The Leader-in-Social-Network Schema: Perceptions of Network Structure Affect Gendered Attributions of Charisma

Charisma is crucially important for a range of leadership outcomes. Charisma is also in the eye of the beholder-an attribute perceived by followers. Traditional leadership theory has tended to assume charismatic attributions flow to men rather than women. We challenge this assumption of an inevitable charismatic bias toward men leaders. We propose that gender-biased attributions about the charismatic leadership of men and women are facilitated by the operation of a leader-in-social-network schema. Attributions of charismatic leadership depend on the match between the gender of the leader and the perceived structure of the network. In three studies encompassing both experimental and survey data, we show that when team advice networks are perceived to be centralized around one or a few individuals, women leaders are seen as less charismatic than men leaders. However, when networks are perceived to be cohesive many connections among individuals, it is men who suffer a charismatic leadership disadvantage relative to women. Perceptions of leadership depend not only on whether the leader is a man or a woman but also on the social network context in which the leader is embedded.

[1]  B. Schyns,et al.  Implicit leadership theory. , 2017 .

[2]  W. Thomas,et al.  The Child in America: Behavior Problems and Programs , 2017 .

[3]  R. Riggio,et al.  Implicit Leadership Theories , 2016 .

[4]  Ajay Mehra,et al.  Imaginary Worlds: Using Visual Network Scales to Capture Perceptions of Social Networks , 2014 .

[5]  R. Bales,et al.  Role Differentiation in Small Decision Making Groups , 2014 .

[6]  Raina A. Brands Cognitive social structures in social network research: A review , 2013 .

[7]  S. Sitkin,et al.  A Critical Assessment of Charismatic—Transformational Leadership Research: Back to the Drawing Board? , 2013 .

[8]  R. Burt,et al.  Social network analysis: foundations and frontiers on advantage. , 2013, Annual review of psychology.

[9]  L. Tiedens,et al.  The fluency of social hierarchy: the ease with which hierarchical relationships are seen, remembered, learned, and liked. , 2012, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  D. Harrison,et al.  Centrality and charisma: comparing how leader networks and attributions affect team performance. , 2011, The Journal of applied psychology.

[11]  Michael D. Buhrmester,et al.  Amazon's Mechanical Turk , 2011, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[12]  Laurie A. Rudman,et al.  When men break the gender rules: Status incongruity and backlash against modest men. , 2010 .

[13]  L. Tost,et al.  Agentic women and communal leadership: how role prescriptions confer advantage to top women leaders. , 2010, The Journal of applied psychology.

[14]  H. Bruch,et al.  An Affective Events Model of Charismatic Leadership Behavior: A Review, Theoretical Integration, and Research Agenda , 2009 .

[15]  David Krackhardt,et al.  Organizational network perceptions versus reality: A small world after all? ☆ , 2008 .

[16]  Ashleigh Shelby Rosette,et al.  The White standard: racial bias in leader categorization. , 2008, The Journal of applied psychology.

[17]  S. Giessner,et al.  "License to Fail": Goal definition, leader group prototypicality, and perceptions of leadership effectiveness after leader failure , 2008 .

[18]  Adam D. Galinsky,et al.  8 Social Hierarchy: The Self‐Reinforcing Nature of Power and Status , 2008 .

[19]  B. Shamir,et al.  Adding fuel to fire: the impact of followers' arousal on ratings of charisma. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[20]  Martin Kilduff,et al.  Erratum to “The ties that lead: A social network approach to leadership” [The Leadership Quarterly 16 (2005) 941–961] , 2006 .

[21]  M. Kilduff,et al.  The ties that lead: A social network approach to leadership , 2005 .

[22]  Richard P. Larrick,et al.  Social network schemas and the learning of incomplete networks. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  Sabine Sczesny Gender stereotypes and implicit leadership theories , 2005 .

[24]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  The Role of Followers in the Charismatic Leadership Process: Relationships and Their Consequences , 2005 .

[25]  A. Diekman,et al.  Dynamic Stereotypes of Power: Perceived Change and Stability in Gender Hierarchies , 2004 .

