An Analysis of Technologically Radical Innovation and Breakthrough Patents

Abstract Breakthrough innovations – commonly defined by innovations with patents surpassing a critical threshold of forward citations – generate benefits for innovators, businesses, and society. Analyzing more than five million patents and citations from 1976 to 2017, this paper adds to the existing literature by examining whether the radicalness of a patented good – that is, the more technology classes cited as contributing prior arts not identified in the patent’s own technology identity – impacts the likelihood an innovation is a breakthrough. In essence, the paper tests the common belief that it is beneficial to “think outside the box” when innovating. The results show that increased radicalness increases the likelihood of a breakthrough up to a certain threshold, after which increased radicalness decreases the likelihood of a breakthrough. Additionally, established innovators and university ownership of a patent each extend the range for which increased radicalness increases the probability of a breakthrough, while joint patent ownership decreases the range.

[1]  Myriam Mariani,et al.  “Stacking” and “picking” inventions: The patenting behavior of European inventors , 2007 .

[2]  D. Harhoff,et al.  Citation Frequency and the Value of Patented Inventions , 1999, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[3]  Ming-Cheng Wu Antecedents of patent value using exchange option models: Evidence from a panel data analysis , 2011 .

[4]  QUALITY in scientific research. , 1949, Current Science.

[5]  Roland Ortt,et al.  Cooperating with technologically (dis)similar alliance partners: the influence of the technology life cycle and the impact on innovative and market performance , 2015, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[6]  Denisa Mindruta,et al.  Value Creation in University-Firm Research Collaborations: A Matching Approach , 2008 .

[7]  Scott Stern,et al.  Climbing Atop the Shoulders of Giants: The Impact of Institutions on Cumulative Research , 2006, American Economic Review.

[8]  Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al.  Academic patent quality and quantity before and after the Bayh-Dole act in the United States , 2002 .

[9]  Scott Stern,et al.  Climbing Atop the Shoulders of Giants: The Impact of Institutions on Cumulative Research , 2006 .

[10]  Patrick Cohendet,et al.  Technology transfer revisited from the perspective of the knowledge-based economy , 2001 .

[11]  K. Briggs,et al.  More is better: evidence that joint patenting leads to quality innovation , 2014 .

[12]  Jasjit Singh,et al.  Lone Inventors as Source of Breakthroughs: Myth or Reality? , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[13]  Karin Hoisl,et al.  Knowledge Recombination Across Technological Boundaries: Scientists vs. Engineers , 2013, Manag. Sci..

[14]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  Market value and patent citations , 2005 .

[15]  D. Hicks 360 degree linkage analysis , 2000 .

[16]  Shaker A. Zahra,et al.  Where Do Breakthroughs Come From? Characteristics of High‐Potential Inventions , 2013 .

[17]  L. Anselin,et al.  Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge , 2002 .

[18]  Curba Morris Lampert,et al.  Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions , 2001 .

[19]  Ulrich Schmoch,et al.  Are international co-publications an indicator for quality of scientific research? , 2008, Scientometrics.

[20]  Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al.  Changes in university patent quality after the Bayh-Dole act: a re-examination , 2003 .

[21]  Koen Frenken,et al.  Related Variety, Unrelated Variety and Technological Breakthroughs: An analysis of US State-Level Patenting , 2015 .

[22]  Raffaele Conti,et al.  Learning to Be Edison: Inventors, Organizations, and Breakthrough Inventions , 2014, Organ. Sci..

[23]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  Technology Familiarity, Recombinant Novelty and Breakthrough Invention , 2015 .

[24]  C. Ai,et al.  Computing Interaction Effects and Standard Errors in Logit and Probit Models , 2004 .

[25]  G. Duysters,et al.  The technological origins of radical inventions , 2010 .

[26]  W. Myers,et al.  Atypical Combinations and Scientific Impact , 2013 .

[27]  Keyvan Vakili,et al.  The double-edged sword of recombination in breakthrough innovation , 2013 .

[28]  Sarah Kaplan,et al.  The double-edged sword of recombination in breakthrough innovation: The Double-Edged Sword of Recombination , 2015 .

