Innovative regression-based methodology to assess the techno-economic performance of photovoltaic installations in urban areas

Abstract Households present a significant contribution in the national energy consumption, and photovoltaics (PV) has become an economically feasible technology that can play an important role to lower this consumption and the associated emissions. Nevertheless, there is still a gap between too in-depth technical models for detailed studies and what urban energy planners need, which are simpler, yet reliable techno-economical tools to select which roofs of city buildings are the best candidates for PV production. In order to face this gap, a multiple linear regression (MLR) model has been developed to determine the economic payback using dimensionless parameters. The methodology has been adopted in the city of Valencia (Spain) for a large sample of multi-storey buildings, which are the most common typology. The approach has a high replicability since it can be applied for different countries. The MLR model provides a payback root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.48 years in comparison with a complex techno-economic model which was previously developed and validated with the software System Advisor Model (SAM). The variables which have a bigger weight in the payback are the shadow losses and the power unit cost due to the economy of scale. With the current Spanish regulation, PV installations on multi-storey buildings can reach paybacks of around 7–15 years and the best option is to have large economies of scales together with a low energy surplus.

[1]  Kin Ho Poon,et al.  Parametric study of URBAN morphology on building solar energy potential in Singapore context , 2020 .

[2]  Antonio Sanfilippo,et al.  Analysis of the long-term solar potential for electricity generation in Qatar , 2017 .

[3]  Joaquín Alonso-Montesinos,et al.  Hourly PV production estimation by means of an exportable multiple linear regression model , 2019, Renewable Energy.

[4]  Dirk C. Jordan,et al.  Photovoltaic Degradation Rates—an Analytical Review , 2012 .

[5]  Marcelo Cortés,et al.  Development and comparison of PV production estimation models for mc-Si technologies in Chile and Spain , 2021 .

[6]  M. Brito,et al.  Solar energy potential on roofs and facades in an urban landscape , 2013 .

[7]  Antonio Gómez Expósito,et al.  On the potential contribution of rooftop PV to a sustainable electricity mix: the case of Spain , 2020, ArXiv.

[8]  C. Ren,et al.  Sky view factor analysis of street canyons and its implications for daytime intra‐urban air temperature differentials in high‐rise, high‐density urban areas of Hong Kong: a GIS‐based simulation approach , 2012 .

[9]  J. Payá,et al.  Development and validation in a 2D-GIS environment of a 3D shadow cast vector-based model on arbitrarily orientated and tilted surfaces , 2020 .

[10]  L. Mabe,et al.  Assessment of urban-scale potential for solar PV generation and consumption , 2019, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science.

[11]  Miguel Brito,et al.  Modelling solar potential in the urban environment: State-of-the-art review , 2015 .

[12]  Alessandra Scognamiglio,et al.  A cross-country perspective on solar energy in urban planning: Lessons learned from international case studies , 2019, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[13]  Julieta Schallenberg-Rodriguez,et al.  Photovoltaic techno-economical potential on roofs in regions and islands: The case of the Canary Islands. Methodological review and methodology proposal , 2013 .

[14]  Rob Lawrence,et al.  Economic and technical assessment of rooftop solar photovoltaic potential in Brownsville, Texas, U.S.A , 2020, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[15]  David Flynn,et al.  Artificial intelligence and machine learning approaches to energy demand-side response: A systematic review , 2020, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[16]  Robert Margolis,et al.  Rooftop Solar Photovoltaic Technical Potential in the United States , 2016 .

[17]  A. Banerjee,et al.  Hypothesis testing, type I and type II errors , 2009, Industrial psychiatry journal.

[18]  M. Brito,et al.  The importance of facades for the solar PV potential of a Mediterranean city using LiDAR data , 2017 .

[19]  Daniel M. Kammen,et al.  Rooftop solar photovoltaic potential in cities: how scalable are assessment approaches? , 2017 .

[20]  M. Nikolopoulou,et al.  Sky view factor as predictor of solar availability on building façades , 2018, Solar Energy.

[21]  Miro Zeman,et al.  A simplified skyline-based method for estimating the annual solar energy potential in urban environments , 2019, Nature Energy.

[22]  G. Aydin.  Modeling of energy consumption based on economic and demographic factors: The case of Turkey with projections , 2014 .

[23]  Bastien Girod,et al.  Profitability in absence of subsidies: A techno-economic analysis of rooftop photovoltaic self-consumption in residential and commercial buildings , 2016 .

[24]  E. Trutnevyte,et al.  Spatial projections of solar PV installations at subnational level: Accuracy testing of regression models , 2020 .

[25]  R. Royo,et al.  Experimental results and simulation with TRNSYS of a 7.2 kWp grid-connected photovoltaic system , 2011 .

[26]  Kamaruzzaman Sopian,et al.  An overview of solar photovoltaic panels’ end-of-life material recycling , 2020 .

[27]  Filip Biljecki,et al.  Does a Finer Level of Detail of a 3D City Model Bring an Improvement for Estimating Shadows , 2017 .

[28]  Germán Martínez,et al.  Analysis of the photovoltaic solar energy capacity of residential rooftops in Andalusia (Spain) , 2010 .

[29]  Luis Muñoz,et al.  ENERGIA SOLAR FOTOVOLTAICA , 2012, Anais Congresso Brasileiro de Energia Solar - CBENS.

[30]  Campos Inês,et al.  Regulatory challenges and opportunities for collective renewable energy prosumers in the EU , 2020 .

[31]  Guihua Wang,et al.  Barriers and policy enablers for solar photovoltaics (PV) in cities: Perspectives of potential adopters in Hong Kong , 2018, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[32]  J. Michalsky.  The Astronomical Almanac's algorithm for approximate solar position (1950 - 2050). , 1988 .

[33]  Alireza Mohammad Shirazi,et al.  Techno-economic BIPV evaluation method in urban areas , 2019 .

[34]  János Unger,et al.  A new software tool for SVF calculations using building and tree-crown databases , 2014 .

[35]  H. Manz,et al.  Empirical validation of models to compute solar irradiance on inclined surfaces for building energy simulation , 2007 .

[36]  Moien Ali Omar,et al.  Grid connected PV- home systems in Palestine: A review on technical performance, effects and economic feasibility , 2018 .

[37]  C Gatsonis,et al.  Multiple correlation: exact power and sample size calculations. , 1989, Psychological bulletin.

[38]  Mohd Amran Mohd Radzi,et al.  Power loss due to soiling on solar panel: A review , 2016 .

[39]  Muhammad Uzair,et al.  The proper interpretation of analytical sky view factors for isotropic diffuse solar irradiance on tilted planes , 2017 .