The Strength of a Weak State: The Rights Revolution and the Rise of Human Resources Management Divisions1

Since the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, federal policy has revolutionized employment rights. Equal employment opportunity law, occupational safety and health legislation, and fringe benefits regulation were designed to create employee rights to equal protection, to health and safety, and to the benefits employers promise. In event‐history analyses of data from 279 organizations, this research finds that these legal changes stimulated organizations to create personnel, antidiscrimination, safety, and benefits departments to manage compliance. Yet as institutionalization proceeded, middle managers came to disassociate these new offices from policy and to justify them in purely economic terms, as part of the new human resources management paradigm. This pattern is typical in the United States, where the Constitution symbolizes government rule of industry as illegitimate. It may help to explain the long absence of a theory of the state in organizational analysis and to explain a conundrum noted by state theorists: the federal state is administratively weak but normatively strong.

[1]  Frank Dobbin,et al.  The Legalization of the Workplace , 1994, American Journal of Sociology.

[2]  J. Rockart.  Chief executives define their own data needs. , 1979, Harvard business review.

[3]  Sanford M. Jacoby,et al.  Employing Bureaucracy: Managers, Unions, and the Transformation of Work in American Industry, 1900-1945. , 1988 .

[4]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Environmental Linkages and Organizational Complexity: Public and Private Schools. , 1984 .

[5]  John D. Skrentny,et al.  The Ironies of Affirmative Action: Politics, Culture, and Justice in America , 1999 .

[6]  L. Edelman,et al.  Legal Ambiguity and Symbolic Structures: Organizational Mediation of Civil Rights Law , 1992, American Journal of Sociology.

[7]  R. Brickman,et al.  CONCEPTS OF RISK AND SAFETY IN TOXIC SUBSTANCES REGULATION: A COMPARISON OF FRANCE AND THE U.S. , 1980 .

[8]  Arne L. Kalleberg,et al.  Work Organization and Workforce Commitment: A Study of Plants and Employees in the U.S. and Japan , 1985 .

[9]  Frank Dobbin,et al.  The Expansion of Due Process in Organizations , 1988 .

[10]  R. Posner.  The Rise and Fall of Administrative Law , 1997 .

[11]  A. Stinchcombe.  Social Structure and Organizations , 2000, Political Organizations.

[12]  Nondiscrimination in employment : changing perspectives, 1963-1972 , 1973 .

[13]  J. Christensen,et al.  John W.Meyer & W.Richard Scott (eds.), Organizational Environments. Ritual and Rationality, Updated ed., Newbury Park: Sage Publications, 1992, 302 s. , 1992 .

[14]  S. Skowronek,et al.  Power and Society: Greater New York at the Turn of the Century@@@Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities, 1877-1920 , 1984 .

[15]  Joseph V. Rees.  Reforming the Workplace: A Study of Self-Regulation in Occupational Safety , 1988 .

[16]  Frank Dobbin,et al.  Equal Opportunity Law and the Construction of Internal Labor Markets , 1993, American Journal of Sociology.

[17]  T. Cox,et al.  Managing cultural diversity: implications for organizational competitiveness , 1991 .

[18]  P. R. Wyman.  Regulating for safety , 1987 .

[19]  Keith William Fairchild,et al.  The Politics of Regulation , 2012 .

[20]  Christine Gavini.  Vers un droit interne d'entreprise ? , 1997 .

[21]  Thomas A. Kochan,et al.  The Transformation of American Industrial Relations , 1988 .

[22]  HOSPITALS , 1963 .

[23]  S. Abraham,et al.  Professional Construction of the Legal Environment: The Inflated Threat of Wrongful Discharge , 1992 .

[24]  J. Mill.  A System of Logic , 1843 .

[25]  P. Blau.  A FORMAL THEORY OF DIFFERENTIATION IN ORGANIZATIONS , 1970 .

[26]  M. Boyle.  19. Equal Opportunity for Women Is Smart Business , 1977 .

[27]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[28]  Philip Selznick,et al.  Law, Society, and Industrial Justice. , 1971 .

[29]  M. Buss.  How to rank computer projects. , 1983, Harvard business review.