[29]  M. Weitzman,et al.  Recombinant Growth , 2009 .

[30]  Thorsten Kliewe,et al.  Leveraging Organizational Resources by Creative Coupling: An Evaluation of Methods for Intellectual Asset Identification , 2009 .

[31]  J. Hagedoorn,et al.  Measuring innovative performance: is there an advantage in using multiple indicators? , 2003 .

[32]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  Going radical: producing and transferring disruptive innovation , 2015 .

[33]  B. Looy,et al.  Co-Ownership of Intellectual Property: Exploring the Value-Appropriation and Value-Creation Implications of Co-Patenting with Different Partners , 2013 .

[34]  M. Trajtenberg A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , 1990 .

[35]  Kristina Dahlin,et al.  When is an Invention Really Radical? Defining and Measuring Technological Radicalness , 2005 .

[36]  J. Hagedoorn Sharing intellectual property rights - an exploratory study of joint patenting amongst companies. , 2003 .

[37]  Francesco Schettino,et al.  Inventive Productivity and Patent Quality: Evidence from Italian Inventors , 2013 .

[38]  Bryan Dowd,et al.  Interaction Terms in Nonlinear Models , 2002 .

[39]  Kristie Briggs,et al.  Co-owner relationships conducive to high quality joint patents , 2015 .

[40]  Jaeyong Song,et al.  Creating new technology through alliances: An empirical investigation of joint patents , 2007 .

[41]  J. Hagedoorn,et al.  Contract Law and the Governance of Inter-Firm Technology Partnerships - An Analysis of Different Modes of Partnering and Their Contractual Implications , 2007 .

[42]  Sam Arts,et al.  Path Dependency and Recombinant Exploration: How Established Firms Can Outperform in the Creation of Technological Breakthroughs , 2012 .

[43]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[44]  Evila Piva,et al.  Strengths and Weaknesses of Academic Startups: A Conceptual Model , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[45]  Krishna B. Kumar EDUCATION AND TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION IN A SMALL OPEN ECONOMY: THEORY AND EVIDENCE , 2003, Macroeconomic Dynamics.

[46]  William R. Kerr,et al.  Breakthrough Inventions and Migrating Clusters of Innovation , 2009 .

[47]  Scott Shane,et al.  Technological Opportunities and New Firm Creation , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[48]  Gianluca Carnabuci,et al.  Risky Recombinations: Institutional Gatekeeping in the Innovation Process , 2017, Organ. Sci..

[49]  Wen-Hsiang Lai,et al.  Willingness-to-engage in technology transfer in industry–university collaborations , 2011 .

[50]  James M. Utterback,et al.  The Process of Technological Innovation Within the Firm , 1971 .

[51]  Carolyn Deere Birkbeck World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) , 2001, World Trade and Arbitration Materials.

[52]  Roberto Fontana,et al.  Schumpeterian patterns of innovation and the sources of breakthrough inventions: evidence from a data-set of R&D awards , 2012 .

[53]  A. Nerkar,et al.  Beyond local search: boundary‐spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry , 2001 .

[54]  Valerio Sterzi,et al.  Patent quality and ownership: an analysis of UK Faculty patenting , 2013 .

[55]  João Tovar Jalles,et al.  How to measure innovation? New evidence of the technology–growth linkage ☆ , 2010 .

[56]  Nicola Baldini,et al.  University patenting: patterns of faculty motivations , 2009, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[57]  M. Srivastava,et al.  When do relational resources matter? Leveraging portfolio technological resources for breakthrough innovation , 2011, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[58]  C. Ai,et al.  Interaction terms in logit and probit models , 2003 .

[59]  Denisa Mindruta,et al.  Value creation in university-firm research collaborations: A matching approach , 2013 .

[60]  Tarun Kabiraj On the incentives for cooperative research , 2007 .

[61]  Katrin Hussinger,et al.  Commercializing academic research: the quality of faculty patenting , 2011 .

[62]  Jasjit Singh Distributed R&D, Cross-Regional Knowledge Integration and Quality of Innovative Output , 2006 .