 .

[23]  J. Glicken Getting stakeholder participation ‘right’: a discussion of participatory processes and possible pitfalls , 2000 .

[24]  Robin Gauld,et al.  Do they want it? Do they use it? The 'Demand-Side' of e-Government in Australia and New Zealand , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[25]  Gerald Pfeifer,et al.  A Citizen's Perspective on Public Sector Information , 2004 .

[26]  David Medyckyj-Scott,et al.  GIS Users Observed , 1996, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[27]  Elisabeth Richard,et al.  Tools of governance , 2005 .

[28]  Marinos Themistocleous,et al.  Evaluating e‐government: learning from the experiences of two UK local authorities , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[29]  Davy Janssen,et al.  If you measure it they will score: An assessment of international eGovernment benchmarking , 2004, Inf. Polity.

[30]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  User-centered e-government: Challenges and benefits for government Web sites , 2006, Gov. Inf. Q..