Interaction of fibroblasts on polycarbonate membrane surfaces with different micropore sizes and hydrophilicity.

Surface topography appears to be an important but often neglected factor in implant performance. In this study, fibroblasts were cultured on a range of porous polycarbonate (PC) membranes with well defined surface topography (track-etched micropores, 0.2-8.0 microm in diameter) and wettability gradients. The wettability gradient on the PC membrane surfaces was produced by treating the surfaces with corona from a knife-type electrode whose power increased gradually along the sample length. The PC membrane surfaces were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and the water contact angle measurement. Fibroblasts were cultured on the corona-treated PC membrane surfaces with different micropore sizes for 1 and 2 days. The cells attached on the membrane surfaces were examined by SEM and the cell density on the surfaces was estimated by counting the number of attached cells along the wettability gradient. It was observed that the cells were adhered and grew more on the hydrophilic positions of the membrane surfaces than the more hydrophobic ones, regardless of micropore size. It was also observed that cell adhesion and growth decreased gradually with increasing micropore size of the membrane surfaces. It seems that the cell adhesion and growth were progressively inhibited as the membrane surfaces had micropores with increasing size, probably due to surface discontinuities produced by tract-etched pores. On the membrane surfaces with smaller micropore sizes, the cells seemed to override these surface discontinuities.

[1]  J. Šulc,et al.  The influence of hydrogel functional groups on cell behavior. , 1990, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[2]  J. Kivilahti,et al.  Effect of surface processing on the attachment, orientation, and proliferation of human gingival fibroblasts on titanium. , 1992, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[3]  Gregory Stephanopoulos,et al.  Effects of substratum morphology on cell physiology , 1994, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[4]  D. Brunette,et al.  Effects of a grooved titanium-coated implant surface on epithelial cell behavior in vitro and in vivo. , 1989, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[5]  D. Absolom,et al.  Endothelialization of polymer surfaces. , 1988, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[6]  F. Grinnell Cellular adhesiveness and extracellular substrata. , 1978, International review of cytology.

[7]  D. Briggs,et al.  Surface modification of polyethylene by electrical discharge treatment and the mechanism of autoadhesion , 1978 .

[8]  D. K. Owens Mechanism of corona–induced self-adhesion of polyethylene film , 1975 .

[9]  J. F. Carley,et al.  Corona-discharge treatment of polymeric films, II: Chemical studies , 1980 .

[10]  A. Harris,et al.  Anomalous preferences of cultured macrophages for hydrophobic and roughened substrata. , 1981, Journal of cell science.

[11]  J. Feijen,et al.  Interaction of cultured human endothelial cells with polymeric surfaces of different wettabilities. , 1985, Biomaterials.

[12]  J. H. Lee,et al.  A wettability gradient as a tool to study protein adsorption and cell adhesion on polymer surfaces. , 1993, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[13]  D. Brunette,et al.  Effects of a grooved epoxy substratum on epithelial cell behavior in vitro and in vivo. , 1988, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[14]  R E Baier,et al.  Surface properties determine bioadhesive outcomes: methods and results. , 1984, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[15]  Y. Ikada,et al.  GRAFT COPOLYMERIZATION OF ACRYLAMIDE ONTO A POLYETHYLENE SURFACE PRETREATED WITH GLOW DISCHARGE , 1986 .

[16]  B. Tighe,et al.  Cellular interactions with synthetic polymer surfaces in culture. , 1985, Biomaterials.

[17]  H. Busscher,et al.  Interaction of fibroblasts and polymer surfaces: relationship between surface free energy and fibroblast spreading. , 1983, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[18]  J. H. Lee,et al.  Platelet adhesion onto wettability gradient surfaces in the absence and presence of plasma proteins. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[19]  Yoshito Ikada,et al.  Oxidation of polyethylene surface by corona discharge and the subsequent graft polymerization , 1988 .

[20]  Mu Shik Jhon,et al.  Characterization of wettability gradient surfaces prepared by corona discharge treatment , 1992 .

[21]  H. Busscher,et al.  The influence of substratum surface free energy on growth and spreading of human fibroblasts in the presence and absence of serum proteins. , 1986, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[22]  A. Baszkin,et al.  Physico-chemical modifications of superficial regions of low-density polyethylene (LDPE) film under corona discharge , 1984 .

[23]  B. Ratner,et al.  Hydrophilic-hydrophobic copolymers as cell substrates: Effect on 3T3 cell growth rates , 1985 .