Emergent states in virtual teams: a complex adaptive systems perspective

Research on virtual teams (VTs) has proliferated in the last decades. However, few clear and consistent theoretical attempts to integrate the literature on VTs in a systemic way have emerged. This paper uses the complex adaptive systems (CAS) perspective to integrate the literature on emergent states in VTs. According to this general framework, VT effectiveness depends on the interaction between three levels of dynamics: local, global and contextual. Team cognition, trust, cohesion and conflict are described as states that emerge from the interactions among the VT members and as parts of global dynamics, they impact on VT effectiveness, and in the same time they are influenced by the outcomes of the VT. The insights on this bidirectional causality as well as other benefits of using the CAS framework to improve our understanding of VTs are discussed in the paper. It also provides an overview of artificial simulation models as well as simulation results concerning the emergence of the four states described in the CAS framework and discusses several ways to improve the accuracy of the simulation models using empirical data collected in real VTs.

[1]  L. Festinger.  Informal social communication. , 1950, Psychological review.

[2]  J J Hopfield,et al.  Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  R. Daft,et al.  Information Richness. A New Approach to Managerial Behavior and Organization Design , 1983 .

[4]  D. L. Gladstein.  Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. , 1984 .

[5]  G. Stasser,et al.  Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion , 1985 .

[6]  Thomas R. Hensley,et al.  Victims of Groupthink , 1986 .

[7]  S. R. Hiltz,et al.  Experiments in group decision making: Communication process and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences. , 1986 .

[8]  G. Stasser,et al.  Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on the dissemination of unshared information during group discussion. , 1987 .

[9]  J. Hackman,et al.  The design of work teams , 1987 .

[10]  Charles R. Schwenk,et al.  A meta‐analysis on the comparative effectiveness of devil's advocacy and dialectical inquiry , 1989 .

[11]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  The origins of order , 1993 .

[12]  C. R. Evans,et al.  Group Cohesion and Performance , 1991 .

[13]  J. Valacich,et al.  Group Size and Anonymity Effects on Computer-Mediated Idea Generation , 1992 .

[14]  P. Reeves.  Mission impossible? , 1993, Health services management.

[15]  J. McGrath,et al.  Group Task Performance and Communication Technology , 1993 .

[16]  S. Mohammed,et al.  Team Mental Model: Construct or Metaphor? , 1994 .

[17]  S. Barton,et al.  Chaos, self-organization, and psychology. , 1994, The American psychologist.

[18]  Susan Mohammed,et al.  Team Mental Model: Construct or Metaphor? , 1994 .

[19]  B. Mullen,et al.  The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. , 1994 .

[20]  Robert Johansen,et al.  Globalwork : bridging distance, culture, and time , 1994 .

[21]  J. Sutherland.  The Quark and the Jaguar , 1994 .

[22]  G. Mann.  The Quark and the Jaguar: adventures in the simple and the complex , 1994 .

[23]  Charles R. Schwenk,et al.  Devil's Advocacy and Dialectical Inquiry Effects on Face-to-Face and Computer-Mediated Group Decision Making , 1995 .

[24]  John H. Holland,et al.  Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity , 1995 .

[25]  K. Jehn.  A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict , 1995 .

[26]  John R. Koza,et al.  Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity. , 1995, Artificial Life.

[27]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[28]  J. R. Aiello,et al.  Electronic performance monitoring and social context: impact on productivity and stress. , 1995, The Journal of applied psychology.

[29]  Gregory T. Stevens,et al.  Emergence, Self-Organization, and Social Interaction: Arousal-Dependent Structure in Social Systems* , 1996 .

[30]  Patrick Finnegan,et al.  Group problem solving and decision making: an investigation of the process and the supporting technology , 1996, J. Inf. Technol..

[31]  A. Hollingshead.  Information Suppression and Status Persistence in Group Decision Making The Effects of Communication Media , 1996 .

[32]  Jessica Lipnack,et al.  Virtual Teams: Reaching Across Space, Time, and Organizations with Technology , 1997 .

[33]  Suzanne P. Weisband,et al.  Developing Trust in Virtual Teams , 1997, HICSS.

[34]  Merrill Warkentin,et al.  Virtual Teams versus Face-to-Face Teams: An Exploratory Study of a Web-based Conference System* , 1997 .

[35]  T. C. Powell,et al.  Information technology as competitive advantage: the role of human , 1997 .

[36]  Kevin J. Dooley,et al.  A Complex Adaptive Systems Model of Organization Change , 1997 .

