Group size, density and social dynamics in farm animals

Abstract Farm animals are social species with a strong tendency to form groups. Living in groups has associated costs and benefits. The costs refer mostly to competition for food, or access to other valuable resources that may lower the individuals’ fitness, while the benefits includes (but are not limited to) lower predation risk and increased available time to forage. Variation in the size of a group in natural populations is self-regulated through cost–benefits balance and can be considered a byproduct of the environmental conditions, as animals will join or leave the group depending on the overall benefits. This possibility does not exist in the farm environment, as animals will have no opportunities to leave a “costly” group setting, creating a situation of increased aggressive interactions that may favor despotic behaviour, with negative consequences for some individuals in the group. However, recent studies suggest that social behaviour of farm animals is not restricted to hierarchy formation and it is much more plastic and dynamic than previously thought. This behavioural plasticity allows animals to change strategies and adapt more easily to varying environmental (social and physical) conditions within a confined group. In this paper, we discuss three recently developed theoretical models that show how changes in social strategies are related to variations in group size. We argue that these models are built on different assumptions and explain how this leads to different predictions.

[1]  E. Russek-Cohen,et al.  Effects of crowding and access to perches on aggressive behaviour in broilers , 2002 .

[2]  R. C. Newberry,et al.  Group size and perching behaviour in young domestic fowl. , 2001, Applied animal behaviour science.

[3]  I. Estevez,et al.  Influence of vertical panels on use of space by domestic fowl. , 2001, Applied animal behaviour science.

[4]  J. L. Albright,et al.  Social rank and physiological traits of dairy cows as influenced by changing group membership. , 1976, Journal of dairy science.

[5]  M. Richard,et al.  Human-mare relationships and behaviour of foals toward humans , 2005 .

[6]  S. Sato,et al.  Social licking patterns in cattle (Bos taurus): influence of environmental and social factors , 1991 .

[7]  D. Ruzzante,et al.  RAPID BEHAVIORAL CHANGES IN MEDAKA (ORYZIAS LATIPES) CAUSED BY SELECTION FOR COMPETITIVE AND NONCOMPETITIVE GROWTH , 1991, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[8]  K. Bøe,et al.  Resting behaviour and displacements in ewes—effects of reduced lying space and pen shape , 2006 .

[9]  R. Underwood.  Vigilance Behaviour in Grazing African Antelopes , 1982 .

[10]  N. Metcalfe,et al.  Group foraging in wild brown hares: effects of resource distribution and social status , 1985, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  M. Bekoff,et al.  Animal play : evolutionary, comparative, and ecological perspectives , 1998 .

[12]  M. Mendl,et al.  Feeding pigs in troughs: a preliminary study of the distribution of individuals around depleting resources , 1996 .

[13]  G. McBride,et al.  Territorial Behaviour in Flocks of Domestic Fowls , 1962, Nature.

[14]  I. Duncan,et al.  External factors and causation of dustbathing in domestic hens , 1998, Behavioural Processes.

[15]  J. Rushen.  Development of social behaviour in chickens: A factor analysis , 1982, Behavioural Processes.

[16]  R. J. Turner,et al.  Choices of laboratory rabbits for individual or group-housing , 1995 .

[17]  H. Pulliam,et al.  On the advantages of flocking. , 1973, Journal of theoretical biology.

[18]  R. C. Newberry,et al.  Decreasing aggression with increasing group size in young domestic fowl , 2003 .

[19]  Carolyn L. Hall,et al.  Spatial benefits afforded by high rank in white-faced capuchins , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[20]  L. G. Lawson,et al.  Influence of Stocking Density on Tonic Immobility, Lameness, and Tibial Dyschondroplasia in Broilers , 2001 .

[21]  M. Elgar,et al.  PREDATOR VIGILANCE AND GROUP SIZE IN MAMMALS AND BIRDS: A CRITICAL REVIEW OF THE EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE , 1989, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[22]  C. Hemelrijk.  An individual–orientated model of the emergence of despotic and egalitarian societies , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  C. Nicol,et al.  Space and density effects on group size preferences in laying hens. , 1996, British poultry science.

[24]  T. Caraco,et al.  Living in groups: is there an optimal group size? , 1984 .

[25]  M. Crowe,et al.  Growth, behaviour, adrenal and immune responses of finishing beef heifers housed on slatted floors at 1.5, 2.0, 2.5 or 3.0 m2 space allowance , 1997 .

[26]  P. N. Grigor,et al.  Low incidence of aggression in large flocks of laying hens , 1997 .

