Distinguishing between automaticity and attention in the processing of emotionally significant stimuli.

There is contradicting evidence as to whether irrelevant but significant emotional stimuli can be processed outside the focus of attention. In the current study, participants were asked to ignore emotional and neutral pictures while performing a competing task. In Experiment 1, orienting of attention to distracting pictures was manipulated via a peripheral cue. In Experiment 2, attentional load was varied, either leaving spare attention to process the distracting pictures or, alternatively, depleting attentional resources. Although all pictures were task irrelevant, negative pictures were found to interfere more with performance in comparison to neutral pictures. This finding suggests that processing of negative stimuli is automatic in the sense that it does not require execution of conscious monitoring. However, interference occurred only when sufficient attention was available for picture processing. Hence, processing of negative pictures was dependent on sufficient attentional resources. This suggests that processing of emotionally significant stimuli is automatic yet requires attention.

[1]  A. Henik,et al.  Task-Relevance Modulates the Effects of Peripheral Distractors , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  Joseph Tzelgov,et al.  Interactions between encoding and retrieval in the domain of sequence-learning. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  L. Pessoa,et al.  Load-dependent modulation of affective picture processing , 2005, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[4]  Thomas M. Moerland,et al.  Fate of unattended fearful faces in the amygdala is determined by both attentional resources and cognitive modulation , 2005, NeuroImage.

[5]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Visual awareness and the detection of fearful faces. , 2005, Emotion.

[6]  L. Pessoa To what extent are emotional visual stimuli processed without attention and awareness? , 2005, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[7]  D. Derryberry,et al.  Attentional interference effects of emotional pictures: threat, negativity, or arousal? , 2005, Emotion.

[8]  P. Schyns,et al.  A mechanism for impaired fear recognition after amygdala damage , 2005, Nature.

[9]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Repetition suppression of faces is modulated by emotion. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  François Mauguière,et al.  Early Amygdala Reaction to Fear Spreading in Occipital, Temporal, and Frontal Cortex A Depth Electrode ERP Study in Human , 2004, Neuron.

[11]  G. Ben-Shakhar,et al.  Dissociations of personally significant and task-relevant distractors inside and outside the focus of attention: a combined behavioral and psychophysiological study. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[12]  A. Anderson,et al.  Neural Correlates of the Automatic Processing of Threat Facial Signals , 2022 .

[13]  Anja Ischebeck,et al.  On the relative speed account of number-size interference in comparative judgments of numerals. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  R. Dolan,et al.  Distinct spatial frequency sensitivities for processing faces and emotional expressions , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[15]  F. McGlone,et al.  The role of spatial attention in the processing of facial expression: An ERP study of rapid brain responses to six basic emotions , 2003, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[16]  M. Eimer,et al.  The processing of emotional facial expression is gated by spatial attention: evidence from event-related brain potentials. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[17]  H. Aarts,et al.  On Wildebeests and Humans , 2003, Psychological science.

[18]  R. Dolan,et al.  Modulation of spatial attention by fear-conditioned stimuli: an event-related fMRI study , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Neural processing of emotional faces requires attention , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  K. Luan Phan,et al.  Functional Neuroanatomy of Emotion: A Meta-Analysis of Emotion Activation Studies in PET and fMRI , 2002, NeuroImage.

[21]  E. Fox,et al.  Attentional bias for threat: Evidence for delayed disengagement from emotional faces , 2002, Cognition & emotion.

[22]  Arne Öhman,et al.  Automaticity and the Amygdala: Nonconscious Responses to Emotional Faces , 2002 .

[23]  M. Eimer,et al.  An ERP study on the time course of emotional face processing , 2002, Neuroreport.

[24]  J. Eastwood,et al.  Differential attentional guidance by unattended faces expressing positive and negative emotion , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  L. Weiskrantz,et al.  Differential extrageniculostriate and amygdala responses to presentation of emotional faces in a cortically blind field. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[26]  R. Dolan,et al.  Effects of Attention and Emotion on Face Processing in the Human Brain An Event-Related fMRI Study , 2001, Neuron.

