Establishment of Social Status without Individual Discrimination in the Cricket

Agonistic behavior in crickets was investigated to understand socially adaptive behavior, which assists with the understanding of the design of an artificial autonomous system in a social organization. Agonistic behavior between male crickets is released by the perception of cuticular substances of conspecific males. The degree of aggressiveness in crickets escalates from antennal fencing to tactical contact until one male quits fighting, at which time social status is established. The question of whether crickets are able to recognize one another to establish social status in an agonist interaction is worthy of pursuit. However, it would be difficult to conduct an experiment to explore this issue while using many individuals. Hence, we examined the social organization among male crickets using a two-step approach: (i) an experiment involving a simulated cricket behavior model and (ii) an experiment involving a behavior experiment using real animals. Our results suggest that crickets establish social status without recognition of their opponents.

[1]  E. Tibbetts Visual signals of individual identity in the wasp Polistes fuscatus , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  K. Schildberger,et al.  The fight and flight responses of crickets depleted of biogenic amines. , 2000, Journal of neurobiology.

[3]  Hitoshi Aonuma,et al.  Effects of Previous Experience on the Agonistic Behaviour of Male Crickets, Gryllus bimaculatus , 2006, Zoological science.

[4]  Brian T. Forschler,et al.  Factors that Affect Aggression Among the Worker Caste of Reticulitermes spp. Subterranean Termites (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) , 1999, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[5]  Charlotte K. Hemelrijk,et al.  Self‐organizing properties of primate social behavior: A hypothesis for intersexual rank overlap in chimpanzees and bonobos , 2003 .

[6]  P. Pamilo,et al.  Nestmate recognition and the genetic relatedness of nests in the ant Formica pratensis , 1998, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[7]  E. Kravitz,et al.  Aggression in invertebrates , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[8]  Stefan Sieben,et al.  Nestmate recognition in social wasps: manipulation of hydrocarbon profiles induces aggression in the European hornet , 2002, Naturwissenschaften.

[9]  Hajime Asama,et al.  A Neuromodulation Model for Adaptive Behavior Selection by the Cricket - Nitric Oxide (NO)/Cyclic Guanosine MonoPhosphate (cGMP) Cascade Model - , 2007, J. Robotics Mechatronics.

[10]  Maja J. Matarić,et al.  Dominance interactions, spatial dynamics and emergent reciprocity in a virtual world , 1996 .

[11]  E. Tibbetts,et al.  Complex social behaviour can select for variability in visual features: a case study in Polistes wasps , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  A. Aonuma,et al.  Role of NO signaling in switching mechanisms in the nervous system of insect , 2004, SICE 2004 Annual Conference.

[13]  Andrew B. Barron,et al.  Worker policing in the bee Apis florea , 2001, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[14]  Jun Ota,et al.  Foraging Task of Multiple Mobile Robots in a Dynamic Environment Using Adaptive Behavior in Crickets , 2007, J. Robotics Mechatronics.

[15]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Dominance orders in animal societies: The self-organization hypothesis revisited , 1999, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[16]  M. Hisada,et al.  Discrimination of Conspecific Individuals via Cuticular Pheromones by Males of the Cricket Gryllus bimaculatus , 2005, Zoological science.

[17]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Mathematical model of self-organizing hierarchies in animal societies , 1996 .