Danish study of Non-Invasive Testing in Coronary Artery Disease 3 (Dan-NICAD 3): study design of a controlled study on optimal diagnostic strategy
暂无分享,去创建一个
M. Nyegaard | J. Ejlersen | L. Gormsen | S. Winther | J. Westra | N. Holm | E. Christiansen | L. Knudsen | M. Böttcher | P. D. Rohde | N. Hansson | A. Eftekhari | P. L. Møller | H. Søndergaard | J. Mortensen | G. Brix | J. Dahl | Laust Dupont Rasmussen | Salma Raghad Karim Abdulzahra | G. S. Brix | Jesper Mortensen
[1] S. Petersen,et al. Second-Line Myocardial Perfusion Imaging to Detect Obstructive Stenosis: Head-to-Head Comparison of CMR and PET. , 2023, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.
[2] Deepak L. Bhatt,et al. 2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR Guideline for the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Chest Pain: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. , 2021, Circulation.
[3] E. Hess,et al. 2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR Guideline for the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Chest Pain: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. , 2021, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[4] G. Campo,et al. Reproducibility of Quantitative Flow Ratio: The QREP Study. , 2021, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.
[5] K. Stefánsson,et al. Polygenic Risk Score–Enhanced Risk Stratification of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Stable Chest Pain , 2021, Circulation. Genomic and precision medicine.
[6] W. Wijns,et al. Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative flow ratio for assessment of coronary stenosis significance from a single angiographic view: A novel method based on bifurcation fractal law , 2021, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions.
[7] H. Bøtker,et al. Incorporating Coronary Calcification Into Pre-Test Assessment of the Likelihood of Coronary Artery Disease. , 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[8] H. Bøtker,et al. One-step anatomic and function testing by cardiac CT versus second-line functional testing in symptomatic patients with coronary artery stenosis: head-to-head comparison of CT-derived fractional flow reserve and myocardial perfusion imaging. , 2020, EuroIntervention.
[9] H. Bøtker,et al. Validation of the European Society of Cardiology pre-test probability model for obstructive coronary artery disease. , 2020, European heart journal.
[10] M. Lubberink,et al. EANM procedural guidelines for PET/CT quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging , 2020, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[11] M. Freitag,et al. Quantitative myocardial perfusion 82Rb-PET assessed by hybrid PET/coronary-CT: Normal values and diagnostic performance , 2020, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.
[12] H. Bøtker,et al. Prediction of Coronary Revascularization in Stable Angina: Comparison of FFRCT With CMR Stress Perfusion Imaging. , 2020, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.
[13] Sean M. O'Brien,et al. Health-Status Outcomes with Invasive or Conservative Care in Coronary Disease. , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.
[14] Sean M. O'Brien,et al. Initial Invasive or Conservative Strategy for Stable Coronary Disease. , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.
[15] K. Stefánsson,et al. Genetic Risk of Coronary Artery Disease, Features of Atherosclerosis, and Coronary Plaque Burden , 2020, Journal of the American Heart Association.
[16] Marco Valgimigli,et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. , 2019, European heart journal.
[17] Jeroen J. Bax,et al. 1-Year Impact on Medical Practice and Clinical Outcomes of FFRCT: The ADVANCE Registry. , 2020, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.
[18] Jeroen J. Bax,et al. Impact of a decreasing pre-test probability on the performance of diagnostic tests for coronary artery disease. , 2019, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.
[19] E. Barbato,et al. Measurement of Hyperemic Pullback Pressure Gradients to Characterize Patterns of Coronary Atherosclerosis. , 2019, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[20] H. Bøtker,et al. Danish study of Non-Invasive testing in Coronary Artery Disease 2 (Dan-NICAD 2): Study design for a controlled study of diagnostic accuracy. , 2019, American heart journal.
[21] Yaiza Beatriz Molero-Díez,et al. Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction , 2019, Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology.
[22] H. Bøtker,et al. Influence of Cardiac CT based disease severity and clinical symptoms on the diagnostic performance of myocardial perfusion , 2019, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.
[23] Charles A. Taylor,et al. Comparison of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography, Fractional Flow Reserve, and Perfusion Imaging for Ischemia Diagnosis. , 2019, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[24] S. Hess,et al. Prospective Comparison of FFR Derived From Coronary CT Angiography With SPECT Perfusion Imaging in Stable Coronary Artery Disease: The ReASSESS Study. , 2018, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.
[25] Kristian Thygesen,et al. Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018). , 2018, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[26] Jeroen J. Bax,et al. Diagnostic performance of angiography-derived fractional flow reserve: a systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis , 2018, European heart journal.
[27] R. Arsanjani,et al. Comparison of Computed Tomography derived Fractional Flow Reserve to invasive Fractional Flow Reserve in Diagnosis of Functional Coronary Stenosis: A Meta-Analysis , 2018, Scientific Reports.
[28] Mary E. Haas,et al. Genome-wide polygenic scores for common diseases identify individuals with risk equivalent to monogenic mutations , 2018, Nature Genetics.
[29] Jeroen J. Bax,et al. The performance of non-invasive tests to rule-in and rule-out significant coronary artery stenosis in patients with stable angina: a meta-analysis focused on post-test disease probability , 2018, European heart journal.
[30] H. Bøtker,et al. Diagnosing coronary artery disease after a positive coronary computed tomography angiography: the Dan-NICAD open label, parallel, head to head, randomized controlled diagnostic accuracy trial of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy , 2018, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.
