A Joint Duty-Cycle and Transmission Power Management for Energy Harvesting WSN

In this paper, we propose a global power management approach for energy harvesting sensor nodes. Our approach is based on a joint duty-cycle optimization and transmission power control. By simultaneously adapting both parameters, the node can maximize the number of transmitted packets while respecting the limited and time-varying amount of available energy. We obtain a high-packet delivery by using an original predictive transmission power control that can efficiently adapt the transmission power to the wireless channel conditions. To accurately model the wireless channel and the node communication hardware, a waveform-level radio frequency simulator has been developed. Simulation results show 6.5 times improvement in energy efficiency and a packet reception ratio which is 9 times more efficient than a recently published technique. A 15% increase in energy efficiency, with respect to a fixed transmission power configuration, has also been observed. Finally, the global power management strategy has been validated on a real wireless sensor networks platform. Experimental results are very similar to those obtained in simulations, and thus confirm the efficiency of our power management approach.

[1]  W. Kluge,et al.  A Fully Integrated 2.4-GHz IEEE 802.15.4-Compliant Transceiver for ZigBee™ Applications , 2006, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits.

[2]  Jan M. Rabaey,et al.  Power-efficient rendez-vous schemes for dense wireless sensor networks , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Communications (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37577).

[3]  Cécile Belleudy,et al.  A framework for modeling and simulating energy harvesting WSN nodes with efficient power management policies , 2012, EURASIP J. Embed. Syst..

[4]  Sang Hyuk Son,et al.  ATPC: Adaptive Transmission Power Control for Wireless Sensor Networks , 2016, TOSN.

[5]  P. Levis,et al.  RSSI is Under Appreciated , 2006 .

[6]  Andreas F. Molisch,et al.  The COST 259 Directional Channel Model-Part II: Macrocells , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[7]  Kuang-Ching Wang,et al.  Study of Speed-Dependent Packet Error Rate for Wireless Sensor on Rotating Mechanical Structures , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[8]  Siyuan Chen,et al.  Energy-Efficient Topology Control in Cooperative Ad Hoc Networks , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems.

[9]  Olivier Berder,et al.  PowWow : Power Optimized Hardware/Software Framework for Wireless Motes , 2010, ARCS Workshops.

[10]  Mani B. Srivastava,et al.  Power management in energy harvesting sensor networks , 2007, TECS.

[11]  Guojun Dai,et al.  Remaining Energy-Level-Based Transmission Power Control for Energy-Harvesting WSNs , 2012, Int. J. Distributed Sens. Networks.

[12]  Luca Benini,et al.  Adaptive Power Management for Environmentally Powered Systems , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[13]  Ramesh Govindan,et al.  Understanding packet delivery performance in dense wireless sensor networks , 2003, SenSys '03.

[14]  Gerhard P. Hancke,et al.  A Distributed Topology Control Technique for Low Interference and Energy Efficiency in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[15]  Philip Levis,et al.  The β-factor: measuring wireless link burstiness , 2008, SenSys '08.

[16]  Kuang-Ching Wang,et al.  Channel Characterization and Link Quality Assessment of IEEE 802.15.4-Compliant Radio for Factory Environments , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[17]  Philip Levis,et al.  Understanding the causes of packet delivery success and failure in dense wireless sensor networks , 2006, SenSys '06.

[18]  Marco Zuniga,et al.  Analyzing the transitional region in low power wireless links , 2004, 2004 First Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks, 2004. IEEE SECON 2004..