Case studies, single-subject research, and N of 1 randomized trials: comparisons and contrasts.

Case studies, single-subject research designs, and N of 1 randomized clinical trials are methods of scientific inquiry applied to an individual or small group of individuals. A case study is a form of descriptive research that seeks to identify explanatory patterns for phenomena and generates hypotheses for future research. Single-subject research designs provide a quasi-experimental approach to investigating causal relationships between independent and dependent variables. They are characterized by repeated measures of an observable and clinically relevant target behavior throughout at least one pretreatment (baseline) and intervention phase. The N of 1 clinical trial is similar to the single-subject research design through its use of repeated measures over time but also borrows principles from the conduct of large, randomized controlled trials. Typically, the N of 1 trial compares a therapeutic procedure with placebo or compares two treatments by administering the two conditions in a predetermined random order. Neither the subject nor the clinician is aware of the treatment condition in any given period of time. All three approaches are relatively easy to integrate into clinical practice and are useful for documenting individualized outcomes and providing evidence in support of rehabilitation interventions.

[1]  H K Yuen,et al.  Improved productivity through purposeful use of additional template for a woman with cortical blindness. , 1993, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[2]  K. Ottenbacher Evaluating Clinical Change: Strategies for Occupational and Physical Therapists , 1986 .

[3]  Weiner Is,et al.  Clinical research: the case study and single-subject designs. , 1985 .

[4]  David Greene,et al.  A research design for generalizing from multiple case studies , 1984 .

[5]  K. Bjornson,et al.  The Effect of Body Position on the Oxygen Saturation of Ventilated Preterm Infants , 1992 .

[6]  K J Ottenbacher,et al.  Clinically Relevant Designs for Rehabilitation Research: The Idiographic Model , 1990, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[7]  J Deitz,et al.  Spasticity in Spinal Cord Injured Persons: Quantitative Effects of Baclofen and Placebo Treatments , 1990, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[8]  C. Backman,et al.  Mealtimes of the Institutionalized Elderly: A Quality of Life Issue , 1991 .

[9]  C. Backman,et al.  Static wrist splint: Its effect on hand function in three women with rheumatoid arthritis , 1988 .

[10]  T. L. Kinney LaPier,et al.  Aerobic exercise for a patient with chronic multisystem impairments. , 1998, Physical therapy.

[11]  D. Kellegrew Creating opportunities for occupation: an intervention to promote the self-care independence of young children with special needs. , 1998, American Journal of Occupational Therapy.

[12]  R. D'Agostino,et al.  Combining single patient (N-of-1) trials to estimate population treatment effects and to evaluate individual patient responses to treatment. , 1997, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[13]  C. Gonnella Single-subject experimental paradigm as a clinical decision tool. , 1989, Physical therapy.

[14]  S. Harris,et al.  Single-subject research in rehabilitation: a review of studies using AB, withdrawal, multiple baseline, and alternating treatments designs. , 1997, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[15]  S R Harris,et al.  Effects of inhibitive ankle-foot orthoses on standing balance in a child with cerebral palsy. A single-subject design. , 1986, Physical therapy.

[16]  K J Ottenbacher,et al.  Interrater reliability of therapists' judgements of graphed data. , 1991, Physical therapy.

[17]  M. Hersen Single case experimental designs , 1992 .

[18]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Determining optimal therapy--randomized trials in individual patients. , 1986, The New England journal of medicine.