[37]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[38]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  A Theory of Task/Technology Fit , 1998 .

[39]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  A Theory of Task/Technology Fit and Group Support Systems Effectiveness , 1998, MIS Q..

[40]  Michael J. Prietula,et al.  Simulating organizations: computational models of institutions and groups , 1998 .

[41]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Is Anybody Out There? Antecedents of Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[42]  Anthony R. Hendrickson,et al.  Virtual teams: Technology and the workplace of the future , 1998 .

[43]  David W. Hughes,et al.  Is anybody out there? , 1998, Nature.

[44]  J. Goldstein.  Emergence as a Construct: History and Issues , 1999 .

[45]  Merrill Warkentin,et al.  Training to improve virtual team communication , 1999, Inf. Syst. J..

[46]  M. Mazumdar,et al.  Avoiding Complexity Catastrophe in Coevolutionary Pockets: Strategies for Rugged Landscapes , 1999 .

[47]  Bill McKelvey,et al.  Complexity Theory in Organization Science: Seizing the Promise or Becoming a Fad? , 1999 .

[48]  Michael J. Prietula,et al.  Exploring the Effects of Agent Trust and Benevolence in a Simulated Organizational Task , 1999, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[49]  Benson Rosen,et al.  Virtual team effectiveness: a proposed research agenda , 1999, Inf. Syst. J..

[50]  Amos J. Storkey,et al.  The basins of attraction of a new Hopfield learning rule , 1999, Neural Networks.

[51]  P. Cilliers,et al.  Complexity and post-modernism: understanding complex systems , 1999 .

[52]  G. Northcraft,et al.  You have printed the following article : Why Differences Make a Difference : A Field Study of Diversity , Conflict , and Performance in Workgroups , 2007 .

[53]  Gérard P. Cachon,et al.  Perspective: Complexity Theory and Organization Science , 1999, Organization Science.

[54]  Jennifer L. Berdahl,et al.  The Study of Groups: Past, Present, and Future , 2000 .

[55]  Rino Falcone,et al.  The Socio-cognitive Dynamics of Trust: Does Trust Create Trust? , 2000, Trust in Cyber-societies.

[56]  R. Peterson,et al.  Task Conflict snd Relationship Conflict in Top Management Teams:The Pivotal Role of Intragroup Trust. , 1998 .

[57]  J. Mathieu,et al.  The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[58]  S. Mohammed,et al.  The Measurement of Team Mental Models: We Have No Shared Schema , 2000 .

[59]  J. Goldstein.  Emergence: A Construct Amid a Thicket of Conceptual Snares , 2000 .

[60]  M. Batty,et al.  Power law distributions in real and virtual worlds , 2000 .

[61]  Holly Arrow,et al.  Small Groups as Complex Systems: Formation, Coordination, Development, and Adaptation , 2000 .

[62]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Understanding Fit and Appropriation Effects in Group Support Systems via Meta-Analysis , 2001, MIS Q..

[63]  Yao-Hua Tan,et al.  Trust in Cyber-societies: Integrating the Human and Artificial Perspectives , 2000, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[64]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Intra-organizational Complexity and Computation , 2001 .

[65]  David J. Pauleen,et al.  Relationship building and the use of ICT in boundary-crossing virtual teams: a facilitator's perspective , 2001, J. Inf. Technol..

[66]  Jim Suchan,et al.  The communication characteristics of virtual teams: a case study , 2001 .

[67]  Paul H. J. Hendriks,et al.  Many rivers to cross: from ICT to knowledge management systems , 2001, J. Inf. Technol..

[68]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  Media and Group Cohesion: Relative Influences on Social Presence, Task Participation, and Group Consensus , 2001, MIS Q..

[69]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes , 2001 .

[70]  Michael J. Prietula,et al.  Boundedly rational and emotional agents cooperation, trust and rumor , 2001 .

[71]  E.,et al.  GROUPS : INTERACTION AND PERFORMANCE , 2001 .

[72]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  Radical Innovation Without Collocation: A Case Study at Boeing-Rocketdyne , 2001, MIS Q..

[73]  David G. Green,et al.  Consensus and cohesion in simulated social networks , 2001, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[74]  Claudio U. Ciborra,et al.  Sharing knowledge across boundaries , 2001, J. Inf. Technol..

[75]  Anne P. Massey,et al.  Getting It Together: Temporal Coordination and Conflict Management in Global Virtual Teams , 2001 .

[76]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Metaphors of virtuality: shaping an emergent reality , 2001, Inf. Organ..

