A Study on Human Factors Guidelines for Level 3 Automated Vehicles

To solve social problems such as traffic accidents caused by human driver factors and to guarantee the convenience of movement, research on the commercialization of automated vehicles is being actively conducted worldwide. In automated driving levels 2 and 3, the driver must be ready to drive at any time as the automated driving system sometimes requires manual driving by the driver. The purpose of this research is to analyze the trends in global automated vehicle guidelines and prepare guidelines for the characteristics of human factors necessary for the control rights transition system of automated vehicles. To this end, we reviewed at the guidelines for automated vehicles in the US, Germany, and Japan; ISO international standards; domestic automated vehicle standards; and the EU AdaptiVe project. In addition, a guideline is presented that can be referenced and applied by organizations related to automated vehicle manufacturing and operation. It was developed by utilizing the results of our studies on the human factors affecting the guideline of control rights transition. As national laws and regulations and continuous technology development for commercialization of automated vehicles are in progress, further research into and the revision of guidelines for safe automated vehicle production and use should be continued.

[1]  Kathrin Zeeb,et al.  What determines the take-over time? An integrated model approach of driver take-over after automated driving. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  Seung-Jun Lee,et al.  Calculation and Validation of Driver's Readiness for Regaining Control from Autonomous Driving , 2020, HCI.

[3]  Michael A. Regan New Technologies in cars: human factors and safety issues , 2004 .

[4]  Natasha Merat,et al.  Transition to manual: driver behaviour when resuming control from a highly automated vehicle , 2014 .

[5]  Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles , 2022 .

[6]  Klaus Bengler,et al.  Taking Over Control from Highly Automated Vehicles , 2014 .

[7]  Seung-Jun Lee,et al.  A study on the Effects of Providing Situation Awareness Information for the Control Authority Transition of Automated Vehicle , 2019, 2019 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC).

[8]  Jungsook Kim,et al.  A Study on the Control Authority Transition Characteristics by Driver Information , 2019, 2019 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI).

[9]  Woojin Kim,et al.  Take-over performance analysis depending on the drivers’ non-driving secondary tasks in automated vehicles , 2018, 2018 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC).

[10]  R. Happee,et al.  Automated Driving: Human-Factors Issues and Design Solutions , 2012 .

[11]  Natasha Merat,et al.  Engaging with Highly Automated Driving: To be or Not to be in the Loop? , 2017 .

[12]  Seung-Jun Lee,et al.  A Study on the Driver’s Response Performance according to Modality of Planned TOR in Automated Driving , 2019, 2019 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC).