The evolution of UK sea-level projections

The methods used to generate process-based global and local mean sea-level projections have evolved substantially over the last fifteen years, including improved process understanding, advances in ice-sheet modelling, the use of emulators and further development of high-end scenarios. During this time, two sets of UK national sea-level projections have been generated as part of the UK Climate Projections in 2009 (UKCP09; Lowe et al 2009) and in 2018 (UKCP18; Palmer et al 2018b). UKCP18 presented local mean sea-level projections for the UK coastline for the 21st century rooted in Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) models and in methods used in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fifth Assessment Report (AR5), with an emulator-based methodology to provide extended projections to 2300 (Palmer et al 2018a; 2020). We compare UKCP18 global and local mean sea-level projections with those presented in the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report (AR6, IPCC ). We find the likely range projections (characterising the central two-thirds of the distribution) are broadly similar at 2150 to within 0.1 m, except at Edinburgh, where the maximum difference is 0.22 m under medium emissions. Differences arise due to higher contributions from sterodynamic processes and the Antarctic ice sheet, and higher or lower vertical land movement, in AR6 compared to UKCP18. We also compare high-end sea-level rise estimates, presented in AR6 and UKCP09, finding reasonable global and UK local agreement over the 21st century. We explore future paths for UK sea-level science considering both user needs for information and developments in modelling capability. Future UK sea-level projections would benefit from updated high-end sea-level rise scenarios which extend beyond 2100 and continued efforts to build understanding of observed sea-level change drivers. Alongside close collaboration with user groups this would enhance the utility of local sea-level projections by UK coastal practitioners and decision-makers.

[1]  J. Lowe,et al.  The influence of future weather pattern changes and projected sea-level rise on coastal flood impacts around the UK , 2023, Climatic Change.

[2]  Brodie C. Pearson,et al.  The small scales of the ocean may hold the key to surprises , 2022, Nature Climate Change.

[3]  P. Sayers,et al.  TEMPORARY REMOVAL: Responding to climate change around England's coast - The scale of the transformational challenge , 2022, Ocean & Coastal Management.

[4]  L. C. Allison,et al.  Projections of 21st century sea level rise for the coast of South Africa , 2022, Environmental Research Communications.

[5]  R. Kopp,et al.  The Effect of Wind Stress on Seasonal Sea-Level Change on the Northwestern European Shelf , 2022, Journal of Climate.

[6]  R. Nicholls,et al.  Identifying adaptation ‘on the ground’: Development of a UK adaptation Inventory , 2022, Climate Risk Management.

[7]  J. Gregory,et al.  Evaluation of the Local Sea‐Level Budget at Tide Gauges Since 1958 , 2021, Geophysical Research Letters.

[8]  J. Daron,et al.  Future sea-level rise projections for tide gauge locations in South Asia , 2021, Environmental Research Communications.

[9]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .

[10]  R. Dawson,et al.  Long-term sea-level rise necessitates a commitment to adaptation: A first order assessment , 2021, Climate Risk Management.

[11]  B. Gouldby,et al.  Effective Coastal Climate Services—An End-User Perspective for Resilient Infrastructure , 2021, Frontiers in Marine Science.

[12]  S. Speich,et al.  High-End Scenarios of Sea-Level Rise for Coastal Risk-Averse Stakeholders , 2021, Frontiers in Marine Science.

[13]  Daniel F. Martin,et al.  Projected land ice contributions to twenty-first-century sea level rise , 2021, Nature.

[14]  R. Alley,et al.  The Paris Climate Agreement and future sea-level rise from Antarctica , 2021, Nature.

[15]  S. Hanson,et al.  Integrating new sea‐level scenarios into coastal risk and adaptation assessments: An ongoing process , 2021, WIREs Climate Change.

[16]  J. Gregory,et al.  Projecting Global Mean Sea‐Level Change Using CMIP6 Models , 2021, Geophysical Research Letters.

[17]  Xuebin Zhang,et al.  Reconciling global mean and regional sea level change in projections and observations , 2021, Nature Communications.

[18]  J. Gregory,et al.  Exploring the Drivers of Global and Local Sea‐Level Change Over the 21st Century and Beyond , 2020, Earth's Future.

[19]  Xuebin Zhang,et al.  Regional Dynamic Sea Level Simulated in the CMIP5 and CMIP6 Models: Mean Biases, Future Projections, and Their Linkages , 2020, Journal of Climate.

[20]  J. Lowe,et al.  Dynamical downscaling of unforced interannual sea-level variability in the North-West European shelf seas , 2020, Climate Dynamics.

[21]  S. Williams,et al.  Improved and extended tide gauge records for the British Isles leading to more consistent estimates of sea level rise and acceleration since 1958 , 2020 .

[22]  F. Landerer,et al.  The causes of sea-level rise since 1900 , 2020, Nature.

[23]  J. Tinker,et al.  Improving sea-level projections on the Northwestern European shelf using dynamical downscaling , 2020, Climate Dynamics.

[24]  Christopher J. Smith,et al.  Latest climate models confirm need for urgent mitigation , 2019, Nature Climate Change.

[25]  M. Meinshausen,et al.  Attributing long-term sea-level rise to Paris Agreement emission pledges , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  T. Lenton,et al.  Climate tipping points — too risky to bet against , 2019, Nature.

[27]  T. Howard,et al.  Contributions to 21st century projections of extreme sea-level change around the UK , 2019, Environmental Research Communications.

[28]  Robert J. Nicholls,et al.  Generic adaptation pathways for coastal archetypes under uncertain sea-level rise , 2019, Environmental Research Communications.

