TOWARDS A NEW ARCHITECTURE FOR AUTONOMOUS DATA COLLECTION

A new generation of UAVs is coming that will help improve the situational awareness and assessment necessary to ensure quality data collection, especially in difficult conditions like natural disasters. Operators should be relieved from time-consuming data collection tasks as much as possible and at the same time, UAVs should assist data collection operations through a more insightful and automated guidance thanks to advanced sensing capabilities. In order to achieve this vision, two challenges must be addressed though. The first one is to achieve a sufficient autonomy, both in terms of navigation and of interpretation of the data sensed. The second one relates to the reliability of the UAV with respect to accidental (safety) or even malicious (security) risks. This however requires the design and development of new embedded architectures for drones to be more autonomous, while mitigating the harm they may potentially cause. We claim that the increased complexity and flexibility of such platforms requires resorting to modelling, simulation, or formal verification techniques in order to validate such critical aspects of the platform. This paper first discusses the potential and challenges faced by autonomous UAVs for data acquisition. The design of a flexible and adaptable embedded UAV architecture is then addressed. Finally, the need for validating the properties of the platform is discussed. Our approach is sketched and illustrated with the example of a lightweight drone performing 3D reconstructions out of the combination of 2D image acquisition and a specific motion control.

[1]  Christian Boitet,et al.  The “Whiteboard” Architecture: A Way to Integrate Heterogeneous Components of NLP Systems , 1994, COLING.

[2]  Susan J. Altman,et al.  Make This World a Better Place , 2013, The Principal’s Graduation.

[3]  Jean-Luc Dugelay,et al.  UAVs for humanitarian missions: Autonomy and reliability , 2014, IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC 2014).

[4]  Francois Lefeuvre,et al.  THE CONTRIBUTION OF RADIO SCIENCES TO DISASTER MANAGEMENT , 2011 .

[5]  Barbara Hayes-Roth,et al.  A Blackboard Architecture for Control , 1985, Artif. Intell..

[6]  Elizabeth A. Buie The whiteboard , 2000, INTR.

[7]  Debarati Guha-Sapir,et al.  Annual Statistical Review: Numbers and Trends 2012 , 2011 .

[8]  Benjamin Ranft 3D perception for autonomous navigation of a low-cost MAV using minimal landmarks , 2013 .

[9]  Tullio Joseph Tanzi,et al.  Robot d’intervention multifonction d’assistance post-catastrophe , 2014 .

[10]  H. P Nii,et al.  Blackboard Systems , 1986 .

[11]  Rabéa Ameur-Boulifa,et al.  A UML-based Environment for System Design Space Exploration , 2006, 2006 13th IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits and Systems.

[12]  Debarati Guha-Sapir,et al.  Annual Disaster Statistical Review 2009The numbers and trends , 2010 .

[13]  Luciano Lavagno,et al.  Metropolis: An Integrated Electronic System Design Environment , 2003, Computer.

[14]  Kristinn R. Thórisson,et al.  Whiteboards: Scheduling Blackboards for Semantic Routing of Messages & Streams , 2005 .

[15]  D. Corkill Blackboard Systems , 1991 .