Sowing date and boll position affected boll weight, fiber quality and fiber physiological parameters in two cotton (Gossypium Hirsutum L.) cultivars

To study the effects of sowing date and boll position on fiber quality and the physiological mechanism, field experiments were conducted using two cotton cultivars (Kemian 1 and Sumian 15) with two sowing dates (normal sowing date 25 April, and late sowing date 25 May) at Nanjing (118°50′E, 32°02′N), Jiangsu, China, in 2006 and 2007. Cotton bolls were divided into three parts (low, middle and upper) according to the fruiting branch symbodial positions. Boll weight, fiber quality (bundle strength, span lengths, micronaire), and fiber physiological parameters (cellulose content, callose content, and sucrose transformation rate) were detected, respectively. Boll weight and fiber strength were affected by sowing date, boll position, and sowing date × boll position. Comparing to the normal sowing date, late sowing date declined boll weight, fiber strength, cellulose content, and sucrose transformation rate. The cellulose content and sucrose transformation rate changed with boll position, and consequently resulted in the change of boll weight and fiber strength. In normal sowing date, cotton boll in middle positional sympodial branch had the highest cellulose content, sucrose transformation rate, boll weight, and fiber strength. In late sowing date, cotton boll in low positional sympodial branch had the highest cellulose content, boll weight and fiber quality. The results indicated that the change of fiber yield and quality in sowing dates and boll positions were because the synthesis of cellulose, callose and sucrose were changed. Increasing the cellulose content and sucrose transformation rate can improve yield and fiber quality in late sowing date or sub-optimal environmental conditions.

[1]  N. Xu,et al.  Sucrose metabolism in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) fibre under low temperature during fibre development , 2009 .

[2]  Zhiguo Zhou,et al.  Genotypic differences in some physiological characteristics during cotton fiber thickening and its influence on fiber strength , 2009, Acta Physiologiae Plantarum.

[3]  N. Xu,et al.  The rate of cellulose increase is highly related to cotton fibre strength and is significantly determined by its genetic background and boll period temperature , 2009, Plant Growth Regulation.

[4]  A. Hund,et al.  Cold tolerance of maize seedlings as determined by root morphology and photosynthetic traits , 2008 .

[5]  Wei Tang,et al.  Yield, quality and leaf senescence of cotton grown at varying planting dates and plant densities in the Yellow River Valley of China , 2006 .

[6]  C. Haigler,et al.  Cool temperature hinders flux from glucose to sucrose during cellulose synthesis in secondary wall stage cotton fibers , 2004 .

[7]  Markus Pauly,et al.  Glycosyltransferases and cell wall biosynthesis: novel players and insights. , 2004, Current opinion in plant biology.

[8]  M. Bange,et al.  Growth and dry matter partitioning of diverse cotton genotypes , 2004 .

[9]  V. Lozovaya,et al.  Regulation of Callose Metabolism in Higher Plant Cells in vitro , 2002, Russian Journal of Plant Physiology.

[10]  D. Delmer,et al.  Carbon partitioning to cellulose synthesis , 2001, Plant Molecular Biology.

[11]  C. Yucel,et al.  Different planting date and potassium fertility effects on cotton yield and fiber properties in the Çukurova region, Turkey , 2002 .

[12]  C. Hocart,et al.  Towards the mechanism of cellulose synthesis. , 2002, Trends in plant science.

[13]  V. Thaker,et al.  Physiological and biochemical changes associated with cotton fiber development: IX. Role of IAA and PAA , 2002 .

[14]  S. Shi Effect of Anthesis Date and Fruiting Branches on Cotton Fiber Qualities and Super-molecular Structure , 2002 .

[15]  D. Delmer,et al.  The regulation of metabolic flux to cellulose, a major sink for carbon in plants. , 2002, Metabolic engineering.

[16]  H. J. Kim,et al.  Cotton fiber growth in planta and in vitro. Models for plant cell elongation and cell wall biogenesis. , 2001, Plant physiology.

[17]  W. Pettigrew Environmental Effects on Cotton Fiber Carbohydrate Concentration and Quality , 2001 .

[18]  R. Brown,et al.  Cellulose synthases and related enzymes. , 2000, Current opinion in plant biology.

[19]  A. M. Stewart,et al.  Boll openers in cotton: effectiveness and environmental influences , 2000 .

[20]  D. E. Evans,et al.  Canopy Photosynthesis and Fiber Properties of Normal- and Late-Planted Cotton , 2000 .

[21]  V. Thaker,et al.  Physiological and biochemical changes associated with cotton fibre development , 1982, Acta Physiologiae Plantarum.

[22]  A. Liakatas,et al.  Controlled-temperature effects on cotton yield and fibre properties , 1998, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[23]  G. F. Sassenrath-Cole,et al.  Quantitation of cotton fibre-quality variations arising from boll and plant growth environments , 1997 .

[24]  R. Baschetti Sucrose metabolism. , 1997, The New Zealand medical journal.

[25]  P. Porter,et al.  Cotton cultivar response to planting date on the southeastern coastal plain , 1996 .

[26]  D. Delmer,et al.  Cellulose biosynthesis. , 1995, The Plant cell.

[27]  D. Hendrix Rapid Extraction and Analysis of Nonstructural Carbohydrates in Plant Tissues , 1993 .

[28]  H. Kauss,et al.  Chitosan-elicited callose synthesis in soybean cells as a ca-dependent process. , 1985, Plant physiology.

[29]  D. Updegraff Semimicro determination of cellulose in biological materials. , 1969, Analytical biochemistry.