Towards a comprehensive safety evaluation of cycling infrastructure including objective and subjective measures

Cycling infrastructure has been implemented worldwide to promote bicycle use and to minimize injury risk. A comprehensive evaluation of such infrastructure is required to assess its success. In terms of safety, assessments ideally focus on both objective and subjective parameters. This study explores the application of a combined objective-subjective safety assessment approach in a pre-post analysis of a left-turning bicycle box in Zurich, Switzerland. A computer-based video technology was used to objectively measure passing distance between bicycles turning left and continuing motor vehicles passing on the right. In an in-situ survey perceived safety while crossing the intersection and a photo-based assessment of the intersection were collected as indicators of subjective safety. Median passing distance between bicycles and motor vehicles did not significantly change after the implementation of the bicycle box, but the shortest distances were increased. Perceived safety while crossing the intersection was significantly higher after marking the bicycle box, which is consistent with safety expectations expressed based on photos with and without left-turning box. Gender and general perception of traffic safety within the city are significant determinants of expected and perceived intersection safety. Women expect greater safety gains from the left-turning box (photo based), but its effect on perceived safety when actually crossing the intersection does not differ between genders. While the applied video technology is not yet practice-ready, it shows great potential to complement cycling safety evaluations, in combination with self-reported perceived safety indicators.

[1]  M. Harris,et al.  Impact of Transportation Infrastructure on Bicycling Injuries and Crashes : a Review of the Literature , 2009 .

[2]  Asad J Khattak,et al.  The role of the built environment in explaining relationships between perceived and actual pedestrian and bicyclist safety. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  Narelle L. Haworth,et al.  Male and Female, Cyclist and Driver Perceptions of Crash Risk , 2015 .

[4]  B. Ghosh,et al.  Quantifying the Health Impacts of Active Travel: Assessment of Methodologies , 2015 .

[5]  James J. Murphy,et al.  A Meta-analysis of Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Valuation , 2003 .

[6]  Nicolas Saunier,et al.  Automated classification based on video data at intersections with heavy pedestrian and bicycle traffic: Methodology and application , 2015 .

[7]  Nicolas Saunier,et al.  Impact of Bicycle Boxes on Safety of Cyclists:A Case Study in Montreal , 2013 .

[8]  Jennifer Dill,et al.  Influence of Bike Lane Buffer Types on Perceived Comfort and Safety of Bicyclists and Potential Bicyclists , 2015 .

[9]  Rune Elvik,et al.  How accurately does the public perceive differences in transport risks? An exploratory analysis of scales representing perceived risk. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  Susan L Handy,et al.  Explaining Gender Difference in Bicycling Behavior , 2009 .

[11]  D. Levinson,et al.  TRAILS, LANES, OR TRAFFIC: VALUING BICYCLE FACILITIES WITH AN ADAPTIVE STATED PREFERENCE SURVEY , 2007 .

[12]  Peter A Cripton,et al.  Route infrastructure and the risk of injuries to bicyclists: a case-crossover study. , 2012, American journal of public health.

[13]  D N Castillo,et al.  Limitations of data compiled from police reports on pediatric pedestrian and bicycle motor vehicle events. , 1990, Accident Analysis and Prevention.

[14]  Paul St-Aubin,et al.  Road User Collision Prediction Using Motion Patterns Applied to Surrogate Safety Analysis , 2014 .

[15]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  A framework for automated road-users classification using movement trajectories , 2013 .

[16]  P L Jacobsen,et al.  Who owns the roads? How motorised traffic discourages walking and bicycling , 2009, Injury Prevention.

[17]  Peter G. Furth,et al.  Low-Stress Bicycling and Network Connectivity , 2012 .

[18]  L R Salmi,et al.  Road accident statistics: discrepancies between police and hospital data in a French island. , 1999, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[19]  M. Harris,et al.  Safe cycling: how do risk perceptions compare with observed risk? , 2012, Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique.

[20]  Rebecca L. Sanders,et al.  Perceived traffic risk for cyclists: the impact of near miss and collision experiences. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[21]  Anna Goodman,et al.  Evaluating the impacts of new walking and cycling infrastructure on carbon dioxide emissions from motorized travel: a controlled longitudinal study. , 2014, Applied energy.

[22]  Nicolas Saunier,et al.  Road User Collision Prediction Using Motion Patterns Applied to Surrogate Safety Analysis , 2014 .

[23]  A. Bauman,et al.  Current cycling, bicycle path use, and willingness to cycle more-findings from a community survey of cycling in southwest sydney, australia. , 2010, Journal of physical activity & health.

[24]  V. E. Daniel,et al.  Determinants of bicycle use: do municipal policies matter? , 2004 .

[25]  W. Y. Szeto,et al.  Perception of safety of cyclists in Dublin City. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[26]  Christine R. Harris,et al.  Gender Differences in Risk Assessment: Why do Women Take Fewer Risks than Men? , 2006, Judgment and Decision Making.

[27]  Luc Int Panis,et al.  Health impact assessment of active transportation: A systematic review. , 2015, Preventive medicine.

[28]  Dominique Lord,et al.  Modeling motor vehicle crashes using Poisson-gamma models: examining the effects of low sample mean values and small sample size on the estimation of the fixed dispersion parameter. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[29]  D. Ogilvie,et al.  Interventions to promote cycling: systematic review , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[30]  M. Petticrew,et al.  Promoting walking and cycling as an alternative to using cars: systematic review , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[31]  Jan Garrard,et al.  Cycling as a Part of Daily Life: A Review of Health Perspectives , 2016 .

[32]  Randy B Machemehl,et al.  Effects of Bicycle Boxes on Bicyclist and Motorist Behavior at Intersections in Austin, Texas , 2011 .

[33]  Nicolas Saunier,et al.  Are signalized intersections with cycle tracks safer? A case-control study based on automated surrogate safety analysis using video data. , 2016, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[34]  K. Krizek,et al.  Promoting walking and bicycling: assessing the evidence to assist planners , 2010 .

[35]  M. Raschke,et al.  Bicycle accidents - do we only see the tip of the iceberg? A prospective multi-centre study in a large German city combining medical and police data. , 2012, Injury.

[36]  K. Teschke,et al.  Motivators and deterrents of bicycling: comparing influences on decisions to ride , 2011 .

[37]  Jennifer Dill,et al.  Evaluation of bike boxes at signalized intersections. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[38]  Larry Head,et al.  Surrogate Safety Measures from Traffic Simulation Models , 2003 .

[39]  Fridulv Sagberg,et al.  Reduction in car-bicycle conflict at a road-cycle path intersection: Evidence of road user adaptation? , 2011 .