Sustainability and Neoliberal Urban Development: The Environment, Crime and the Remaking of Austin’s Downtown

This paper explores the development of the smart growth programme in Austin, Texas. Drawing on growth machine theory, it documents the conflict in Austin in the 1980s and 1990s between pro-growth and anti-growth machine coalitions over urban sprawl. Around that time, the business community also began to focus on the redevelopment of city’s downtown and the need to address the problems of crime and homelessness. By the mid 1990s, the need to ‘clean up the streets’ was increasingly coupled with arguments about being ‘green’. It is argued that the development of the particular urban sustainability compromise that emerged in Austin, which has become a core part of the city’s competitiveness, was an institutional innovation made possible by struggles between the business community and local environmental activists. The institutional compromise, however, was achieved only by a spatial compromise that shifted the costs of growth from natural ecological onto the city’s homeless population.

[1]  R. Keil,et al.  Cities and the Politics of Sustainability , 2012 .

[2]  W. Swearingen.  Environmental City: People, Place, Politics, and the Meaning of Modern Austin , 2010 .

[3]  S. Dooling.  Ecological Gentrification: A Research Agenda Exploring Justice in the City , 2009 .

[4]  E. Tretter.  The Cultures of Capitalism: Glasgow and the Monopoly of Culture , 2009 .

[5]  R. Riddell,et al.  Urban Growth Management , 2008 .

[6]  G. Helms.  Towards Safe City Centres?: Remaking the Spaces of an Old-Industrial City , 2008 .

[7]  Eugene J. McCann.  Inequality and Politics in the Creative City-Region: Questions of Livability and State Strategy , 2007 .

[8]  David Gibbs,et al.  The sustainable development paradox : urban political economy in the United States and Europe , 2007 .

[9]  S. Herbert,et al.  Conceptions of Space and Crime in the Punitive Neoliberal City , 2006 .

[10]  M. Neuman.  The Compact City Fallacy , 2005 .

[11]  P. Troutman.  A Growth Machine’s Plan B: Legitimating Development When the Value-Free Growth Ideology Is under Fire , 2004 .

[12]  Andrew E. G. Jonas,et al.  The environment and the entrepreneurial city: searching for the urban ‘sustainability;fix’ in Manchester and Leeds , 2004 .

[13]  R. Coleman.  Images from a Neoliberal City: The State, Surveillance and Social Control , 2004 .

[14]  B. Belina,et al.  Zero Tolerance for the Industrial Past and Other Threats: Policing and Urban Entrepreneurialism in Britain and Germany , 2003 .

[15]  Eugene J. McCann.  Framing Space and Time in the City: Urban Policy and the Politics of Spatial and Temporal Scale , 2003 .

[16]  Kent Portney.  Taking Sustainable Cities Seriously: Economic Development, the Environment, and Quality of Life in American Cities , 2003 .

[17]  P. Kantor,et al.  Cities in the international marketplace : the political economy of urban development in North America and Western Europe , 2002 .

[18]  D. Harvey.  Spaces of Capital: Towards a Critical Geography , 2001 .

[19]  Tim Hall,et al.  The entrepreneurial city : geographies of politics, regime, and representation , 1998 .

[20]  D. Mitchell.  The Annihilation of Space by Law: The Roots and Implications of Anti‐Homeless Laws in the United States , 1997 .

[21]  H. Leitner.  Cities in pursuit of economic growth The local state as entrepreneur , 1990 .

[22]  A. Orum,et al.  Power, Money, and the People: The Making of Modern Austin. , 1990 .

[23]  George Kozmetsky,et al.  Creating the technopolis: High-technology development in Austin, Texas☆ , 1989 .

[24]  H. Molotch,et al.  Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place , 1987 .