[31] G. Ginsburg,et al. High-Sensitivity Troponin I and Coronary Computed Tomography in Symptomatic Outpatients With Suspected CAD: Insights From the PROMISE Trial. , 2018, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.
[32] S. Thom,et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention in stable angina (ORBITA): a double-blind, randomised controlled trial , 2018, The Lancet.
[33] J. Leipsic,et al. Comparison of Coronary CT Angiography, SPECT, PET, and Hybrid Imaging for Diagnosis of Ischemic Heart Disease Determined by Fractional Flow Reserve , 2017, JAMA cardiology.
[34] G. Dinant,et al. Frequency of chest pain in primary care, diagnostic tests performed and final diagnoses , 2017, Heart.
[35] I. Meredith,et al. Noninvasive CT-Derived FFR Based on Structural and Fluid Analysis: A Comparison With Invasive FFR for Detection of Functionally Significant Stenosis. , 2017, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.
[36] J. Januzzi,et al. A Clinical and Biomarker Scoring System to Predict the Presence of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[37] H. Bøtker,et al. Danish study of Non-Invasive testing in Coronary Artery Disease (Dan-NICAD): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial , 2016, Trials.
[38] Jianxin Shi,et al. Developing and evaluating polygenic risk prediction models for stratified disease prevention , 2016, Nature Reviews Genetics.
[39] A. Lammertsma,et al. In vivo assessment of myocardial viability after acute myocardial infarction: A head-to-head comparison of the perfusable tissue index by PET and delayed contrast-enhanced CMR , 2016, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.
[40] P. Visscher,et al. Modeling Linkage Disequilibrium Increases Accuracy of Polygenic Risk Scores , 2015, bioRxiv.
[41] Gian Franco Gensini,et al. Detection of Significant Coronary Artery Disease by Noninvasive Anatomical and Functional Imaging , 2015, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.
[42] A. Kono,et al. Fractional flow reserve computed from noninvasive CT angiography data: diagnostic performance of an on-site clinician-operated computational fluid dynamics algorithm. , 2015, Radiology.
[43] Jack Euesden,et al. PRSice: Polygenic Risk Score software , 2014, Bioinform..
[44] A. Lammertsma,et al. Quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion in the detection of significant coronary artery disease: cutoff values and diagnostic accuracy of quantitative [(15)O]H2O PET imaging. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[45] K. Anstrom,et al. PROspective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of chest pain: rationale and design of the PROMISE trial. , 2014, American heart journal.
[46] Juhani Knuuti,et al. Absolute flow or myocardial flow reserve for the detection of significant coronary artery disease? , 2014, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.
[47] R. Blankstein,et al. Preserved Coronary Flow Reserve Effectively Excludes High-Risk Coronary Artery Disease on Angiography , 2014, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[48] W. Vach,et al. Hybrid CT angiography and quantitative 15O-water PET for assessment of coronary artery disease: comparison with quantitative coronary angiography , 2013, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[49] A. Kosinski. A weighted generalized score statistic for comparison of predictive values of diagnostic tests , 2013, Statistics in medicine.
[50] M. Lubberink,et al. Hybrid Imaging Using Quantitative H215O PET and CT-Based Coronary Angiography for the Detection of Coronary Artery Disease , 2013, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[51] A. Dunning,et al. Effect of image quality on diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive fractional flow reserve: results from the prospective multicenter international DISCOVER-FLOW study. , 2012, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.
[52] H. Sipilä,et al. Cardiac Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging Accurately Detects Anatomically and Functionally Significant Coronary Artery Disease , 2010, Circulation.
[53] M. Lubberink,et al. Automatic generation of absolute myocardial blood flow images using [15O]H2O and a clinical PET/CT scanner , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[54] P. Harris,et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap) - A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support , 2009, J. Biomed. Informatics.
[55] Choi-Kyu Park,et al. Prevalence-based Interpretation of Predictive Values of Diagnostic Tests , 2009 .
[56] D. Berman,et al. SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary computed tomographic angiography. , 2009, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.
[57] Ran Klein,et al. Quantification of myocardial blood flow with 82Rb dynamic PET imaging , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[58] Raymond Kwong,et al. Diagnostic accuracy of rubidium-82 myocardial perfusion imaging with hybrid positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the detection of coronary artery disease. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[59] E. Ficaro,et al. American Society of Nuclear Cardiology information statement: Standardized reporting matrix for radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging , 2006, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.
[60] M. Cerqueira,et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. , 2002, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.
[61] M. Cerqueira,et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. , 2002, Circulation.
[62] N. Mullani,et al. A retrospective study of the diagnostic accuracy of a community hospital-based PET center for the detection of coronary artery disease using rubidium-82. , 1994, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[63] A Bol,et al. Coronary flow reserve calculated from pressure measurements in humans. Validation with positron emission tomography. , 1994, Circulation.
[64] D E Kuhl,et al. Comparison of rubidium-82 positron emission tomography and thallium-201 SPECT imaging for detection of coronary artery disease. , 1991, The American journal of cardiology.
[65] W J MacIntyre,et al. A prospective comparison of rubidium-82 PET and thallium-201 SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging utilizing a single dipyridamole stress in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. , 1990, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[66] H. Bøtker,et al. Prediction of Coronary Revascularization in Stable Angina , 2019 .
[67] J. Reiber,et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of a Fast Computational Approach to Derive Fractional Flow Reserve From Coronary CT Angiography. , 2019, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.