Quantitative assessment of photic phenomena in the presbyopia-correcting intraocular lens

This was a prospective study to evaluate the feasibility of the photic phenomena test (PPT) for quantifying glare, halo, and starburst. We compared two presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses (IOLs), the Symfony IOL and the PanOptix IOL, as well as the monofocal Clareon IOL in 111 IOL-implanted eyes of 111 patients who underwent the PPT 1 month postoperatively. The reproducibility of photic phenomena with the PPT was assessed in 39 multifocal IOL-implanted eyes of 20 patients and among the examiners. Patients with ocular diseases, except for refractive errors, were excluded. The mean values of the groups were evaluated. Bland–Altman plots were used to analyze statistical data (Easy R version 1.37; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). The PPT reproducibility assessment revealed no fixed bias or regressive significance. Reproducibility was confirmed. The glare size did not differ significantly between the Symfony, PanOptix, and Clareon groups. The halo size was significantly larger in the Symfony group (p < 0.01) than in the PanOptix group. The halo intensity was significantly brighter in the PanOptix group (p < 0.01) than in the Symfony group. In contrast, no halos were perceived in the Clareon group. The starburst size or intensity did not differ significantly between the Symfony, PanOptix, and Clareon groups. We identified the photic phenomenon related to various IOLs.

[1]  Elizabeth Yeu,et al.  Matching the Patient to the Intraocular Lens: Preoperative Considerations to Optimize Surgical Outcomes. , 2020, Ophthalmology.

[2]  F. Ribeiro,et al.  Comparison of visual and refractive outcomes of 2 trifocal intraocular lenses. , 2020, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[3]  P. Versace,et al.  Visual performance and positional stability of a capsulorhexis-fixated extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens. , 2020, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[4]  Z. Qin,et al.  Visual Outcome and Optical Quality after Implantation of Zonal Refractive Multifocal and Extended Range of Vision Intraocular Lenses: A Prospective Comparison. , 2020, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[5]  H. Bissen-Miyajima,et al.  Results of a clinical evaluation of a trifocal intraocular lens in Japan , 2020, Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology.

[6]  R. Khoramnia,et al.  Functional Outcomes and Reading Performance After Combined Implantation of a Small-Aperture Lens and a Segmental Refractive Bifocal Lens. , 2019, Journal of refractive surgery.

[7]  Jian Ye,et al.  Visual quality and performance following bilateral implantation of TECNIS Symfony intraocular lenses with or without micro-monovision , 2019, Clinical ophthalmology.

[8]  B. Cochener Influence of the level of monovision on visual outcome with an extended range of vision intraocular lens , 2018, Clinical ophthalmology.

[9]  Y. Zhao,et al.  [Long-term clinical observation of aspheric multifocal intraocular lens implantation]. , 2017, [Zhonghua yan ke za zhi] Chinese journal of ophthalmology.

[10]  Daniel H. Chang Visual acuity and patient satisfaction at varied distances and lighting conditions after implantation of an aspheric diffractive multifocal one-piece intraocular lens , 2016, Clinical ophthalmology.

[11]  J. Alió,et al.  Efficacy and safety of multifocal intraocular lenses following cataract and refractive lens exchange: Metaanalysis of peer‐reviewed publications , 2016, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[12]  J. Wolffsohn,et al.  Tablet App halometer for the assessment of dysphotopsia , 2015, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[13]  M. Castelo‐Branco,et al.  Quantitative Evaluation of Visual Function 12 Months after Bilateral Implantation of a Diffractive Trifocal IOL , 2015, European journal of ophthalmology.

[14]  B. Cochener,et al.  Clinical outcomes with a trifocal intraocular lens: a multicenter study. , 2014, Journal of refractive surgery.

[15]  K. Shimizu,et al.  Multifocal intraocular lens explantation: a case series of 50 eyes. , 2014, American journal of ophthalmology.

[16]  W. Lubiński,et al.  Clinical outcomes after cataract surgery with implantation of the Tecnis ZMB00 multifocal intraocular lens , 2014, Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research.

[17]  Yun-e Zhao,et al.  [Measurement of visual acuity at different distances after implantation of ReSTOR multifocal intraocular lenses]. , 2008, [Zhonghua yan ke za zhi] Chinese journal of ophthalmology.

[18]  M. Leyland,et al.  Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction. , 2003, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.