[27]  P. Lang,et al.  Fear and anxiety: animal models and human cognitive psychophysiology. , 2000, Journal of affective disorders.

[28]  R. Knight,et al.  Transient interference of right hemispheric function due to automatic emotional processing , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[29]  Joseph E LeDoux Emotion Circuits in the Brain , 2000 .

[30]  K. Mogg,et al.  Some methodological issues in assessing attentional biases for threatening faces in anxiety: a replication study using a modified version of the probe detection task. , 1999, Behaviour research and therapy.

[31]  R. Dolan,et al.  A subcortical pathway to the right amygdala mediating "unseen" fear. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  H. Pape,et al.  Direct synaptic connections of axons from superior colliculus with identified thalamo‐amygdaloid projection neurons in the rat: Possible substrates of a subcortical visual pathway to the amygdala , 1999, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[33]  P. Lang,et al.  International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Instruction Manual and Affective Ratings (Tech. Rep. No. A-4) , 1999 .

[34]  A. Ohman,et al.  Fear appears fast: temporal course of startle reflex potentiation in animal fearful subjects. , 1999, Psychophysiology.

[35]  R. Dolan,et al.  Conscious and unconscious emotional learning in the human amygdala , 1998, Nature.

[36]  S. Rauch,et al.  Masked Presentations of Emotional Facial Expressions Modulate Amygdala Activity without Explicit Knowledge , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  J. Lupiáñez,et al.  Does IOR occur in discrimination tasks? Yes, it does, but later , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[38]  J Tzelgov,et al.  Specifying the relations between automaticity and consciousness: a theoretical note. , 1997, Consciousness and cognition.

[39]  A. Henik,et al.  Automaticity and consciousness: is perceiving the word necessary for reading it? , 1997, The American journal of psychology.

[40]  T. Dalgleish,et al.  The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology. , 1996, Psychological bulletin.

[41]  G. Logan,et al.  Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention , 1996 .

[42]  S. Yantis 2. Attentional capture in vision , 1996 .

[43]  N. Lavie Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[44]  T. Carr,et al.  Inhibitory Processes in Attention, Memory and Language , 1994 .

[45]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Capacity demands of automatic processes in semantic priming , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[46]  R. Rafal,et al.  The neurology of inhibition: Integrating controlled and automatic processes. , 1994 .

[47]  A. Henik,et al.  Controlling Stroop effects by manipulating expectations for color words , 1992, Memory & cognition.

[48]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Controlling Stroop interference: Evidence from a bilingual task. , 1990 .

[49]  J. Bargh Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition. , 1989 .

[50]  Gordon D. Logan,et al.  On the ability to inhibit simple thoughts and actions: II. Stop-signal studies of repetition priming. , 1985 .

[51]  D. Mackinnon,et al.  The effects of effort on stroop interference. , 1985, Acta psychologica.

[52]  M. Posner,et al.  Components of visual orienting , 1984 .

[53]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Varieties of attention , 1984 .

[54]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Tests of the automaticity of reading: dilution of Stroop effects by color-irrelevant stimuli. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[55]  A. Henik,et al.  Is three greater than five: The relation between physical and semantic size in comparison tasks , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[56]  William C. Ogden,et al.  Letter encoding is an obligatory but capacity-demanding operation. , 1981 .

[57]  G. Logan Attention and automaticity in Stroop and priming tasks: Theory and data , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[58]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[59]  Douglas G. Lowe,et al.  Strategies, context, and the mechanism of response inhibition , 1979 .

[60]  L. Hasher,et al.  Automatic and effortful processes in memory. , 1979 .

[61]  G. Logan,et al.  When it helps to be misled: Facilitative effects of increasing the frequency of conflicting stimuli in a Stroop-like task , 1979 .