Foot pronation is not associated with increased injury risk in novice runners wearing a neutral shoe: a 1-year prospective cohort study

Objective To investigate if running distance to first running-related injury varies between foot postures in novice runners wearing neutral shoes. Design A 1-year epidemiological observational prospective cohort study. Setting Denmark. Participants A total of 927 novice runners equivalent to 1854 feet were included. At baseline, foot posture on each foot was evaluated using the foot-posture index and categorised into highly supinated (n=53), supinated (n=369), neutral (n=1292), pronated (n=122) or highly pronated (n=18). Participants then had to start running in a neutral running shoe and to use global positioning system watch to quantify the running distance in every training session. Main outcome measure A running-related injury was defined as any musculoskeletal complaint of the lower extremity or back caused by running, which restricted the amount of running for at least 1 week. Results During 1 year of follow-up, the 1854 feet included in the analyses ran a total of 326 803 km until injury or censoring. A total of 252 participants sustained a running-related injury. Of these, 63 were bilateral injuries. Compared with a neutral foot posture, no significant body mass index-adjusted cumulative risk differences (RD) were found after 250 km of running for highly supinated feet (RD=11.0% (−10% to 32.1%), p=0.30), supinated feet (RD=−1.4% (−8.4% to 5.5%), p=0.69), pronated feet (RD=−8.1% (−17.6% to 1.3%), p=0.09) and highly pronated feet (RD=9.8% (−19.3% to 38.8%), p=0.51). In addition, the incidence-rate difference/1000 km of running, revealed that pronators had a significantly lower number of injuries/1000 km of running of −0.37 (−0.03 to −0.70), p=0.03 than neutrals. Conclusions The results of the present study contradict the widespread belief that moderate foot pronation is associated with an increased risk of injury among novice runners taking up running in a neutral running shoe. More work is needed to ascertain if highly pronated feet face a higher risk of injury than neutral feet.

[1]  Joshua D. Harris,et al.  Performance and Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Male Major League Soccer Players , 2013, Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine.

[2]  Sten Rasmussen,et al.  Footstrike patterns among novice runners wearing a conventional, neutral running shoe. , 2013, Gait & posture.

[3]  Sten Rasmussen,et al.  Can GPS Be Used to Detect Deleterious Progression in Training Volume Among Runners? , 2013, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[4]  Rasmus Oestergaard Nielsen,et al.  Predictors of Running-Related Injuries Among 930 Novice Runners , 2013, Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine.

[5]  M. Lind,et al.  Training errors and running related injuries: a systematic review. , 2012, International journal of sports physical therapy.

[6]  H. Sørensen,et al.  Protocol for the dano-run study: a 1-year observational follow up study on running related injuries in 1000 novice runners , 2011, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[7]  I. Buist,et al.  Higher risk of injury in overweight novice runners , 2011, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[8]  Y. Nagano,et al.  Prevention of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in female basketball players in japan: an intervention study over four seasons , 2011, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[9]  Jack E Taunton,et al.  The effect of three different levels of footwear stability on pain outcomes in women runners: a randomised control trial , 2010, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[10]  Bruce H Jones,et al.  Injury Reduction Effectiveness of Assigning Running Shoes Based on Plantar Shape in Marine Corps Basic Training , 2010, The American journal of sports medicine.

[11]  V. Chuter Relationships between foot type and dynamic rearfoot frontal plane motion , 2010, Journal of foot and ankle research.

[12]  W. van Mechelen,et al.  Predictors of Running-Related Injuries in Novice Runners Enrolled in a Systematic Training Program , 2010, The American journal of sports medicine.

[13]  Edward R Laskowski,et al.  Running Shoe Selection Criteria Among Adolescent Cross‐Country Runners , 2009, PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation.

[14]  Bruce H Jones,et al.  Injury Reduction Effectiveness of Selecting Running Shoes Based on Plantar Shape , 2009, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[15]  Hylton B Menz,et al.  Normative values for the Foot Posture Index , 2008, Journal of foot and ankle research.

[16]  W. van Mechelen,et al.  Incidence and risk factors of running-related injuries during preparation for a 4-mile recreational running event , 2008, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[17]  R. Callister,et al.  Is your prescription of distance running shoes evidence-based? , 2008, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[18]  S. Pocock,et al.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. , 2008, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[19]  Gert-Jan Pepping,et al.  No Effect of a Graded Training Program on the Number of Running-Related Injuries in Novice Runners , 2008, The American journal of sports medicine.

[20]  S. Pocock,et al.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. , 2007, Preventive medicine.

[21]  John P Klein,et al.  Analyzing survival curves at a fixed point in time , 2007, Statistics in medicine.

[22]  B. Koes,et al.  Incidence and determinants of lower extremity running injuries in long distance runners: a systematic review , 2007, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[23]  A. Hreljac Etiology, prevention, and early intervention of overuse injuries in runners: a biomechanical perspective. , 2005, Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America.

[24]  B M Nigg,et al.  Relationship between footwear comfort of shoe inserts and anthropometric and sensory factors. , 2001, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[25]  H. Menz,et al.  Alternative techniques for the clinical assessment of foot pronation. , 1998, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.

[26]  Bruce H Jones,et al.  Effect on injuries of assigning shoes based on foot shape in air force basic training. , 2010, American journal of preventive medicine.

[27]  Bill Vicenzino,et al.  Reliability of the modified Foot Posture Index. , 2008, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.

[28]  Mike Horton,et al.  The Foot Posture Index: Rasch analysis of a novel, foot-specific outcome measure. , 2007, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

[29]  Jack Crosbie,et al.  Development and validation of a novel rating system for scoring standing foot posture: the Foot Posture Index. , 2006, Clinical biomechanics.

[30]  M. Schwellnus,et al.  Does running shoe prescription alter the risk of developing a running injury? : original research article , 2006 .