Evaluation in Design-Oriented Research

Design has been recognized for a long time both as art and as science. In the sixties of the previous century design-oriented research began to draw the attention of scientific researchers and methodologists, not only in technical engineering but also in the social sciences. However, a rather limited methodology for design-oriented research has been developed, especially as to the social sciences. In this article we introduce evaluation methodology and research methodology as a systematic input in the process of designing. A designing cycle is formulated with six stages, and for each of these stages operations, guidelines and criteria for evaluation are defined. All this may be used for a considerable improvement of the process and product of designing.

[1]  Murray Silverstein,et al.  A Pattern Language , 1977 .

[2]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[3]  Piet Verschuren,et al.  Case study as a research strategy: Some ambiguities and opportunities , 2003 .

[4]  Peter Constable,et al.  DSDM: Dynamic Systems Development Method: The Method in Practice , 1997 .

[5]  Christopher Alexander Notes on the Synthesis of Form , 1964 .

[6]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Engineering Design Methods: Strategies for Product Design , 1994 .

[7]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .

[8]  Gunnar Abrahamson,et al.  Terminology for model credibility , 1980 .

[9]  I. A. Chaikovsky,et al.  Terminology for model credibility , 1979 .

[10]  Terry Halpin,et al.  Conceptual Schema and Relational Database Design , 1995 .

[11]  Earl R. Babbie,et al.  The practice of social research , 1969 .

[12]  B. Chandrasekaran,et al.  Design Problem Solving: A Task Analysis , 1990, AI Mag..

[13]  Sally Sieloff Magnan,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 1997 .

[14]  Max Jacobson,et al.  A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction , 1981 .

[15]  Michael Quinn Patton,et al.  Utilization-focused evaluation: The new century text (3rd ed.). , 1997 .

[16]  S. Dasgupta Technology and Creativity , 2006, Woman with a Movie Camera.

[17]  Subrata Dasgupta,et al.  Design theory and computer science: processes and methodology of computer systems design , 1991 .

[18]  Lawrence B. Mohr Impact analysis for program evaluation , 1988 .

[19]  Morris Asimow,et al.  Introduction to design , 1962 .

[20]  Ivar Jacobson,et al.  The unified modeling language reference manual , 2010 .

[21]  Subrata Dasgupta Design Theory and Computer Science: The Theory of Plausible Designs , 1991 .

[22]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[23]  P.J.M. Verschuren Holism versus Reductionism in Modern Social Science Research , 2001 .

[24]  N. Denzin,et al.  Handbook of Qualitative Research , 1994 .

[25]  Subrata Dasgupta Design Theory and Computer Science: Design Paradigms , 1991 .

[26]  Christopher Alexander,et al.  The Timeless Way of Building , 1979 .

[27]  Susan Carlson Skalak House of Quality , 2002 .

[28]  Ralph Johnson,et al.  design patterns elements of reusable object oriented software , 2019 .

[29]  Ivar Jacobson,et al.  The Unified Modeling Language User Guide , 1998, J. Database Manag..

[30]  Subrata Dasgupta,et al.  Design Theory and Computer Science , 1992, IEEE Expert.

[31]  Laszlo Zsolnai,et al.  Norms, goals, and stakeholders in program evaluation , 1998 .

[32]  Martin H. Levinson Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention , 1997 .

[33]  M. Patton Utilization-focused evaluation: The new century text , 1997 .

[34]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 1997 .

[35]  Matthijs Dekker,et al.  Quality function deployment in the food industry: a review , 2000 .

[36]  Mark W. Lipsey,et al.  Evaluation: A Systematic Approach , 1979 .