Strategic differences in algebraic problem solving: Neuroanatomical correlates

In this study, we built on previous neuroimaging studies of mathematical cognition and examined whether the same cognitive processes are engaged by two strategies used in algebraic problem solving. We focused on symbolic algebra, which uses alphanumeric equations to represent problems, and the model method, which uses pictorial representation. Eighteen adults, matched on academic proficiency and competency in the two methods, transformed algebraic word problems into equations or models, and validated presented solutions. Both strategies were associated with activation of areas linked to working memory and quantitative processing. These included the left frontal gyri, and bilateral activation of the intraparietal sulci. Contrasting the two strategies, the symbolic method activated the posterior superior parietal lobules and the precuneus. These findings suggest that the two strategies are effected using similar processes but impose different attentional demands.

[1]  Jesper Andersson,et al.  Isolating the retrieval of imagined pictures during episodic memory: activation of the left precuneus and left prefrontal cortex , 2003, NeuroImage.

[2]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  A decade of research on word problem solving in Leuven: Theoretical, methodological, and practical outcomes , 1993 .

[3]  G. Orban,et al.  Parietal Representation of Symbolic and Nonsymbolic Magnitude , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  Jesper Andersson,et al.  Valid conjunction inference with the minimum statistic , 2005, NeuroImage.

[5]  Kathryn M. McMillan,et al.  N‐back working memory paradigm: A meta‐analysis of normative functional neuroimaging studies , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[6]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Behavioral equivalence, but not neural equivalence—neural evidence of alternative strategies in mathematical thinking , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[7]  A. Miyake,et al.  Models of Working Memory: Mechanisms of Active Maintenance and Executive Control , 1999 .

[8]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  The process of understanding mathematical problems. , 1996 .

[9]  P M Grasby,et al.  Brain systems for encoding and retrieval of auditory-verbal memory. An in vivo study in humans. , 1995, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[10]  J. R. Augustine.  Circuitry and functional aspects of the insular lobe in primates including humans , 1996, Brain Research Reviews.

[11]  Daniel G. Bobrow,et al.  Natural Language Input for a Computer Problem Solving System , 1964 .

[12]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  Semantic Information Processing , 1968 .

[13]  Diane J. Briars,et al.  An integrated model of skill in solving elementary word problems cognition and instruction , 1984 .

[14]  James M. Moser,et al.  Representation of Addition and Subtraction Word Problems. , 1988 .

[15]  Doris-Eva Bamiou,et al.  The insula (Island of Reil) and its role in auditory processing Literature review , 2003, Brain Research Reviews.

[16]  N. Cowan.  An embedded-processes model of working memory , 1999 .

[17]  John R. Anderson,et al.  An information-processing model of the BOLD response in symbol manipulation tasks , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[18]  A. Miyake,et al.  Models of Working Memory , 1997 .

[19]  W Kintsch,et al.  Understanding and solving word arithmetic problems. , 1985, Psychological review.

[20]  Robert J. Sternberg,et al.  The Nature of Mathematical Thinking , 1996 .

[21]  Kaye Stacey,et al.  Learning the Algebraic Method of Solving Problems , 1999 .

[22]  R. Shillcock,et al.  Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society , 1998 .

[23]  Philippe Pinel,et al.  Tuning Curves for Approximate Numerosity in the Human Intraparietal Sulcus , 2004, Neuron.

[24]  A. Lewis.  Training students to represent arithmetic word problems , 1989 .

[25]  Laure Zago,et al.  Distinguishing visuospatial working memory and complex mental calculation areas within the parietal lobes , 2002, Neuroscience Letters.

[26]  V Menon,et al.  Cerebral Cortex doi:10.1093/cercor/bhi055 Developmental Changes in Mental Arithmetic: Evidence for Increased Functional Specialization in the Left Inferior Parietal Cortex , 2005 .

[27]  A. Kleinschmidt,et al.  A Supramodal Number Representation in Human Intraparietal Cortex , 2003, Neuron.

[28]  Kerry Lee,et al.  Model Method: Obstacle or Bridge to Learning Symbolic Algebra , 2006 .

[29]  Vinod Menon,et al.  Prefrontal cortex involvement in processing incorrect arithmetic equations: Evidence from event‐related fMRI , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[30]  Kerry Lee,et al.  Working memory and literacy as predictors of performance on algebraic word problems. , 2004, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[31]  Kenneth R. Koedinger,et al.  An fMRI Study of the Interplay of Symbolic and Visuo-Spatial Systems in Mathematical Reasoning , 2004 .

[32]  James G. Greeno,et al.  Developmental analysis of understanding language about quantities and of solving problems. , 1988 .

[33]  Carolyn Kieran.  Algebraic Thinking in the Early Grades: What Is It? , 2004 .

[34]  M. Behrmann,et al.  Parietal cortex and attention , 2004, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[35]  R. Mayer.  Thinking, Problem Solving, Cognition , 1983 .

[36]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Working Memory: The multiple-component model , 1999 .

[37]  S. Dehaene,et al.  THREE PARIETAL CIRCUITS FOR NUMBER PROCESSING , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[38]  Michael W. L. Chee,et al.  Neural correlates of symbolic and non-symbolic arithmetic , 2005, Neuropsychologia.