The role of face shape and pigmentation in other-race face perception: An electrophysiological study

Adult observers generally find it difficult to recognize and distinguish faces that belong to categories with which they have limited visual experience. One aspect of this phenomenon is commonly known as the "Other-Race Effect" (ORE) since this behavior is typically highly evident in the perception of faces belonging to ethnic or racial groups other than that of the observer. This acquired disadvantage in face recognition likely results from highly specific "tuning" of the underlying representation of facial appearance, leading to efficient processing of commonly seen faces at the expense of poor generalization to other face categories. In the current study we used electrophysiological (event-related potentials or ERPs) and behavioral measures of performance to characterize face processing in racial categories defined by dissociable shape and pigmentation information. Our goal was to examine the specificity of the representation of facial appearance in more detail by investigating how race-specific face shape and pigmentation separately modulated neural responses previously implicated in face processing, the N170 and N250 components. We found that both components were modulated by skin color, independent of face shape, but that only the N250 exhibited sensitivity to face shape. Moreover, the N250 appears to only respond differentially to the skin color of upright faces, showing a lack of color sensitivity for inverted faces.

[1]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Tracking the Timecourse of Social Perception: The Effects of Racial Cues on Event-Related Brain Potentials , 2004, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[2]  H Begleiter,et al.  Event-related brain potentials differentiate priming and recognition to familiar and unfamiliar faces. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[3]  P. Bennett,et al.  Inversion Leads to Quantitative, Not Qualitative, Changes in Face Processing , 2004, Current Biology.

[4]  James W. Tanaka,et al.  Activation of Preexisting and Acquired Face Representations: The N250 Event-related Potential as an Index of Face Familiarity , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  Benjamin Balas,et al.  The Effect of Real-World Personal Familiarity on the Speed of Face Information Processing , 2007, PloS one.

[6]  V. Goffaux,et al.  Spatio-temporal localization of the face inversion effect: an event-related potentials study , 1999, Biological Psychology.

[7]  T Valentine,et al.  The effect of race, inversion and encoding activity upon face recognition. , 1986, Acta psychologica.

[8]  Galit Yovel,et al.  The Role of Skin Colour in Face Recognition , 2009, Perception.

[9]  Thomas Vetter,et al.  A morphable model for the synthesis of 3D faces , 1999, SIGGRAPH.

[10]  R. Malpass,et al.  Recognition for faces of own and other race. , 1969, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  A. Burton,et al.  N250r: a face-selective brain response to stimulus repetitions , 2004, Neuroreport.

[12]  D. Levin,et al.  Distortions in the perceived lightness of faces: the role of race categories. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[13]  Michael J. Bernstein,et al.  The Cross-Category Effect , 2007, Psychological science.

[14]  Szonya Durant,et al.  A labile representation of spatial information in the visual cortex , 2010 .

[15]  M. Herrmann,et al.  The other-race effect for face perception: an event-related potential study , 2007, Journal of Neural Transmission.

[16]  B. Rossion,et al.  Event-related potentials and time course of the ‘other-race’ face classification advantage , 2004, Neuroreport.

[17]  T. Ito,et al.  The influence of processing objectives on the perception of faces: An ERP study of race and gender perception , 2005, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[18]  J. Brigham,et al.  Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review , 2001 .

[19]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological Studies of Face Perception in Humans , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Holistic Processing Is Finely Tuned for Faces of One's Own Race , 2006, Psychological science.

[21]  D. Levin Race as a visual feature: using visual search and perceptual discrimination tasks to understand face categories and the cross-race recognition deficit. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[22]  P. Sinha,et al.  Real-World Face Recognition: The Importance of Surface Reflectance Properties , 2007, Perception.

[23]  Stefan R Schweinberger,et al.  Age-related slowing in face and name recognition: evidence from event-related brain potentials. , 2002, Psychology and aging.

[24]  T. Ito,et al.  Race and gender on the brain: electrocortical measures of attention to the race and gender of multiply categorizable individuals. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  R. Rosenholtz,et al.  The effect of background color on asymmetries in color search. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[26]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Inversion and Contrast Polarity Reversal Affect both Encoding and Recognition Processes of Unfamiliar Faces: A Repetition Study Using ERPs , 2002, NeuroImage.

