Mobile Phone Emissions Modulate Brain Excitability in Patients with Focal Epilepsy

BACKGROUND Electromagnetic fields (EMFs) emitted by mobile phones had been shown to increase cortical excitability in healthy subjects following 45 min of continuous exposure on the ipsilateral hemisphere. OBJECTIVE Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS), the current study assessed the effects of acute exposure to mobile phone EMFs on the cortical excitability in patients with focal epilepsy. METHODS Ten patients with cryptogenic focal epilepsy originating outside the primary motor area (M1) were studied. Paired-pulse TMS were applied to the M1 of both the hemisphere ipsilateral (IH) and contralateral (CH) to the epileptic focus before and immediately after real/sham exposure to the GSM-EMFs (45 min). The TMS study was carried out in all subjects in three different experimental sessions (IH and CH exposure, sham), 1 week apart, according to a crossover, double-blind and counter-balanced paradigm. RESULTS The present study clearly demonstrated that an acute and relatively prolonged exposure to GSM-EMFs modulates cortical excitability in patients affected by focal epilepsy; however, in contrast to healthy subjects, these effects were evident only after EMFs exposure over the hemisphere contralateral to the epileptic focus (CH). They were characterized by a significant cortical excitability increase in the exposed hemisphere paired with slight excitability decrease in the other one (IH). Both sham and real EMFs exposure of the IH did not affect brain excitability. CONCLUSION Present results suggest a significant interaction between the brain excitability changes induced by EMFs and the epileptic focus, which eliminated the excitability enhancing effects of EMFs evident only in the CH.

[1]  B. Day,et al.  Interhemispheric inhibition of the human motor cortex. , 1992, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  M. Hallett,et al.  Noninvasive mapping of muscle representations in human motor cortex. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[3]  Paolo Maria Rossini,et al.  Mobile phone emissions and human brain excitability , 2006, Annals of neurology.

[4]  A. Volterra,et al.  Reactive Oxygen Species Inhibit High‐Affinity Glutamate Uptake: Molecular Mechanism and Neuropathological Implications , 1994, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[5]  D. Rubinow,et al.  Effects of ovarian hormones on human cortical excitability , 2002, Annals of neurology.

[6]  P. Rossini,et al.  Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[7]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  How Many Subjects Constitute a Study? , 1999, NeuroImage.

[8]  C. Boccagni,et al.  Cortical excitability in drug-naive patients with partial epilepsy , 2004, Neurology.

[9]  M. Ikeda,et al.  Oxidative neuronal death caused by glutamate uptake inhibition in cultured hippocampal neurons , 2003, Journal of neuroscience research.

[10]  Robert Chen,et al.  Two phases of short-interval intracortical inhibition , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  N. Kuster,et al.  Exposure to pulse‐modulated radio frequency electromagnetic fields affects regional cerebral blood flow , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.

[12]  Babak Boroojerdi,et al.  Pharmacologic Influences on TMS Effects , 2002, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[13]  Andrew A. Marino,et al.  The Effects of Mobile-Phone Electromagnetic Fields on Brain Electrical Activity: A Critical Analysis of the Literature , 2009, Electromagnetic biology and medicine.

[14]  B. Meyer,et al.  Inhibitory and excitatory interhemispheric transfers between motor cortical areas in normal humans and patients with abnormalities of the corpus callosum. , 1995, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[15]  Ömer Akyol,et al.  Effects of electromagnetic radiation from a cellular telephone on the oxidant and antioxidant levels in rabbits , 2002, Cell biochemistry and function.

[16]  Frank Telang,et al.  Effects of cell phone radiofrequency signal exposure on brain glucose metabolism. , 2011, JAMA.

[17]  H. Bostock,et al.  Two phases of intracortical inhibition revealed by transcranial magnetic threshold tracking , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  S. Rossi,et al.  Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[19]  Massimo Cincotta,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation and epilepsy , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[20]  R. Malenka,et al.  The influence of prior synaptic activity on the induction of long-term potentiation. , 1992, Science.

[21]  Robert Chen,et al.  Interactions between two different inhibitory systems in the human motor cortex , 2001, The Journal of physiology.

[22]  E. Klann,et al.  Modulation of protein kinases and protein phosphatases by reactive oxygen species: Implications for hippocampal synaptic plasticity , 1999, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry.

[23]  M. Repacholi,et al.  Health risks from the use of mobile phones. , 2001, Toxicology letters.

[24]  Mark Hallett,et al.  Mechanisms of Deafferentation-Induced Plasticity in Human Motor Cortex , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  Didier Cros,et al.  Physiological motor asymmetry in human handedness: evidence from transcranial magnetic stimulation , 1994, Brain Research.

[26]  S. Spencer.  Neural Networks in Human Epilepsy: Evidence of and Implications for Treatment , 2002, Epilepsia.

[27]  C. Marsden,et al.  Corticocortical inhibition in human motor cortex. , 1993, The Journal of physiology.

[28]  Giuseppe Curcio,et al.  Neurophysiological effects of mobile phone electromagnetic fields on humans: A comprehensive review , 2007 .

[29]  G. Curcio,et al.  Is the brain influenced by a phone call? An EEG study of resting wakefulness , 2005, Neuroscience Research.

[30]  F. M. Ali,et al.  Effects of acute exposure to the radiofrequency fields of cellular phones on plasma lipid peroxide and antioxidase activities in human erythrocytes. , 2001, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[31]  Mark Newton,et al.  Changes in cortical excitability differentiate generalized and focal epilepsy , 2007, Annals of neurology.

[32]  N. Kuster,et al.  Electromagnetic fields, such as those from mobile phones, alter regional cerebral blood flow and sleep and waking EEG , 2002, Journal of sleep research.

[33]  S. Nelson,et al.  Homeostatic plasticity in the developing nervous system , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[34]  M. Ridding,et al.  Induction of plasticity in the dominant and non-dominant motor cortices of humans , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[35]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Preconditioning of Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Evidence for Homeostatic Plasticity in the Human Motor Cortex , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  Robert Chen,et al.  The effects of inhibitory and facilitatory intracortical circuits on interhemispheric inhibition in the human motor cortex , 2007, The Journal of physiology.

[37]  D. McCormick,et al.  On the cellular and network bases of epileptic seizures. , 2001, Annual review of physiology.

[38]  M. Rice,et al.  NMDA receptor activation mediates hydrogen peroxide-induced pathophysiology in rat hippocampal slices. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[39]  M G Marciani,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals an interhemispheric asymmetry of cortical inhibition in focal epilepsy , 2000, Neuroreport.

[40]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.