Tests of a holistic chunking model of sentence memory through analyses of noun intrusions

A holistic chunking model of sentence acquisition and retrieval is described and tested by a prompted sentence recall procedure. In this procedure, subjects first study a list of unrelated sentences and later receive single-word prompts to cue sentence recall. The model assumes that (1) words in sentences are grouped into propositions during acquisition, (2) the propositions are encoded holistically and later retrieved as units, and (3) the retrieval of one proposition does not automatically lead to recovery of other propositions in a sentence. The model was tested by patterns of intrusion errors. Noun intrusions for elements within a recovered proposition were always related conceptually to the presented nouns, even when a noun violated the co-occurrence restrictions of the verb (e.g., the tray loved the house). In contrast, noun intrusions for elements outside of the scope of a recovered proposition were often unrelated to presented nouns. It was argued that patterns of intrusion errors provide more appropriate tests for sentence structure than do quantitative patterns of correct recall, at least from the framework of the holistic chunking model.

[1]  P. Thorndyke Conceptual complexity and imagery in comprehension and memory , 1975 .

[2]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Some structural properties of simple active and passive sentences , 1965 .

[3]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[4]  Arthur L. Blumenthal,et al.  Promoted recall of sentences. , 1967 .

[5]  M. Singer,et al.  Thematic Structure and the Integration of Linguistic Information. , 1976 .

[6]  W. Brewer,et al.  Memory for ideas: Synonym substitution , 1975, Memory & cognition.

[7]  E. Tulving Ecphoric processes in recall and recognition. , 1976 .

[8]  Daniel G Bobrow,et al.  On data-limited and resource-limited processes , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[9]  J. Fodor,et al.  The Psychology of Language , 1974 .

[10]  Richard C. Anderson Substance Recall of Sentences , 1974 .

[11]  H. H. Clark The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. , 1973 .

[12]  G. Kempen [Review of the book Explorations in cognition by D. Norman, D. Rumelhart and the LNR Research Group] , 1977 .

[13]  Solomon E. Asch,et al.  A reformulation of the problem of associations. , 1969 .

[14]  Gordon H. Bower,et al.  On an associative trace for sentence memory , 1971 .

[15]  G. Miller,et al.  Language and Perception , 1976 .

[16]  D. Green The effects of task on the representation of sentences , 1975 .

[17]  H. H. Clark,et al.  What's new? Acquiring New information as a process in comprehension , 1974 .

[18]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[19]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Limited Processing Capacity Constrains the Storage of Unrelated Sets of Words and Retrieval from Natural Categories. , 1978 .

[20]  Donald J. Foss,et al.  Memory for Sentences: Implications for Human Associative Memory. , 1975 .

[21]  B. Hayes-Roth Evolution of Cognitive Structures and Processes. , 1977 .

[22]  Robert A. Boakes,et al.  Prompted recall of sentences , 1967 .

[23]  Barbara Hayes-Roth,et al.  The Prominence of Lexical Information in Memory Representations of Meaning. , 1977 .

[24]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  On putting apples into bottles — A problem of polysemy , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[25]  Robert F. Stanners,et al.  Frequency and visual quality in a word-nonword classification task , 1975 .

[26]  J. Katz,et al.  An integrated theory of linguistic descriptions , 1964 .

[27]  W. Kintsch,et al.  The representation of meaning in memory , 1974 .

[28]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  वाक्यविन्यास का सैद्धान्तिक पक्ष = Aspects of the theory of syntax , 1965 .

[29]  B. Murdock Human memory: Theory and data. , 1975 .

[30]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Explorations in Cognition , 1975 .

[31]  Eric Wanner,et al.  On remembering, forgetting, and understanding sentences: A study of the deep structure hypothesis , 1974 .

[32]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[33]  John R. Anderson Language, Memory, and Thought , 1976 .

[34]  Charles J. Fillmore,et al.  THE CASE FOR CASE. , 1967 .

[35]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Psychology and language : an introduction to psycholinguistics , 1979 .

[36]  T. E. Moore,et al.  Speeded recognition of ungrammaticality , 1972 .

[37]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  Computer Models of Thought and Language , 1974 .

[38]  J. Jenkins Remember that old theory of memory? Well, forget it. , 1974 .

[39]  Allan Paivio,et al.  Integrative processing of concrete and abstract sentences , 1977 .

[40]  Marcel Adam Just,et al.  Models of sentence verification and linguistic comprehension , 1976 .

[41]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Imagery, propositions, and the form of internal representations , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[42]  George A. Miller,et al.  A psychological method to investigate verbal concepts , 1969 .

[43]  Barbara Anne Dosher,et al.  The retrieval of sentences from memory: A speed-accuracy study , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[44]  G. Mandler Organization and Memory , 1967 .

[45]  J. Fodor,et al.  The Language of Thought , 1980 .

[46]  G. Bower,et al.  Human Associative Memory , 1973 .

[47]  James G. Greeno,et al.  8 – How Associations Are Memorized1 , 1970 .