Collaborative Reflection: A Practice for Enriching Research Partnerships Spanning Culture, Discipline, and Time

All too often, research partnerships are project-driven and short-lived. Multi-lifespan design and other longer-term approaches offer alternative models. In this paper, we contribute one alternative model for cross-boundary research partnerships spanning longer timeframes and offer one best practice: collaborative reflection. Specifically, we provide an in-depth case study of a multi-lifespan design partnership (over nine years and ongoing) between a Rwandan NGO focused on peacebuilding and a US university research group focused on information design theory and method. First, we document our process for conducting a collaborative reflection that seeks balance among the contributors while navigating differences in culture, discipline, experience, and skills. Next, we reflect on five themes: (1) common ground: sensibilities and commitments; (2) trust; (3) research landscape: crossing nations and institutions; (4) research as a healing mechanism; and (5) multi-lifespan design partnership. We conclude with a discussion of overarching considerations for design researchers who engage in cross-boundary research partnership.

[1]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Envisioning across generations: a multi-lifespan information system for international justice in rwanda , 2013, CHI.

[2]  Silvia Lindtner,et al.  How Methods Make Designers , 2017, CHI.

[3]  Andrew Dillon,et al.  Design rationale: Concepts, techniques, and use , 1997 .

[4]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Multi-lifespan Design Thinking: Two Methods and a Case Study with the Rwandan Diaspora , 2016, CHI.

[5]  Isabelle Reymen,et al.  The role of emotion in design reflection , 2003 .

[6]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Multi-lifespan information system design: a research initiative for the hci community , 2010, CHI.

[7]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Pause: A Multi-lifespan Design Mechanism , 2017, CHI.

[8]  Isabelle Reymen,et al.  Improving design processes through structured reflection : a domain-independent approach , 2001 .

[9]  Indrani Medhi-Thies,et al.  Co-Design Across Borders Special Interest Group , 2017, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[10]  Raymond McCall,et al.  Making argumentation serve design , 1991 .

[11]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Postcolonial computing: a lens on design and development , 2010, CHI.

[12]  Gregory,et al.  Promises , Premises and Risks : Sharing Responsibilities , Working Up Trust and Sustaining Commitment in Participatory Design Projects , 2011 .

[13]  A. Baier Trust and Antitrust , 1986, Ethics.

[14]  R. Procter,et al.  Promises, premises and risks : sharing responsibilities, working up trust and sustaining commitment in participatory design projects , 2002 .

[15]  Raymond McCall,et al.  Making Argumentation Serve Design , 1996, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[16]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Multi-lifespan information system design: investigating a new design approach in Rwanda , 2011, iConference.

[17]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Design rationale: concepts, techniques, and use , 1996 .

[18]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Collaborative Research Across Disciplinary and Organizational Boundaries , 2005 .

[19]  Nicola J. Bidwell,et al.  Moving the centre to design social media in rural Africa , 2016, AI & SOCIETY.

[20]  Ariel Eytan,et al.  Mental and physical health in Rwanda 14 years after the genocide , 2012, Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology.

[21]  Volker Wulf,et al.  'On the ground' in Sidi Bouzid: investigating social media use during the tunisian revolution , 2013, CSCW.