Life-cycle energy and GHG emissions of forest biomass harvest and transport for biofuel production in Michigan

High dependence on imported oil has increased U.S. strategic vulnerability and prompted more research in the area of renewable energy production. Ethanol production from renewable woody biomass, which could be a substitute for gasoline, has seen increased interest. This study analysed energy use and greenhouse gas emission impacts on the forest biomass supply chain activities within the State of Michigan. A life-cycle assessment of harvesting and transportation stages was completed utilizing peer-reviewed literature. Results for forest-delivered ethanol were compared with those for petroleum gasoline using data specific to the U.S. The analysis from a woody biomass feedstock supply perspective uncovered that ethanol production is more environmentally friendly (about 62% less greenhouse gas emissions) compared with petroleum based fossil fuel production. Sensitivity analysis was conducted with key inputs associated with harvesting and transportation operations. The results showed that research focused on improving biomass recovery efficiency and truck fuel economy further reduced GHG emissions and energy consumption.

[1]  Sabrina Spatari,et al.  Uncertainties in Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Advanced Biomass Feedstock Logistics Supply Chains in Kansas , 2014 .

[2]  Ajit K. Srivastava,et al.  Environmental impacts of roundwood supply chain options in Michigan: life-cycle assessment of harvest and transport stages , 2014 .

[3]  Anthony Halog,et al.  Attributional life cycle assessment of woodchips for bioethanol production , 2011 .

[4]  M. Curran,et al.  A review of assessments conducted on bio-ethanol as a transportation fuel from a net energy, greenhouse gas, and environmental life cycle perspective , 2007 .

[5]  Clara Valente,et al.  Bioenergy from mountain forest: a life cycle assessment of the Norwegian woody biomass supply chain , 2011 .

[6]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[7]  Shane Ward,et al.  Energy Audit of Wood Harvesting Systems , 2003 .

[8]  David Pimentel,et al.  Ethanol Fuels: Energy Balance, Economics, and Environmental Impacts Are Negative , 2003 .

[9]  P. Frederiksen,et al.  Integrated well-to-wheel assessment of biofuels combining energy and emission LCA and welfare economic Cost Benefit Analysis , 2014 .

[10]  Fengli Zhang,et al.  Comparative analysis of life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of supply chains for biofuel and fossil fuel production , 2011 .

[11]  Lynne Milgram,et al.  The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) , 1999 .

[12]  O. Andersen Consequential Life Cycle Environmental Impact Assessment , 2013 .

[13]  D Athanassiadis,et al.  Energy consumption and exhaust emissions in mechanized timber harvesting operations in Sweden. , 2000, The Science of the total environment.

[14]  Heather L MacLean,et al.  Characterizing model uncertainties in the life cycle of lignocellulose-based ethanol fuels. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[15]  Dana M. Johnson,et al.  A GIS-based method for identifying the optimal location for a facility to convert forest biomass to biofuel , 2011 .

[16]  K. Shadan,et al.  Available online: , 2012 .

[17]  N. Shah,et al.  The greenhouse gas emissions performance of cellulosic ethanol supply chains in Europe , 2009, Biotechnology for biofuels.

[18]  H. MacLean,et al.  Forest bioenergy or forest carbon? Assessing trade-offs in greenhouse gas mitigation with wood-based fuels. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  Dana M. Johnson,et al.  Development of a simulation model of biomass supply chain for biofuel production , 2012 .

[20]  Edie Sonne,et al.  Greenhouse gas emissions from forestry operations: a life cycle assessment. , 2006, Journal of environmental quality.

[21]  Lars-Gunnar Lindfors,et al.  On the nordic guidelines for life cycle assessment , 1996 .

[22]  Gerald Rebitzer,et al.  The ecoinvent database system: a comprehensive web-based LCA database , 2005 .

[23]  Sara González-García,et al.  Environmental impacts of forest production and supply of pulpwood: Spanish and Swedish case studies , 2009 .

[24]  Tong Qiu,et al.  A study of the LCA based biofuel supply chain multi-objective optimization model with multi-conversion paths in China , 2014 .

[25]  Francesco Cherubini,et al.  Energy- and greenhouse gas-based LCA of biofuel and bioenergy systems: Key issues, ranges and recommendations , 2009 .

[26]  Jens F. Peters,et al.  Simulation and life cycle assessment of biofuel production via fast pyrolysis and hydroupgrading , 2015 .

[27]  Tomas Nordfjell,et al.  Energy use and emissions due to the manufacture of a forwarder , 2002 .