Analysis of uterine contractions: a dynamical approach

The development of suitable techniques for quantifying mechanical and electrophysiological aspects of uterine contractions has been an active area of research. The uterus is a physiological system consisting of a large number of interacting muscle cells. The activity of these cells evolves with time, a trait characteristic of a dynamical system. While such complex physiological systems are non-linear by their very nature, whether this non-linearity is exhibited in the external recording is far from trivial. Traditional techniques such as spectral analysis have been used in the past, but these techniques implicitly assume that the process generating the contractions is linear and hence may be biased. In this tutorial review, a systematic approach using a hierarchy of surrogate algorithms is used to determine the nature of the process generating the contractions produced during labor. The results reveal that uterine contractions are probably generated by non-linear processes. The contraction segments were obtained through simultaneous recordings of the electrical and magnetic signals corresponding to the electrophysiological activity of the uterus and then analyzed. The electrical activity was recorded by placement of non-invasive electrodes onto the maternal abdomen and magnetic activity was recorded non-invasively using a superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID).

[1]  James Theiler,et al.  Testing for nonlinearity in time series: the method of surrogate data , 1992 .

[2]  Shu Chien,et al.  Handbook of Bioengineering , 1986 .

[3]  S M Pincus,et al.  Approximate entropy as a measure of system complexity. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Schreiber,et al.  Improved Surrogate Data for Nonlinearity Tests. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[5]  S. Narumiya,et al.  Failure of parturition in mice lacking the prostaglandin F receptor. , 1997, Science.

[6]  B. Sanborn Hormones and Calcium: Mechanisms Controlling Uterine Smooth Muscle Contractile Activity , 2001, Experimental physiology.

[7]  N. Hingorani,et al.  HIGH-POWER ELECTRONICS , 1993 .

[8]  Holger Kantz,et al.  Practical implementation of nonlinear time series methods: The TISEAN package. , 1998, Chaos.

[9]  G. Wolfs,et al.  Electrical and mechanical activity of the human uterus during labour , 1970, Archiv für Gynäkologie.

[10]  C Marque,et al.  Uterine electromyography: a critical review. , 1993, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[11]  C. Pauerstein,et al.  Pattern and Duration of Ovum Transport in the Baboon (Papio anubis) , 1976, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[12]  G. Saade,et al.  Control and assessment of the uterus and cervix during pregnancy and labour. , 1998, Human reproduction update.

[13]  M L Barclay,et al.  A Computer Model of Uterine Contractions Based on Discrete Contractile Elements , 1995, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[14]  G. Dunselman,et al.  Relation between endometrial wavelike activity and fecundability in spontaneous cycles. , 1997, Fertility and sterility.

[15]  R. Garfield,et al.  Appearance of gap junctions in the myometrium of women during labor. , 1981, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[16]  S. Miller,et al.  Control of myometrial contractility: role and regulation of gap junctions. , 1988, Oxford reviews of reproductive biology.

[17]  Hubert Preissl,et al.  First magnetomyographic recordings of uterine activity with spatial-temporal information with a 151-channel sensor array. , 2002, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[18]  Hari Eswaran,et al.  Testing for nonlinearity of the Contraction Segments in Uterine Electromyography , 2000, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos.

[19]  D. T. Kaplan,et al.  Fetal ECG extraction with nonlinear state-space projections , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  Hans H. Zingg,et al.  Inhibition of oxytocin receptor function by direct binding of progesterone , 1998, Nature.

[21]  T. Tenforde Biomagnetism: An interdisciplinary approach , 1986, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[22]  Werner Lutzenberger,et al.  Fractal dimension of electroencephalographic time series and underlying brain processes , 1995, Biological Cybernetics.

[23]  G J HERTSCH,et al.  Electrical activity of the human uterus in labor; the electrohysterograph. , 1950, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[24]  K. Dodge,et al.  G protein signalling pathways in myometrium: affecting the balance between contraction and relaxation. , 1998, Reviews of reproduction.

[25]  R. Garfield,et al.  Electrical Activity of the Human Uterus During Pregnancy as Recorded from the Abdominal Surface , 1997, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[26]  A. Arkin,et al.  It's a noisy business! Genetic regulation at the nanomolar scale. , 1999, Trends in genetics : TIG.