The target decomposition model for renewable energy based on technological progress and environmental value

One of the key aspects of developing a regional renewable energy plan involves incorporating national renewable energy targets into provincial targets whilst including interim phase targets and technology targets. This paper proposes a renewable energy model based on national targets ‘decomposed’ into regional targets that incorporate technological processes and environmental conditions at the individual project level. At the project level, resource potential is allocated into individual projects based on the current technological level. The available resources and renewable energy generation of each project changes as the technology evolves and the environmental conditions change over time. The model can be adjusted according to actual needs of each region; thus policymakers can establish the respective targets for power, heating, oil and gas as well as renewable energy based on the regional context. Overall, the total national target can be decomposed into regional targets and technological targets. This paper proposes long-term regional development targets for renewable energy based on the total supply curve for renewable energy in different periods. Fujian province will be applied as an example to validate the target decomposition model of renewable energy targets of various regions and technologies in China. The model projected that the economic capacity of renewable energy generation in Fujian province for dam hydropower, offshore wind power, onshore wind power, photovoltaic power and waste incineration power is expected to reach 4748MW, 4036MW, 3581MW, 2663MW and 766MW, respectively by 2025. The research result could have wider implications such as achieving GHG emissions reductions targets, addressing environmental concerns, providing high tech jobs within the region and contributing to energy security at the local and national level.

[1]  Yoshiteru Nakamori,et al.  Modeling technological change in energy systems – From optimization to agent-based modeling , 2009 .

[2]  G. C. Bakos,et al.  A new energy planning methodology for the penetration of renewable energy technologies in electricity sector—application for the island of Crete , 2006 .

[3]  Jan Abrell,et al.  Regulating CO2 Emissions of Transportation in Europe: A CGE-Analysis Using Market-Based Instruments , 2009 .

[4]  Jin-Won Park,et al.  Assessment of CO2 emissions and its reduction potential in the Korean petroleum refining industry using energy-environment models , 2010 .

[5]  Roberto Schaeffer,et al.  Potential for reduction of CO2 emissions and a low-carbon scenario for the Brazilian industrial sector , 2010 .

[6]  Wen Hong-jun Comparison and countermeasure study on external costs of nuclear power and coal-fired power , 2005 .

[7]  L. Aydın,et al.  Economic impact of oil price shocks on the Turkish economy in the coming decades: A dynamic CGE analysis , 2011 .

[8]  A. Hainoun,et al.  Formulating an optimal long-term energy supply strategy for Syria using MESSAGE model , 2010 .

[9]  Jiangjiang Wang,et al.  Economic analysis of coal price–electricity price adjustment in China based on the CGE model , 2010 .

[10]  Wenying Chen,et al.  Carbon emission control strategies for China: A comparative study with partial and general equilibrium versions of the China MARKAL model , 2007 .

[11]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  Potential impact of (CET) carbon emissions trading on China’s power sector: A perspective from different allowance allocation options , 2010 .

[12]  Wang Yun-min Analysis and Calculation of Environment Cost in Operation for Coal-fired Power Plant , 2009 .

[13]  Leo Schrattenholzer,et al.  MESSAGE-MACRO: Linking an energy supply model with a macroeconomic module and solving it iteratively , 2000 .

[14]  Rabia Shabbir,et al.  Monitoring urban transport air pollution and energy demand in Rawalpindi and Islamabad using leap model , 2010 .

[15]  Céline Guivarch,et al.  The Resilience of the Indian Economy to Rising Oil Prices as a Validation Test for a Global Energy-Environment-Economy CGE Model , 2009 .

[16]  S. Kahouli-Brahmi Technological learning in energy–environment–economy modelling: A survey , 2008 .

[17]  Socrates Kypreos,et al.  An energy-economic scenario analysis of alternative fuels for personal transport using the Global Multi-regional MARKAL model (GMM) , 2009 .

[18]  Ruud Kempener,et al.  A complex systems approach to planning, optimization and decision making for energy networks , 2008 .

[19]  Pan Ziqiang The external cost of coal power chain in China , 2008 .