[26]  A. Eagly,et al.  The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence , 2003 .

[27]  D. Beal,et al.  Cohesion and performance in groups: a meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[28]  Deborah A. Prentice,et al.  What Women and Men Should Be, Shouldn't be, are Allowed to be, and don't Have to Be: The Contents of Prescriptive Gender Stereotypes , 2002 .

[29]  S. Karau,et al.  Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. , 2002, Psychological review.

[30]  Robert G. Lord,et al.  Contextual constraints on prototype generation and their multilevel consequences for leadership perceptions , 2001 .

[31]  Raymond T. Sparrowe,et al.  Social Networks and the Performance of Individuals and Groups , 2001 .

[32]  Robert G. Lord,et al.  Thinking outside the box by looking inside the box: Extending the cognitive revolution in leadership research , 2000 .

[33]  B. Avolio,et al.  Opening the black box: An experimental investigation of the mediating effects of trust and value congruence on transformational and transactional leadership. , 2000 .

[34]  R. N. Kanungo,et al.  Charismatic leadership and follower effects , 2000 .

[35]  B. Bass Two Decades of Research and Development in Transformational Leadership , 1999 .

[36]  Roel Bosker,et al.  Multilevel analysis : an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling , 1999 .

[37]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Social Networks and Perceptions of Intergroup Conflict: The Role of Negative Relationships and Third Parties , 1998 .

[38]  G. Graen,et al.  Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective , 1995 .

[39]  S. Karau,et al.  Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: a meta-analysis. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[40]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[41]  Ronald S. Burt,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. , 1994 .

[42]  D. Moskowitz,et al.  Situational influences on gender differences in agency and communion. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[43]  Chris Argyris,et al.  Knowledge for Action: A Guide to Overcoming Barriers to Organizational Change , 1993 .

[44]  Mark W. Baldwin,et al.  Relational schemas and the processing of social information. , 1992 .

[45]  H. Ibarra Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. , 1992 .

[46]  B. Shamir Attribution of Influence and Charisma to the Leader: The Romance of Leadership Revisited1 , 1992 .

[47]  A. Eagly,et al.  Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. , 1992 .

[48]  D. Forsyth,et al.  The Effects of Prototype-Based Biases on Leadership Appraisals , 1991 .

[49]  F. Yammarino,et al.  Operationalizing charismatic leadership using a levels-of-analysis framework , 1990 .

[50]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors , 1990 .

[51]  E. Maccoby,et al.  Gender and relationships. A developmental account. , 1990, The American psychologist.

[52]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[53]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS, AND UNDERSTANDING , 1988 .

[54]  R. N. Kanungo,et al.  Toward a Behavioral Theory of Charismatic Leadership in Organizational Settings , 1987 .

[55]  David Krackhardt,et al.  Cognitive social structures , 1987 .

[56]  L. Freeman,et al.  Cognitive Structure and Informant Accuracy , 1987 .

[57]  Bernard M. Bass,et al.  Leadership: Good, better, best. , 1985 .

[58]  Roseanne J. Foti,et al.  A test of leadership categorization theory: Internal structure, information processing, and leadership perceptions , 1984 .

[59]  A. Eagly,et al.  Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles , 1984 .

[60]  W. Mischel,et al.  Prototypes in Person Perception1 , 1979 .

[61]  L. Freeman Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[62]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: an inquiry into human knowledge structures , 1978 .

[63]  B. Meeker,et al.  Sex roles and interpersonal behavior in task-oriented groups. , 1977, American sociological review.

[64]  E. Aries,et al.  Interaction Patterns and Themes of Male, Female, and Mixed Groups , 1976 .

[65]  U. Neisser Cognition and reality: principles and implications , 1976 .

[66]  U. Neisser Cognition and reality: principles and implications , 1976 .

[67]  V. E. Schein The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics. , 1973, The Journal of applied psychology.

[68]  C. Mills,et al.  The Theory of Social and Economic Organization , 1948 .

[69]  A. K. Geddes,et al.  The Child in America: Behavior Problems and Programs. , 1929 .