[29]  Roger M. Cooke,et al.  Ice sheet contributions to future sea-level rise from structured expert judgment , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  J. Gregory,et al.  Concepts and Terminology for Sea Level: Mean, Variability and Change, Both Local and Global , 2019, Surveys in Geophysics.

[31]  Robert J. Nicholls,et al.  Meeting User Needs for Sea Level Rise Information: A Decision Analysis Perspective , 2019, Earth's Future.

[32]  N. Golledge,et al.  Global environmental consequences of twenty-first-century ice-sheet melt , 2019, Nature.

[33]  A. Stroombergen,et al.  A hybrid process to address uncertainty and changing climate risk in coastal areas using Dynamic adaptive pathways planning, multi-criteria decision analysis & Real options analysis: A New Zealand application , 2019, Sustainability.

[34]  Philip B. Holden,et al.  Revisiting Antarctic ice loss due to marine ice-cliff instability , 2018, Nature.

[35]  Maarten Arnst,et al.  Uncertainty quantification of the multi-centennial response of the Antarctic ice sheet to climate change , 2018, The Cryosphere.

[36]  Rachel James,et al.  Storylines: an alternative approach to representing uncertainty in physical aspects of climate change , 2018, Climatic Change.

[37]  J. Gregory,et al.  Extending CMIP5 projections of global mean temperature change and sea level rise due to thermal expansion using a physically-based emulator , 2018, Environmental Research Letters.

[38]  Kathleen D. White,et al.  Sea Level Change and Coastal Climate Services: The Way Forward , 2017 .

[39]  Christopher,et al.  Evaluating Model Simulations of Twentieth-Century Sea Level Rise. Part I: Global Mean Sea Level Change , 2017 .

[40]  J. Eom,et al.  The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview , 2017 .

[41]  Eric Larour,et al.  Ice Sheet Model Intercomparison Project (ISMIP6) contribution to CMIP6. , 2016, Geoscientific model development.

[42]  A. Abe‐Ouchi,et al.  Fate of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation: Strong decline under continued warming and Greenland melting , 2016 .

[43]  M. R. van den Broeke,et al.  Closing the sea level budget on a regional scale: Trends and variability on the Northwestern European continental shelf , 2016, Geophysical research letters.

[44]  James S. Famiglietti,et al.  Fate of Water Pumped from Underground and Contributions to Sea Level Rise , 2016 .

[45]  R. DeConto,et al.  Contribution of Antarctica to past and future sea-level rise , 2016, Nature.

[46]  D. Sheffield,et al.  The Impact of Children’s Connection to Nature: A Report for the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) , 2016 .

[47]  Gaël Durand,et al.  Potential sea-level rise from Antarctic ice-sheet instability constrained by observations , 2015, Nature.

[48]  N. Golledge,et al.  The multi-millennial Antarctic commitment to future sea-level rise , 2015, Nature.

[49]  Tim Graham,et al.  Global and European climate impacts of a slowdown of the AMOC in a high resolution GCM , 2015, Climate Dynamics.

[50]  W. Peltier,et al.  Space geodesy constrains ice age terminal deglaciation: The global ICE‐6G_C (VM5a) model , 2015 .

[51]  C. Tebaldi,et al.  Probabilistic 21st and 22nd century sea‐level projections at a global network of tide‐gauge sites , 2014 .

[52]  Angelyn W. Moore,et al.  The Antarctica component of postglacial rebound model ICE-6G_C (VM5a) based on GPS positioning, exposure age dating of ice thicknesses, and relative sea level histories , 2014 .

[53]  D. Stammer,et al.  Projecting twenty-first century regional sea-level changes , 2014, Climatic Change.

[54]  Tong Lee,et al.  Evaluation of CMIP5 dynamic sea surface height multi-model simulations against satellite observations , 2014, Climate Dynamics.

[55]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  A new scenario framework for Climate Change Research: scenario matrix architecture , 2014, Climatic Change.

[56]  J. Lowe,et al.  Addressing ‘deep’ uncertainty over long-term climate in major infrastructure projects: four innovations of the Thames Estuary 2100 Project , 2013 .

[57]  H. Hellmer,et al.  Projecting Antarctic ice discharge using response functions from SeaRISE ice-sheet models , 2012 .

[58]  K. Calvin,et al.  The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions from 1765 to 2300 , 2011 .

[59]  M. Tamisiea,et al.  The moving boundaries of sea level change: understanding the origins of geographic variability , 2011 .

[60]  Robert J. Nicholls,et al.  Constructing sea-level scenarios for impact and adaptation assessment of coastal areas: a guidance document , 2011 .

[61]  I. Shennan.  Holocene crustal movements and sea‐level changes in Great Britain , 2010 .

[62]  S. Jevrejeva,et al.  How will sea level respond to changes in natural and anthropogenic forcings by 2100? , 2010 .

[63]  Felix Norman Teferle,et al.  Glacial isostatic adjustment of the British Isles: new constraints from GPS measurements of crustal motion , 2009 .

[64]  Aslak Grinsted,et al.  Reconstructing sea level from paleo and projected temperatures 200 to 2100AD , 2009 .

[65]  Robert J. Nicholls,et al.  Potential Implications of Sea-Level Rise for Great Britain , 2008 .

[66]  Eelco J. Rohling,et al.  High rates of sea-level rise during the last interglacial period , 2008 .

[67]  Giorgio Spada,et al.  SELEN: A Fortran 90 program for solving the "sea-level equation" , 2007, Comput. Geosci..

[68]  T. Wilbanks,et al.  Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2007 .

[69]  M. Noguer,et al.  Climate change 2001: The scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2002 .

[70]  Alexei G. Sankovski,et al.  Special report on emissions scenarios : a special report of Working group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2000 .

[71]  Mike Hulme,et al.  Climate Change Scenarios for the United Kingdom , 1998 .