SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS, CALIBRATION, AND VALIDATIONS FOR A MULTISITE AND MULTIVARIABLE SWAT MODEL 1

The ability of a watershed model to mimic specified watershed processes is assessed through the calibration and validation process. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) watershed model was implemented in the Beaver Reservoir Watershed of Northwest Arkansas. The objectives were to: (1) provide detailed information on calibrating and applying a multisite and multivariable SWAT model; (2) conduct sensitivity analysis; and (3) perform calibration and validation at three different sites for flow, sediment, total phosphorus (TP), and nitrate-nitrogen (NO 3 -N) plus nitrite-nitrogen (NO 2 -N). Relative sensitivity analysis was conducted to identify parameters that most influenced predicted flow, sediment, and nutrient model outputs. A multiobjective function was defined that consisted of optimizing three statistics: percent relative error (RE), Nash-Sutcliffe Coefficient (R NS 2 ), and coefficient of determination (R 2 ). This function was used to successfully calibrate and validate a SWAT model of Beaver Reservoir Watershed at multi-sites while considering multivariables. Calibration and validation of the model is a key factor in reducing uncertainty and increasing user confidence in its predictive abilities, which makes the application of the model effective. Information on calibration and validation of multisite, multivariable SWAT models has been provided to assist watershed modelers in developing their models to achieve watershed management goals.

[1]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Multi-objective global optimization for hydrologic models , 1998 .

[2]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  INTEGRATION OF A BASIN‐SCALE WATER QUALITY MODEL WITH GIS , 1994 .

[3]  J. G. Arnold,et al.  PREDICTING SEDIMENT AND PHOSPHORUS LOADS IN THE ROCK RIVER BASIN USING SWAT , 2000 .

[4]  Bernard A. Engel,et al.  HYDROLOGIC PARAMETERIZATION OF WATERSHEDS FOR RUNOFF PREDICTION USING SWAT 1 , 1998 .

[5]  Keith Beven,et al.  Prophecy, reality and uncertainty in distributed hydrological modelling , 1993 .

[6]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  Regional estimation of base flow and groundwater recharge in the Upper Mississippi river basin , 2000 .

[7]  M. P. Tripathi,et al.  Identification and Prioritisation of Critical Sub-watersheds for Soil Conservation Management using the SWAT Model , 2003 .

[8]  C. T. Haan.  Parametric Uncertainty in Hydrologic Modeling , 1989 .

[9]  Indrajeet Chaubey,et al.  QUANTIFYING MODEL OUTPUT UNCERTAINTY DUE TO SPATIAL VARIABILITY OF RAINFALL 1 , 1999 .

[10]  C. T. Haan,et al.  MULTIOBJECNVE PARAMETER ESTIMATION FOR HYDROLOGIC MODELS—^MULTIOBJECTIVE PROGRAMMING , 1991 .

[11]  Stephen R. Workman,et al.  SIMULATION OF DAILY AND MONTHLY STREAM DISCHARGE FROM SMALL WATERSHEDS USING THE SWAT MODEL , 2000 .

[12]  Nicola Fohrer,et al.  An interdisciplinary modelling approach to evaluate the effects of land use change , 2002 .

[13]  John R. Williams,et al.  LARGE AREA HYDROLOGIC MODELING AND ASSESSMENT PART I: MODEL DEVELOPMENT 1 , 1998 .

[14]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  INTEGRATION OF WATERSHED TOOLS AND SWAT MODEL INTO BASINS 1 , 2002 .

[15]  J. Arnold,et al.  VALIDATION OF THE SWAT MODEL ON A LARGE RWER BASIN WITH POINT AND NONPOINT SOURCES 1 , 2001 .

[16]  Henrik Madsen,et al.  Parameter estimation in distributed hydrological catchment modelling using automatic calibration with multiple objectives , 2003 .

[17]  J. Hamlett,et al.  Hydrologic calibration of the SWAT model in a watershed containing fragipan soils , 1998 .

[18]  Steven T. Bednarz,et al.  LARGE AREA HYDROLOGIC MODELING AND ASSESSMENT PART II: MODEL APPLICATION 1 , 1998 .

[19]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[20]  J. K. Koelliker,et al.  Integrated numerical modeling for basin-wide water management: The case of the Rattlesnake Creek basin in south-central Kansas , 1999 .

[21]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  Estimating hydrologic budgets for three Illinois watersheds , 1996 .

[22]  Heinz G. Stefan,et al.  Simulating Climate Change Effects in a Minnesota Agricultural Watershed , 1998 .

[23]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  APPLICATION OF A WATERSHED MODEL TO EVALUATE MANAGEMENT EFFECTS ON POINT AND NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION , 2001 .

[24]  J. Arnold,et al.  AUTOMATED METHODS FOR ESTIMATING BASEFLOW AND GROUND WATER RECHARGE FROM STREAMFLOW RECORDS 1 , 1999 .

[25]  W. Collins,et al.  FRESH‐WATER LENS FORMATION IN AN UNCONFINED BARRIER‐ISLAND AQUIFER 1 , 1999 .

[26]  Hans-Georg Frede,et al.  SWAT-G, a version of SWAT99.2 modified for application to low mountain range catchments , 2002 .

[27]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  Water resources of the Texas Gulf Basin , 1999 .

[28]  Fayçal Bouraoui,et al.  Modelling diffuse emission and retention of nutrients in the Vantaanjoki watershed (Finland) using the SWAT model , 2003 .