Differences in baseline EEG measures for ADD and Normally Achieving preadolescent males

This study was designed as a replication of previous studies describing dynamic EEG differences between behaviorally dissimilar groups. This study is intended as a reference point from which other researchers can continue to establish the EEG correlates of “on-task” behavior. Eight Attention Deficit Disordered (ADD) children and eight Normally Achieving Controls (NAC) were assessed using dynamic EEG measures. Results are reported for the tasks of baseline (eyes open), reading, and drawing as recorded from FZ, CZ, PZ, C3, and C4. Significant amplitude differences between the groups were demonstrated in the theta band (4–8 hertz) during all tasks and for all sites. Amplitude differences in the beta band (12–20 hertz) were negligible. Differences between groups expressed as a ratio of theta/beta revealed significant differences mainly in the parietal region for on-task conditions. These results are discussed in relation to EEG neuro-feedback training paradigms and the importance of establishing normative “on-task” EEG values.

[1]  J. Lubar,et al.  Spectral Analysis of EEG Differences Between Children With and Without Learning Disabilities , 1985, Journal of learning disabilities.

[2]  M. Tansey.  EEG sensorimotor rhythm biofeedback training: some effects on the neurologic precursors of learning disabilities. , 1984, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[3]  M. Tansey,et al.  EMG and EEG biofeedback training in the treatment of a 10-year-old hyperactive boy with a developmental reading disorder , 1983, Biofeedback and self-regulation.

[4]  J. Lubar.  EEG biofeedback and learning disabilities , 1985 .

[5]  G. Fein,et al.  EEG spectra in 9-13-year-old boys are stable over 1-3 years. , 1984, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[6]  C. Mann,et al.  Differences in semantic event-related potentials in learning-disabled, normal, and gifted children , 1992, Biofeedback and self-regulation.

[7]  T. Gasser,et al.  Development of the EEG of school-age children and adolescents. I. Analysis of band power. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[8]  M. Tansey.  Brainwave signatures--an index reflective of the brain's functional neuroanatomy: further findings on the effect of EEG sensorimotor rhythm biofeedback training on the neurologic precursors of learning disabilities. , 1985, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[9]  J. Lubar,et al.  Operant conditioning of EEG rhythms and ritalin in the treatment of hyperkinesis , 1979, Biofeedback and self-regulation.

[10]  H. Jasper.  Report of the committee on methods of clinical examination in electroencephalography , 1958 .

[11]  C A Mann,et al.  Quantitative analysis of EEG in boys with attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder: controlled study with clinical implications. , 1992, Pediatric neurology.

[12]  J. Lubar.  Discourse on the development of EEG diagnostics and biofeedback for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorders , 1991, Biofeedback and self-regulation.

[13]  J. Lubar,et al.  Electroencephalographic biofeedback of SMR and beta for treatment of attention deficit disorders in a clinical setting , 1984, Biofeedback and self-regulation.

[14]  E. Koppitz.  The Bender Gestalt Test for Young Children , 1964 .

[15]  J. Lubar,et al.  EEG and behavioral changes in a hyperkinetic child concurrent with training of the sensorimotor rhythm (SMR) , 1976, Biofeedback and self-regulation.