The Heart Trumps the Head: Desirability Bias in Political Belief Revision

Understanding how individuals revise their political beliefs has important implications for society. In a preregistered study (N = 900), we experimentally separated the predictions of 2 leading theories of human belief revision—desirability bias and confirmation bias—in the context of the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Participants indicated who they desired to win, and who they believed would win, the election. Following confrontation with evidence that was either consistent or inconsistent with their desires or beliefs, they again indicated who they believed would win. We observed a robust desirability bias—individuals updated their beliefs more if the evidence was consistent (vs. inconsistent) with their desired outcome. This bias was independent of whether the evidence was consistent or inconsistent with their prior beliefs. In contrast, we found limited evidence of an independent confirmation bias in belief updating. These results have implications for the relevant psychological theories and for political belief revision in practice.

[1]  D. Kahan.  The Politically Motivated Reasoning Paradigm, Part 1: What Politically Motivated Reasoning Is and How to Measure It , 2016 .

[2]  R. Nickerson.  Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises , 1998 .

[3]  T. Sharot,et al.  Optimistic update bias holds firm: Three tests of robustness following Shah et al. , 2017, Consciousness and Cognition.

[4]  Chingching Chang.  Motivated Processing , 2015 .

[5]  Adam J. L. Harris,et al.  A pessimistic view of optimistic belief updating , 2016, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  T. Sharot,et al.  Forming Beliefs: Why Valence Matters , 2016, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[7]  Justin M. Rao,et al.  The Good News-Bad News Effect: Asymmetric Processing of Objective Information about Yourself , 2011 .

[8]  Timothy D. Ritchie,et al.  The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding Short Form (BIDR-16) , 2015 .

[9]  M. Mobius,et al.  Managing Self-Confidence: Theory and Experimental Evidence , 2011, Manag. Sci..

[10]  Karen M. Douglas,et al.  Climate change: Why the conspiracy theories are dangerous , 2015 .

[11]  Charles S. Taber,et al.  The Motivated Processing of Political Arguments , 2009 .

[12]  Peter H. Ditto,et al.  Motivated Skepticism: Use of Differential Decision Criteria for Preferred and Nonpreferred Conclusions , 1992 .

[13]  M. Strube,et al.  Self-Evaluation: To Thine Own Self Be Good, To Thine Own Self Be Sure, To Thine Own Self Be True, an , 1997 .

[14]  Derek Powell,et al.  Countering antivaccination attitudes , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  D. Kahan.  The Politically Motivated Reasoning Paradigm, Part 2: Unanswered Questions , 2016 .

[16]  Gregory N. Mandel,et al.  The Polarizing Impact of Science Literacy and Numeracy on Perceived Climate Change Risks , 2012 .

[17]  Richard C. Clarke,et al.  Human development of the ability to learn from bad news , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Karen M. Douglas,et al.  The social consequences of conspiracism: Exposure to conspiracy theories decreases intentions to engage in politics and to reduce one's carbon footprint. , 2014, British journal of psychology.

[19]  Sebastian Bobadilla-Suarez,et al.  How People Update Beliefs about Climate Change: Good News and Bad News , 2016 .

[20]  Karen M. Douglas,et al.  The Effects of Anti-Vaccine Conspiracy Theories on Vaccination Intentions , 2014, PloS one.

[21]  J. Jost,et al.  Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[22]  J. Bowers,et al.  Social Influence in Televised Election Debates: A Potential Distortion of Democracy , 2011, PloS one.

[23]  Charles S. Taber,et al.  Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs , 2006 .

[24]  Peter H. Ditto,et al.  Tracing the threads: How five moral concerns (especially Purity) help explain culture war attitudes , 2012 .

[25]  E. Miller,et al.  Impact of anti-vaccine movements on pertussis control: the untold story , 1998, The Lancet.

[26]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  NASA Faked the Moon Landing—Therefore, (Climate) Science Is a Hoax , 2013, Psychological science.

[27]  Christoph W Korn,et al.  How unrealistic optimism is maintained in the face of reality , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  Motivated Rejection of Science , 2016 .

[29]  N. Weinstein.  Unrealistic optimism about future life events , 1980 .

[30]  Troy D. Abel,et al.  A Value-Belief-Norm Theory of Support for Social Movements: The Case of Environmentalism , 1999 .

[31]  L. Ross,et al.  Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence , 1979 .

[32]  C. Korn,et al.  Social feedback processing in borderline personality disorder , 2015, Psychological Medicine.

[33]  Soyoung Q. Park,et al.  Positively Biased Processing of Self-Relevant Social Feedback , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.