Electrophysiological channel interactions using focused multipolar stimulation for cochlear implants

OBJECTIVE Speech intelligibility with existing multichannel cochlear implants (CIs) is thought to be limited by poor spatial selectivity and interactions between CI channels caused by overlapping activation with monopolar (MP) stimulation. Our previous studies have shown that focused multipolar (FMP) and tripolar (TP) stimulation produce more restricted neural activation in the inferior colliculus (IC), compared to MP stimulation. APPROACH This study explored interactions in the IC produced by simultaneous stimulation of two CI channels. We recorded multi-unit neural activity in the IC of anaesthetized cats with normal and severely degenerated spiral ganglion neuron populations in response to FMP, TP and MP stimulation from a 14 channel CI. Stimuli were applied to a 'fixed' CI channel, chosen toward the middle of the cochlear electrode array, and the effects of simultaneously stimulating a more apical 'test' CI channel were measured as a function of spatial separation between the two stimulation channels and stimulus level of the fixed channel. Channel interactions were quantified by changes in neural responses and IC threshold (i.e., threshold shift) elicited by simultaneous stimulation of two CI channels, compared to stimulation of the test channel alone. MAIN RESULTS Channel interactions were significantly lower for FMP and TP than for MP stimulation (p < 0.001), whereas no significant difference was observed between FMP and TP stimulation. With MP stimulation, threshold shifts increased with decreased inter-electrode spacing and increased stimulus levels of the fixed channel. For FMP and TP stimulation, channel interactions were found to be similar for different inter-electrode spacing and stimulus levels of the fixed channel. SIGNIFICANCE The present study demonstrates how the degree of channel interactions in a CI can be controlled using stimulation configurations such as FMP and TP; such knowledge is essential in enhancing CI function in complex acoustic environments.

[1]  H J McDermott,et al.  Loudness summation for pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea: effects of rate, electrode separation, level, and mode of stimulation. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  B. Moore.  Psychophysical tuning curves measured in simultaneous and forward masking. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  John C Middlebrooks,et al.  Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: dependence on electrode configuration. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  R. Galamboš.  INHIBITION OF ACTIVITY IN SINGLE AUDITORY NERVE FIBERS BY ACOUSTIC STIMULATION , 1944 .

[5]  Robert K Shepherd,et al.  Sensorineural hearing loss during development: morphological and physiological response of the cochlea and auditory brainstem , 1999, Hearing Research.

[6]  Julie Arenberg Bierer,et al.  Partial tripolar cochlear implant stimulation: Spread of excitation and forward masking in the inferior colliculus , 2010, Hearing Research.

[7]  Philipos C. Loizou,et al.  Effects of electrode design and configuration on channel interactions , 2006, Hearing Research.

[8]  R. Shannon,et al.  Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  A. Wise,et al.  Chronic neurotrophin delivery promotes ectopic neurite growth from the spiral ganglion of deafened cochleae without compromising the spatial selectivity of cochlear implants , 2013, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[10]  P J Blamey,et al.  Psychophysical studies for two multiple-channel cochlear implant patients. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Stephen J. Rebscher,et al.  The effect of electrode configuration and duration of deafness on threshold and selectivity of responses to intracochlear electrical stimulation. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Marco Pelizzone,et al.  Channel interactions in patients using the Ineraid multichannel cochlear implant , 1993, Hearing Research.

[13]  John C. Middlebrooks,et al.  Topographic Spread of Inferior Colliculus Activation in Response to Acoustic and Intracochlear Electric Stimulation , 2004, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[14]  James B. Fallon,et al.  A novel stimulus artifact removal technique for high-rate electrical stimulation , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[15]  D. D. Greenwood.  A cochlear frequency-position function for several species--29 years later. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  P. Stypulkowski,et al.  Single fiber mapping of spatial excitation patterns in the electrically stimulated auditory nerve , 1987, Hearing Research.

[17]  C. Jolly,et al.  Quadrupolar stimulation for cochlear prostheses: modeling and experimental data , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  M M Merzenich,et al.  Multichannel cochlear implants. Channel interactions and processor design. , 1984, Archives of otolaryngology.

[19]  Monica Padilla,et al.  Loudness summation using focused and unfocused electrical stimulation. , 2014, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  Michael B. Calford,et al.  Monaural inhibition in cat auditory cortex. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  Julie Arenberg Bierer,et al.  Cortical Responses to Cochlear Implant Stimulation: Channel Interactions , 2004, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[22]  F B Simmons,et al.  Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. , 1966, Archives of otolaryngology.

