Myocardial contrast echocardiography with a new calibration method can estimate myocardial viabilityin patients with myocardial infarction

Abstract Objectives We have developed a novel calibration technique applicable for myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE). We assessed the value of this technique in the recognition of myocardial infarction (MI) and its spatial extent, and we also performed a validation study in normal subjects. Background The heterogeneity of contrast intensity (CI) among myocardial segments limits the clinical use of MCE. Methods We performed MCE with a slow-bolus injection of Levovist and recorded end-systolic harmonic power Doppler images at intervals of four heart beats in 15 normal volunteers and 30 patients with MI. We divided the left ventricular (LV) wall into 12 segments and placed the region of interest in the subendocardial region in each segment and in the adjacent LV cavity. We measured calibrated CI (dB) by subtracting the cavity CI from myocardial CI. Results The mean intersegmental difference in myocardial CI was 15.8 dB at baseline, whereas it was reduced to 6.3 dB after calibration (p Conclusions This new calibration method reduces the intersegmental difference in CI in normal subjects. Calibrated CI provides an estimate of persistently akinetic myocardium in patients with MI, and its color-coded mapping is comprehensive and identifies the spatial extent of MI.

[1]  A. DeMaria,et al.  Assessment of Coronary Stenosis Severity and Transmural Perfusion Gradient by Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography: Comparison of Gray-Scale B-Mode With Power Doppler Imaging , 2000, Circulation.

[2]  B. Duling,et al.  Direct measurement of microvessel hematocrit, red cell flux, velocity, and transit time. , 1982, The American journal of physiology.

[3]  F. Bilotta,et al.  Assessment of no-reflow phenomenon after acute myocardial infarction with harmonic angiography and intravenous pump infusion with Levovist: comparison with intracoronary contrast injection. , 2001, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[4]  B. Duling,et al.  Microvascular hematocrit and red cell flow in resting and contracting striated muscle. , 1979, The American journal of physiology.

[5]  G S Kassab,et al.  Morphometry of pig coronary venous system. , 1994, The American journal of physiology.

[6]  A R Jayaweera,et al.  Coronary and myocardial blood volumes: noninvasive tools to assess the coronary microcirculation? , 1997, Circulation.

[7]  P. Grayburn,et al.  Peripheral intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography using a 2% dodecafluoropentane emulsion: identification of myocardial risk area and infarct size in the canine model of ischemia. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  Fernando Otero,et al.  Correlation between myocardial perfusion abnormalities detected with intermittent imaging using intravenous perfluorocarbon microbubbles and radioisotope imaging during high‐dose dipyridamole stress echo , 2002, Clinical cardiology.

[9]  M. Kohno,et al.  Quantitative assessment of coronary stenosis by harmonic power Doppler with a simple pulsing sequence and vasodilator stress in patients. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  G S Kassab,et al.  Topology and dimensions of pig coronary capillary network. , 1994, The American journal of physiology.

[11]  E L Ritman,et al.  Myocardial blood flow estimated by synchronous, multislice, high-speed computed tomography. , 1989, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[12]  O. Kamp,et al.  Accuracy and feasibility of contrast echocardiography for detection of perfusion defects in routine practice: comparison with wall motion and technetium-99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography. The Nycomed NC100100 Investigators. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  M. Kohno,et al.  Assessment of myocardial viability in prior myocardial infarction by intravenous bolus microbubble injection: a new time domain index to estimate regional relative myocardial blood volume. , 2002, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[14]  T. Porter,et al.  Noninvasive identification of acute myocardial ischemia and reperfusion with contrast ultrasound using intravenous perfluoropropane-exposed sonicated dextrose albumin. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  H. Samady,et al.  Detection of myocardial viability by contrast echocardiography in acute infarction predicts recovery of resting function and contractile reserve. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  S. Kaul,et al.  Detection of coronary artery disease with myocardial contrast echocardiography: comparison with 99mTc-sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography. , 1997, Circulation.

[17]  S. Nakatani,et al.  Enhanced methods for visualizing myocardial perfusion with peripheral venous injection of Levovist®: Application of triggered harmonic imaging and triggered harmonic power Doppler imaging techniques , 2000, The International Journal of Cardiac Imaging.

[18]  R. Senior,et al.  Intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography predicts recovery of dysynergic myocardium early after acute myocardial infarction. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  D. Cosgrove,et al.  Quantification of blood flow , 2001, European Radiology.

[20]  K. Schwarz,et al.  Quantitative echo contrast concentration measurement by Doppler sonography. , 1993, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[21]  A. Magalski,et al.  Full-motion pulse inversion power Doppler contrast echocardiography differentiates stunning from necrosis and predicts recovery of left ventricular function after acute myocardial infarction. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[22]  S. Kaul,et al.  Power doppler harmonic imaging: a feasibility study of a new technique for the assessment of myocardial perfusion. , 2000, American heart journal.

[23]  J. Copeland,et al.  Microvascular compression during myocardial ischemia: mechanistic basis for no-reflow phenomenon. , 1994, The American journal of physiology.

[24]  A R Jayaweera,et al.  Basis for detection of stenosis using venous administration of microbubbles during myocardial contrast echocardiography: bolus or continuous infusion? , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[25]  Sanjiv Kaul,et al.  Quantification of Myocardial Perfusion With Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography During Left Atrial Injection of Contrast: Implications for Venous Injection , 1994, Circulation.

[26]  P. Grayburn,et al.  Assessment of myocardial perfusion by harmonic power Doppler imaging at rest and during adenosine stress: comparison with (99m)Tc-sestamibi SPECT imaging. , 2000, Circulation.

[27]  A. DeMaria,et al.  Assessment of right ventricular perfusion after right coronary artery occlusion by myocardial contrast echocardiography. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[28]  C. Visser,et al.  Assessment of Myocardial Reperfusion by Intravenous Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography and Coronary Flow Reserve After Primary Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angiography in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction , 2000 .

[29]  A. Kitabatake,et al.  Lack of Myocardial Perfusion Immediately After Successful Thrombolysis: A Predictor of Poor Recovery of Left Ventricular Function in Anterior Myocardial Infarction , 1992, Circulation.

[30]  A R Jayaweera,et al.  Quantification of myocardial blood flow with ultrasound-induced destruction of microbubbles administered as a constant venous infusion. , 1998, Circulation.