Making a Technological Innovation Work: Collaboration to Solve Problems

How employees depend and interact with each other can affect their ability to solve problems and implement innovations. Fifty retail store personnel were interviewed on specific difficulties they had to cope with as they used their new laser scanning technology. Results indicate that cooperative goals and interaction contributed to progress, efficiency, and confidence. The study identifies antecedents to cooperative and competitive goals and categorizes and describes cooperative and competitive problem-solving behaviors and their consequences on the organization.

[1]  J. French,et al.  Overcoming Resistance to Change , 1948 .

[2]  M. Deutsch.  A Theory of Co-operation and Competition , 1949 .

[3]  J. C. Flanagan.  Psychological Bulletin THE CRITICAL INCIDENT TECHNIQUE , 2022 .

[4]  T. Oyama,et al.  Experimental studies on figural aftereffects in Japan. , 1957, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  J. March,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm , 1964 .

[6]  M. Nicholson.  The Resolution of Conflict , 1967 .

[7]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human Problem Solving. , 1973 .

[8]  V. Vroom,et al.  Leadership and decision-making , 1975 .

[9]  Dale E. Zand,et al.  Theory of Change and the Effective Use of Management Science. , 1975 .

[10]  B. K. Chesterton.  Implementing Operations Research/Management Science , 1976 .

[11]  Elaine Romanelli,et al.  Research in Organizational Behavior, Volume 1. , 1980 .

[12]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis. , 1981 .

[13]  T. Osberg,et al.  The Relative Accuracy of Self-Predictions and Judgments by Others in Psychological Assessment , 1981 .

[14]  R. H. Waterman,et al.  In Search of Excellence , 1983 .

[15]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Interdependence and Interpersonal Attraction Among Heterogeneous and Homogeneous Individuals: A Theoretical Formulation and a Meta-analysis of the Research , 1983 .

[16]  D. Tjosvold.  Cooperation Theory and Organizations , 1984 .

[17]  D. Watson,et al.  Toward a consensual structure of mood. , 1985, Psychological bulletin.

[18]  Dean Tjosvold,et al.  Implications of Controversy Research for Management , 1985 .

[19]  Dean Tjosvold,et al.  Dynamics Within Participation: An Experimental Investigation , 1985 .

[20]  Paul C. Nutt,et al.  Tactics of Implementation , 1986 .

[21]  Noel M. Tichy,et al.  The Transformational Leader. , 1988 .

[22]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Participation in decision making: When should it be used? , 1986 .

[23]  Dean Tjosvold,et al.  The Dynamics of Interdependence in Organizations , 1986 .

[24]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[25]  M. Sashkin.  Participative management remains an ethical imperative , 1986 .

[26]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Central problems in the management of innovation , 1986 .

[27]  L. Pinfield.  A Field Evaluation of Perspectives on Organizational Decision Making. , 1986 .

[28]  Dean Tjosvold,et al.  Participation: A Close Look at Its Dynamics , 1987 .

[29]  D. Funder,et al.  Differences between traits: properties associated with interjudge agreement. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[30]  Paul E. Spector.  Method variance as an artifact in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Myth or significant problem? , 1987 .

[31]  D. Tjosvold,et al.  Innovation Through Communication in an Educational Bureaucracy , 1988 .

[32]  Jeffrey Barker,et al.  CONFLICT APPROACHES OF EFFECTIVE AND INEFFECTIVE PROJECT MANAGERS: A FIELD STUDY IN A MATRIX ORGANIZATION[1] , 1988 .

[33]  D. Tjosvold.  Working Together to Get Things Done: Managing for Organizational Productivity , 1988 .

[34]  Dean Tjosvold,et al.  Team Organization: An Enduring Competitive Advantage , 1991 .