[27]  Lara J Pierce,et al.  The neural plasticity of other-race face recognition , 2009, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[28]  Frederic Dick,et al.  Differential Lateralization for Words and Faces: Category or Psychophysics? , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[29]  G. Rhodes,et al.  An own-race advantage for components as well as configurations in face recognition , 2008, Cognition.

[30]  James W Tanaka,et al.  An Encoding Advantage for Own-Race versus Other-Race Faces , 2003, Perception.

[31]  Christian A. Meissner,et al.  Social and Cognitive Factors Affecting the Own-Race Bias in Whites , 2000 .

[32]  James W. Tanaka,et al.  A Reevaluation of the Electrophysiological Correlates of Expert Object Processing , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[33]  R. Yin Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[34]  O. Pascalis,et al.  Three-month-olds, but not newborns, prefer own-race faces. , 2005, Developmental science.

[35]  M. Tarr,et al.  The N170 occipito‐temporal component is delayed and enhanced to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: an electrophysiological account of face‐specific processes in the human brain , 2000, Neuroreport.

[36]  T. Valentine The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology a Unified Account of the Effects of Distinctiveness, Inversion, and Race in Face Recognition , 2022 .

[37]  S. L. Sporer,et al.  Recognizing faces of other ethnic groups: An integration of theories. , 2001 .

[38]  R. Rosenholtz Search asymmetries? What search asymmetries? , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[39]  S. Schweinberger,et al.  Expertise and own-race bias in face processing: an event-related potential study , 2008, Neuroreport.

[40]  T. Ito,et al.  Ambiguity and the Timecourse of Racial Perception , 2006 .

[41]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[42]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Modulation of event‐related potentials by prototypical and atypical faces , 2000, Neuroreport.

[43]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Early lateralization and orientation tuning for face, word, and object processing in the visual cortex , 2003, NeuroImage.

[44]  Olivier Corneille,et al.  When memory shifts toward more typical category exemplars: accentuation effects in the recollection of ethnically ambiguous faces. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[45]  Jesse S. Husk,et al.  Inverting houses and textures: Investigating the characteristics of learned inversion effects , 2007, Vision Research.

[46]  M. Tarr,et al.  Becoming a “Greeble” Expert: Exploring Mechanisms for Face Recognition , 1997, Vision Research.

[47]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  N170 or N1? Spatiotemporal differences between object and face processing using ERPs. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[48]  B Renault,et al.  Face versus non-face object perception and the ‘other-race’ effect: a spatio-temporal event-related potential study , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[49]  I. Biederman,et al.  Is Pigmentation Important for Face Recognition? Evidence from Contrast Negation , 2006, Perception.

[50]  Markus Kiefer,et al.  A holistic account of the own-race effect in face recognition: evidence from a cross-cultural study , 2004, Cognition.

[51]  Clara D. Martin,et al.  Controlling for interstimulus perceptual variance abolishes N170 face selectivity , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[52]  A. Little,et al.  Category contingent aftereffects for faces of different races, ages and species , 2008, Cognition.

[53]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Priming Race in Biracial Observers Affects Visual Search , 2022 .

[54]  Richard Russell,et al.  Sex, Beauty, and the Relative Luminance of Facial Features , 2003, Perception.

[55]  Joshua Correll,et al.  Event-related potentials and the decision to shoot: The role of threat perception and cognitive control , 2006 .

[56]  P. Hancock,et al.  Equally attending but still not seeing: An eye-tracking study of change detection in own- and other-race faces , 2007 .

[57]  Travis L. Dixon,et al.  Skin tone, crime news, and social reality judgments: Priming the stereotype of the dark and dangerous black criminal. , 2005 .

[58]  H. Ellis,et al.  Perceiving and remembering faces , 1983 .

[59]  Otto H. MacLin,et al.  Racial categorization of faces: The ambiguous race face effect. , 2001 .

[60]  A. Freire,et al.  The Face-Inversion Effect as a Deficit in the Encoding of Configural Information: Direct Evidence , 2000, Perception.

[61]  A. Burton,et al.  Event-related brain potential evidence for a response of inferior temporal cortex to familiar face repetitions. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.