[30]  W. Achenbaum.  Social Security: Visions and Revisions: Frontmatter , 1986 .

[31]  P. Blau,et al.  Technology and Organization in Manufacturing , 1976 .

[32]  G. Rose.  The Structure of Organizations , 1971 .

[33]  E. Bardach,et al.  Regulation: Business Opposition vs. the Public Interest@@@Going by the Book: The Problem of Regulatory Unreasonableness. , 1983 .

[34]  Roberts Rg,et al.  Strategic integration of compensation and benefits. , 1983 .

[35]  P. Burstein,et al.  Equal Employment Opportunity and the Mobilization of Law , 1986 .

[36]  J. Sutton,et al.  The problem of control in the weak state , 1989 .

[37]  R. McCaffery.  Employee Benefit Programs: A Total Compensation Perspective , 1988 .

[38]  Marshall W. Meyer.  Organizational Structure as Signaling , 1979 .

[39]  L. Edelman,et al.  Legal Environments and Organizational Governance: The Expansion of Due Process in the American Workplace , 1990, American Journal of Sociology.

[40]  Thomas A. Kochan,et al.  Employing Bureaucracy: Managers, Unions, and the Transformation of Work in American Industry, 1900-1945. , 1987 .

[41]  C. Anderson.  OSHA and accident control through training , 1975 .

[42]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Comparing Organizational Sampling Frames , 1990 .

[43]  Jeri Spann.  Dealing Effectively with Sexual Harassment: Some Practical Lessons from One City's Experience , 1990 .

[44]  J. Sutton,et al.  The Two Faces of Governance: Responses to Legal Uncertainty in U.S. Firms, 1955 to 1985 , 1996 .

[45]  Frank Dobbin,et al.  Forging Industrial Policy: The United States, Britain, and France in the Railway Age , 1994 .

[46]  R. Rosenfeld,et al.  Discrimination, Jobs, and Politics: The Struggle for Equal Employment Opportunity in the United States since the New Deal. , 1985 .

[47]  Norma M. Riccucci,et al.  Public Personnel Management , 1992 .

[48]  E. Burke,et al.  Affirmative Action in Nine Large Companies: A Field Study. , 1985 .

[49]  K. Marino.  Conducting an Internal Compliance Review of Affirmative Action. , 1980 .

[50]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutional conditions for diffusion , 1993 .

[51]  Norman Lederer,et al.  American Welfare Capitalism, 1880-1940 , 1976 .

[52]  Peter B. Doeringer,et al.  Internal Labor Markets and Manpower Analysis , 2020 .

[53]  Cass R. Sunstein,et al.  Health-Health Tradeoffs , 1996 .

[54]  Philip Selznick.  TVA and the grass roots , 1949 .

[55]  Neil Fligstein,et al.  FROM THE TRANSFORMATION OF CORPORATE CONTROL , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[56]  O. Williamson,et al.  Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. , 1977 .

[57]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[58]  J. Sutton,et al.  The Two Faces of Governance: Responses to Legal Uncertainty in American Firms, 1955-1985 , 1996 .

[59]  J. Lovecy.  Comparative politics and the Fifth French Republic , 1992 .

[60]  Frank Dobbin,et al.  War and Peace: The Evolution of Modern Personnel Administration in U.S. Industry , 1986, American Journal of Sociology.

[61]  B. Malkiel.  Productivity: the problem behind the headlines , 1979 .

[62]  R A Weinstein,et al.  The American Hospital Association , 1994, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[63]  Robert D. Smith,et al.  Personnel management : a human resource system approach , 1982 .

[64]  Fred K. Foulkes,et al.  Personnel Policies in Large Nonunion Companies , 1980 .

[65]  D. Logue.  Legislative influence on corporate pension plans , 1979 .

[66]  D. Silverman,et al.  The Structure of Organizations. , 1971 .

[67]  W. Achenbaum.  Social security : visions and revisions , 1988 .

[68]  Pamela S. Tolbert,et al.  Institutional Sources of Change in the Formal Structure of Organizations: The Diffusion of Civil Service Reform, 1880-1935 , 1983 .