[27]  Katerina V. Thompson,et al.  Animal Play: Self assessment in juvenile play , 1998 .

[28]  E. Price,et al.  Behavioral responses to short-term social isolation in sheep and goats , 1980 .

[29]  R. C. Newberry,et al.  Broiler chickens: a tolerant social system? , 1997 .

[30]  R. C. Newberry,et al.  Playful behaviour of piglets , 1988, Behavioural Processes.

[31]  L. Keeling,et al.  Social Behaviour in Farm Animals , 2001 .

[32]  B. Wechsler,et al.  The synchronization of nursing bouts in group-housed sows , 1996 .

[33]  Bakken,et al.  The effects of weight asymmetry and resource distribution on aggression in groups of unacquainted pigs. , 2000, Applied animal behaviour science.

[34]  M. Bakken,et al.  The significance of theories in behavioural ecology for solving problems in applied ethology—Possibilities and limitations § , 2006 .

[35]  Harold W. Gonyou,et al.  Effects of group size on social behavior following regrouping of growing–finishing pigs , 2004 .

[36]  R. J. Orr,et al.  The effects of group size on grazing time in sheep , 1993 .

[37]  M. Pagel,et al.  Peck orders and group size in laying hens: `futures contracts' for non-aggression , 1997, Behavioural Processes.

[38]  W. Hamilton.  Geometry for the selfish herd. , 1971, Journal of theoretical biology.

[39]  F. Carpenter,et al.  Food abundance and territoriality: to defend or not to defend? , 1987 .

[40]  J. Krebs,et al.  Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach , 1978 .

[41]  C. Hemelrijk.  Self-Organization and Natural Selection in the Evolution of Complex Despotic Societies , 2002, The Biological Bulletin.

[42]  G. Parker,et al.  Competition for resources , 1991 .

[43]  C. Donnelly,et al.  Chicken welfare is influenced more by housing conditions than by stocking density , 2004, Nature.

[44]  Charlotte K. Hemelrijk,et al.  Towards the integration of social dominance and spatial structure , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[45]  R. C. Newberry,et al.  RECENT SOCIAL EXPERIENCE, BODY WEIGHT AND INITIAL PATTERNS OF ATTACK PREDICT THE SOCIAL STATUS ATTAINED BY UNFAMILIAR HENS IN A NEW GROUP , 2000 .

[46]  N. Anthony,et al.  Responses to social disruption in two lines of white leghorn chickens , 1988 .

[47]  J. Hurnik,et al.  Locomotion of broiler chickens in floor pens. , 1990, Poultry Science.

[48]  L. Leaver,et al.  Grazing and vigilance by Soay sheep on Lundy island: Influence of group size, terrain and the distribution of vegetation , 2005, Behavioural Processes.

[49]  Yoshimasa Shimizu,et al.  Relationship between Social Grooming and Agonistic Behaviour in a Stable Fattening Cattle Herd , 1993 .

[50]  C. Phillips,et al.  The effects of forage provision and group size on the behavior of calves. , 2004, Journal of dairy science.

[51]  E. Kanitz,et al.  Effects of social status after mixing on immune, metabolic, and endocrine responses in pigs , 1998, Physiology & Behavior.

[52]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Mathematical model of self-organizing hierarchies in animal societies , 1996 .

[53]  M. Mendl,et al.  Physiological and reproductive correlates of behavioural strategies in female domestic pigs , 1992, Animal Behaviour.

[54]  R. C. Newberry,et al.  Production-related traits of layers reared in different sized flocks: the concept of problematic intermediate group sizes. , 2003, Poultry science.

[55]  Williams,et al.  Review Of "The Behavioural Biology Of Aggression" By J. Archer , 1989 .

[56]  L. Keeling,et al.  How important is social facilitation for dustbathing in laying hens , 2002 .

[57]  J. A. Fregonesi,et al.  Influence of space allowance and milk yield level on behaviour, performance and health of dairy cows housed in strawyard and cubicle systems , 2002 .

[58]  F. Provenza,et al.  Social influences on conditioned food aversions in sheep , 1990 .

[59]  K. E. Bøe,et al.  Aggression and group size in domesticated pigs, Sus scrofa: ‘when the winner takes it all and the loser is standing small’ , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[60]  G. Roberts.  Why individual vigilance declines as group size increases , 1996, Animal Behaviour.

[61]  R. C. Newberry,et al.  Use of pen space by broiler chickens: effects of age and pen size. , 1990 .

[62]  K. Bøe,et al.  The influence of different feeding arrangements and food type on competition at feeding in pregnant sows , 1999 .