[23]  David M. Landsberger,et al.  Virtual channel discrimination is improved by current focusing in cochlear implant recipients , 2009, Hearing Research.

[24]  Jong Ho Won,et al.  Relationship between channel interaction and spectral-ripple discrimination in cochlear implant users. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  Julie Arenberg Bierer,et al.  Threshold and channel interaction in cochlear implant users: evaluation of the tripolar electrode configuration. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  Robert V. Shannon,et al.  Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. II. Channel interaction , 1983, Hearing Research.

[27]  Deniz Başkent,et al.  Speech recognition in normal hearing and sensorineural hearing loss as a function of the number of spectral channels. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  Fan-Gang Zeng,et al.  Spatial channel interactions in cochlear implants , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[29]  Maike Vollmer,et al.  Plasticity in central representations in the inferior colliculus induced by chronic single- vs. two-channel electrical stimulation by a cochlear implant after neonatal deafness , 2000, Hearing Research.

[30]  Christopher J. Long,et al.  Multipolar current focusing increases spectral resolution in cochlear implants , 2013, 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[31]  Monica Padilla,et al.  Improving speech perception in noise with current focusing in cochlear implant users , 2013, Hearing Research.

[32]  J J Hanekom,et al.  Gap detection as a measure of electrode interaction in cochlear implants. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  Luke Campbell,et al.  Evaluation of focused multipolar stimulation for cochlear implants in long-term deafened cats , 2015, Journal of neural engineering.

[34]  Günter Ehret,et al.  Complex sound analysis (frequency resolution, filtering and spectral integration) by single units of the inferior colliculus of the cat , 1988, Brain Research Reviews.

[35]  Li Xu,et al.  Effects of Electrode Configuration and Place of Stimulation on Speech Perception with Cochlear Prostheses , 2000, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[36]  Jeroen J Briaire,et al.  Spread of Excitation and Channel Interaction in Single- and Dual-Electrode Cochlear Implant Stimulation , 2012, Ear and hearing.

[37]  Marco Pelizzone,et al.  Acoustic to Electric Pitch Comparisons in Cochlear Implant Subjects with Residual Hearing , 2006, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[38]  Xiaoqin Wang,et al.  Spectral integration in A1 of awake primates: neurons with single- and multipeaked tuning characteristics. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[39]  Hugh J. McDermott,et al.  Pitch ranking of complex tones by normally hearing subjects and cochlear implant users , 2007, Hearing Research.

[40]  R. Snyder,et al.  Monopolar Intracochlear Pulse Trains Selectively Activate the Inferior Colliculus , 2012, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[41]  Marco Pelizzone,et al.  Electrical field interactions in different cochlear implant systems. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[42]  J K Shallop,et al.  Evaluation of a new spectral peak coding strategy for the Nucleus 22 Channel Cochlear Implant System. , 1994, The American journal of otology.

[43]  Chris van den Honert,et al.  Focused intracochlear electric stimulation with phased array channels. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[44]  Qian-Jie Fu,et al.  Noise Susceptibility of Cochlear Implant Users: The Role of Spectral Resolution and Smearing , 2005, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[45]  A. Wise,et al.  An improved cochlear implant electrode array for use in experimental studies , 2011, Hearing Research.

[46]  M. Pelizzone,et al.  Channel interactions with high-rate biphasic electrical stimulation in cochlear implant subjects , 2003, Hearing Research.

[47]  S A Telian,et al.  Patient performance with the Cochlear Corporation "20 + 2" implant: bipolar versus monopolar activation. , 1996, The American journal of otology.

[48]  M. J. Osberger,et al.  Comparison of Continuous Interleaved Sampling and Simultaneous Analog Stimulation Speech Processing Strategies in Newly Implanted Adults with a Clarion 1.2 Cochlear Implant , 2005, Otology and Neurotology.

[49]  Hugh J. McDermott,et al.  Perceptual Interactions Between Electrodes Using Focused and Monopolar Cochlear Stimulation , 2015, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[50]  D. Irvine,et al.  Cochlear implant use following neonatal deafness influences the cochleotopic organization of the primary auditory cortex in cats , 2009, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[51]  R. Snyder,et al.  Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation in the neonatally deafened cat. I: Expansion of central representation , 1990, Hearing Research.

[52]  A. Wise,et al.  Evaluation of focused multipolar stimulation for cochlear implants in acutely deafened cats , 2014, Journal of neural engineering.