Information search behaviour of European forest policy decision-makers

Abstract This study aims at assessing the current search for and use of scientific information by decision-makers in European forest policy and to identify their information needs. A theoretical framework describes the influence of various factors (e.g., values, interests and assumptions) on information search and use. A model, based on the notion that, besides scientific information, also other types of information are important, was developed and used as the basis for a survey. This survey was carried out among people involved in European forest policy-processes (i.e., attendants to the MCPFE 2003, Vienna). The outcomes indicate: information on ongoing policy processes and legal instruments as the most important information types; internal sources (colleagues) as the most important sources of information; Internet as the source with the highest use-frequency and fees for online access of journals and databases as one of the main access constraints. The paper is concluded with a number of recommendations for improving the information supply and access situation based on the experiences of the people interviewed.

[1]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[2]  T. D. Wilson,et al.  Information behaviour: an interdisciplinary perspective , 1997, Inf. Process. Manag..

[3]  B. Emans Interviewen, theorie, techniek, training , 2003 .

[4]  Adri Smaling,et al.  Kwalitatief onderzoek: Praktijk en theorie , 1998 .

[5]  T. Christophersen,et al.  The influence of non-governmental organisations on the creation of Natura 2000 during the European Policy process , 2002 .

[6]  Paul V. Ellefson,et al.  Integrating science and policy development: case of the national research council and US national policy focused on non-federal forests , 2000 .

[7]  Linda A. Joyce,et al.  Improving the flow of scientific information across the interface of forest science and policy , 2003 .

[8]  Michael Pregernig,et al.  Putting science into practice: the diffusion of scientific knowledge exemplified by the Austrian `Research Initiative Against Forest Decline' , 2000 .

[9]  T. Hellström Technoscientific expertise and the significance of policy cultures , 2000 .

[10]  D. Norse,et al.  Links between science and policy making , 2000 .

[11]  G. Hoberg,et al.  Setting the Environmental Agenda in Canada and the United States: The Cases of Dioxin and Radon , 1991, Canadian Journal of Political Science.

[12]  Hanna J. Cortner,et al.  Making science relevant to environmental policy , 2000 .

[13]  K. Hogl The Austrian domestic forest policy community in change? Impacts of the globalisation and Europeanisation of forest politics , 2000 .

[14]  Raya Fidel,et al.  The many faces of accessibility: engineers' perception of information sources , 2004, Inf. Process. Manag..

[15]  Morten Hertzum,et al.  The information-seeking practices of engineers: searching for documents as well as for people , 2000, Inf. Process. Manag..

[16]  Peter Cullen,et al.  The turbulent boundary between water science and water management , 1990 .

[17]  Richard W. Guldin,et al.  Forest science and forest policy in the Americas: building bridges to a sustainable future , 2003 .

[18]  R. Lipshitz,et al.  Coping with Uncertainty: A Naturalistic Decision-Making Analysis , 1997 .

[19]  G. Bisbal The best available science for the management of anadromous salmonids in the Columbia River Basin , 2002 .

[20]  William P. Alston,et al.  Knowledge and the Flow of Information , 1985 .

[21]  Tiange Shi,et al.  Ecological economics as a policy science: rhetoric or commitment towards an improved decision-making process on sustainability , 2004 .

[22]  Judith E. Innes,et al.  Information in Communicative Planning , 1998 .

[23]  R. Clark,et al.  Roles of research scientists in natural resource decision-making , 2001 .