[63]  D. Ruzzante,et al.  EVOLUTION OF SOCIAL BEHAVIOR IN A RESOURCE‐RICH, STRUCTURED ENVIRONMENT: SELECTION EXPERIMENTS WITH MEDAKA (ORYZIAS LATIPES) , 1993, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[64]  Sandra A. Edwards,et al.  Effect of social group size on aggressive behaviour between unacquainted domestic pigs , 2001 .

[65]  M. Bakken.  Reproduction in farmed Silver fox vixens, Vulpes vulpes, in relation to own competition capacity and that of neighbouring vixens. , 1993, Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie.

[66]  W. C. Allee,et al.  Some Relations between Flock Size and Agonistic Behavior in Domestic Hens , 1957, Physiological Zoology.

[67]  A. Boissy,et al.  Effects of repeated stress during pregnancy in ewes on the behavioural and physiological responses to stressful events and birth weight of their offspring , 2004 .

[68]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Back to the basics of anti-predatory vigilance: the group-size effect , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[69]  Paulien Hogeweg,et al.  Mirror Beyond Mirror: Puddles of Life , 1987, ALIFE.

[70]  M. Mendl,et al.  Living in groups: an evolutionary perspective , 2001 .

[71]  L. Jeppesen,et al.  Calves’ motivation for access to two different types of social contact measured by operant conditioning , 2002 .

[72]  Luc-Alain Giraldeau,et al.  Producer–Scrounger Games in a Spatially Explicit World: Tactic Use Influences Flock Geometry of Spice Finches , 2001 .

[73]  I. Estevez,et al.  Effects of density on perching behavior of broiler chickens. , 2001, Applied animal behaviour science.

[74]  M. Childress,et al.  Predation risk, gender and the group size effect: does elk vigilance depend upon the behaviour of conspecifics? , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[75]  J. Koolhaas,et al.  Long-term effects of social stress on antiviral immunity in pigs , 2001, Physiology & Behavior.

[76]  E. Russek-Cohen,et al.  Effects of density and perch availability on the immune status of broilers. , 2002, Poultry science.

[77]  A. J. Rook,et al.  Synchronisation of eating, ruminating and idling activity by grazing sheep , 1991 .

[78]  B. M. Freeman,et al.  Aspects of poultry behaviour , 1970 .

[79]  G. A. Parker,et al.  Ideal free distributions when individuals differ in competitive ability: phenotype-limited ideal free models , 1986, Animal Behaviour.

[80]  Erkens,et al.  Behavioural and physiological consequences of acute social defeat in growing gilts: effects of the social environment. , 2001, Applied animal behaviour science.

[81]  L. Wilkins,et al.  Differential effects of increased stocking density, mediated by increased flock size, on feather pecking and aggression in laying hens , 1999 .

[82]  Guy Beauchamp,et al.  Group-size effects on vigilance: a search for mechanisms , 2003, Behavioural Processes.

[83]  Mike Mesterton-Gibbons,et al.  Toward a theory of dominance hierarchies: effects of assessment, group size, and variation in fighting ability , 1995 .

[84]  J J McGlone,et al.  A quantitative ethogram of aggressive and submissive behaviors in recently regrouped pigs. , 1985, Journal of animal science.

[85]  E. Petersson,et al.  Agonistic behavior and growth in newly emerged brown trout (Salmo trutta L) of sea‐ranched and wild origin , 2002 .

[86]  J. Craig,et al.  Effect of Crowding and Cage Shape on Productivity and Profitability of Caged Layers: A Survey , 1985 .

[87]  D. McCullough,et al.  Evolution of Alarm Signals in Ungulates with Special Reference to White-Tailed Deer , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[88]  R. C. Newberry,et al.  Dynamics of aggression in the domestic fowl , 2002 .

[89]  Howery,et al.  Effects of social facilitation for locating feeding sites by cattle in an eight-arm radial maze. , 2000, Applied animal behaviour science.

[90]  L. Giraldeau,et al.  Geometry for a selfish foraging group: a genetic algorithm approach , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[91]  W. Roush,et al.  Broiler production under varying population densities. , 1992, Poultry science.

[92]  M. Bakken.  The relationship between competition capacity and reproduction in farmed silver-fox vixens, Vulpes vulpes. , 1993, Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie.

[93]  H. B. Simonsen,et al.  Effect of Floor Type and Density on the Integument of Egg-Layers , 1980 .

[94]  Garel,et al.  The social environment influences the behavioural responses of beef cattle to handling. , 2000, Applied animal behaviour science.