[77]  Yao-Hua Tan,et al.  The Role of Trust and Deception in Virtual Societies , 2002, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[78]  Donald Hislop,et al.  Mission impossible? Communicating and sharing knowledge via information technology , 2002, J. Inf. Technol..

[79]  David Cornforth,et al.  Network Structures and Agreement in Social Network Simulations , 2002, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[80]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  Knowledge integration in virtual teams: The potential role of KMS , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[81]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  Dynamic nature of trust in virtual teams , 2002, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[82]  D. Beal,et al.  Cohesion and performance in groups: a meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[83]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Six Degrees: The Science of a Connected Age , 2003 .

[84]  I. Zigurs.  Leadership in virtual teams: Oxymoron or opportunity? , 2003 .

[85]  Michael J. Burke,et al.  The impact of group process variables on the effectiveness of distance collaboration groups , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[86]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Out of Sight, Out of Sync: Understanding Conflict in Distributed Teams , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[87]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Advances in Measuring Team Cognition , 2003 .

[88]  Stefan Bornholdt,et al.  Dynamics of social networks , 2003, Complex..

[89]  P. Curșeu.  Formal group decision-making: A social-cognitive approach. , 2003 .

[90]  D. R. White,et al.  Structural cohesion and embeddedness: A hierarchical concept of social groups , 2003 .

[91]  G. Vozikis,et al.  Trust in Virtual Teams , 2004 .

[92]  Lucy Gilson,et al.  Virtual Teams: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go From Here? , 2004 .

[93]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  Toward Contextualized Theories of Trust: The Role of Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[94]  Ezra W. Zuckerman,et al.  How to Make the Team: Social Networks vs. Demography as Criteria for Designing Effective Teams , 2004 .

[95]  N.W. Coppola,et al.  Building trust in virtual teams , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[96]  Sarvapali D. Ramchurn,et al.  Trust in multi-agent systems , 2004, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[97]  J. Rentsch,et al.  Quantifying congruence in cognition: Social relations modeling and team member schema similarity. , 2004 .

[98]  E. Salas,et al.  Team cognition : understanding the factors that drive process and performance , 2004 .

[99]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  The Impact of Team Empowerment on Virtual Team Performance: The Moderating Role of Face-to-Face Interaction , 2004 .

[100]  Ned Kock,et al.  Trust and leadership in virtual teamwork: A media naturalness perspective , 2004 .

[101]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  A Practice Perspective on Technology-Mediated Network Relations: The Use of Internet-Based Self-Serve Technologies , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[102]  Likoebe M. Maruping,et al.  Managing team interpersonal processes through technology: a task-technology fit perspective. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[103]  Christopher J. Hemingway,et al.  Making organisations virtual: the hidden cost of distributed teams , 2004, J. Inf. Technol..

[104]  P. Curșeu.  The cognitive complexity of groups. A critical look at team cognition research , 2005 .

[105]  Dustin K. Jundt,et al.  Teams in organizations: from input-process-output models to IMOI models. , 2005, Annual review of psychology.

[106]  W. Powell,et al.  SOCIAL COHESION , 2005 .

[107]  Graham Pervan,et al.  A critical analysis of decision support systems research , 2005, J. Inf. Technol..

[108]  Guido Hertel,et al.  Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research , 2005 .

[109]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Understanding Conflict in Geographically Distributed Teams: The Moderating Effects of Shared Identity, Shared Context, and Spontaneous Communication , 2005 .

[110]  W. Baets,et al.  Emergence of peace and conflict : An experiment with agent-based simulations , 2005 .

[111]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Critical themes in electronic commerce research: a meta-analysis , 2005, J. Inf. Technol..

[112]  Anand Jeyaraj,et al.  A review of the predictors, linkages, and biases in IT innovation adoption research , 2006, J. Inf. Technol..

[113]  S. Clegg.  The SAGE Handbook of Organization Studies , 2006 .

[114]  Bill McKelvey,et al.  Complexity Science and Organization Studies , 2006 .

[115]  Volker Wulf,et al.  IT to support knowledge sharing in communities, towards a social capital analysis , 2006, J. Inf. Technol..

[116]  Stephen Corea,et al.  Information technology and the modalisation of organisational behaviour: a theoretical framework , 2006, J. Inf. Technol..

[117]  J. R. Fleming.  The Communication Characteristics of Virtual Teams , 2007 .

[118]  Petru Lucian Curşeu,et al.  How do virtual teams process information? A literature review and implications for management , 2008 .