[95]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Dominance orders in animal societies: The self-organization hypothesis revisited , 1999, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[96]  A. Guhl,et al.  Social behavior of the domestic fowl. , 1968, Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science. Kansas Academy of Science.

[97]  P. N. Grigor,et al.  Social inhibition of movement in domestic hens , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[98]  O. Adeyemo,et al.  Social behaviour and adrenal cortical activity in heifers , 1982 .

[99]  M. Bryant,et al.  Resource defence, monopolization and variation of fitness in groups of female Japanese medaka depend on the synchrony of food arrival , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[100]  C. Channing,et al.  Spatial distribution and behaviour of laying hens housed in an alternative system. , 2001, Applied animal behaviour science.

[101]  Janice C. Daniel,et al.  An experimental study of behavioural group size effects in tammar wallabies, Macropus eugenii , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[102]  M. Christman,et al.  Environmental complexity and group size: Immediate effects on use of space by domestic fowl , 2007 .

[103]  D. Wood‐Gush,et al.  Social facilitation in the feeding behaviour of pigs and the effect of rank , 1984 .

[104]  B. O. Hughes,et al.  Laying hens in large flocks in a perchery system: influence of stocking density on location, use of resources and behaviour. , 1999, British poultry science.

[105]  W. Muir,et al.  Social stress in laying hens: differential effect of stress on plasma dopamine concentrations and adrenal function in genetically selected chickens. , 2003, Poultry science.

[106]  W. C. Allee,et al.  Some Measurable Effects of Social Organization in Flocks of Hens , 1944, Physiological Zoology.

[107]  Behavioural and physiolgical thermoregulation in groups of pregnant sows housed in a kennel system at low temperatures , 2000 .

[108]  A. Nishiwaki,et al.  The effects of social exchange between two groups of lactating primiparous heifers on milk production, dominance order, behavior and adrenocortical response , 1997 .

[109]  Bakken,et al.  Variation in behavioural responses of ewes towards predator-related stimuli. , 2001, Applied animal behaviour science.

[110]  C. K. Hemelrijk,et al.  Individual variation by self-organisation , 2005, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[111]  H W Gonyou,et al.  The effects of regrouping on behavioral and production parameters in finishing swine. , 1994, Journal of Animal Science.

[112]  J. Craig,et al.  Agonistic behavior of caged chickens related to group size and area per bird , 1975 .

[113]  S. Edwards,et al.  The effect of space allowance on performance, aggression and immune competence of growing pigs housed on straw deep-litter at different group sizes , 2000 .

[114]  B. Forkman,et al.  The Maintenance of Stable Dominance Hierarchies and the Pattern of Aggression: Support for the Suppression Hypothesis , 2004 .

[115]  M. Sullivan.  Flock structure in red junglefowl , 1991 .

[116]  T. Tear,et al.  Social system development and variability in a reintroduced Arabian oryx population , 1999 .

[117]  Colin T. Whittemore,et al.  Effect of group size on feeding behaviour, social behaviour, and performance of growing pigs using single-space feeders , 1995 .

[118]  R. R. Krausz.  Living in Groups , 2013 .

[119]  J. Magnuson,et al.  An analysis of aggressive behavior, growth, and competition for food and space in medaka (Oryzias latipes) : pisces, cyprinodontidae , 1962 .

[120]  D M Weary,et al.  Effect of feeding space on the inter-cow distance, aggression, and feeding behavior of free-stall housed lactating dairy cows. , 2004, Journal of dairy science.

[121]  L. Dugatkin,et al.  Group fusion: the impact of winner, loser, and bystander effects on hierarchy formation in large groups , 2003 .

[122]  D. Kramer,et al.  The effect of group size on space use and aggression at a concentrated food source in blue gouramis, Trichogaster trichopterus (Pisces: Belontiidae) , 1996, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[123]  S. Edwards,et al.  Behaviour, social interactions and lesion scores of group-housed sows in relation to floor space allowance , 1998 .

[124]  M. Kavaliers,et al.  Learning to fear and cope with a natural stressor: individually and socially acquired corticosterone and avoidance responses to biting flies , 2003, Hormones and Behavior.

[125]  Donald A. Dewsbury.  Behavioral Ecology: Ecological Consequences of Adaptive Behavior. , 1986 .

[126]  H. Dove,et al.  Dominance patterns and positional behaviour of sheep in yards , 1974 .

[127]  L. Douglass,et al.  Using artificial cover to reduce aggression and disturbances in domestic fowl , 2002 .