Altruism costs(cid:2)the cheap signal from amygdala

When people state their willingness to pay for something, the amount usually differs from the behavior in a real purchase situation. The discrepancy between a hypothetical answer and the real act is called hypothetical bias. We investigated neural processes of hypothetical bias regarding monetary donations to public goods using fMRI with the hypothesis that amygdala codes for real costs. Real decisions activated amygdala more than hypothetical decisions. This was observed for both accepted and rejected proposals. The more the subjects accepted real donation proposals the greater was the activity in rostral anterior cingulate cortex(cid:2)a region known to control amygdala but also neural processing of the cost-benefit difference. The presen- tation of a charitable donation goal evoked an insula activity that predicted the later decision to donate. In conclusion, we have identified the neural mechanisms underlying real donation behavior, compatible with theories on hypothetical bias. Our findings imply that the emotional system has an important role in real decision making as it signals what kind of immediate cost and reward an outcome is associated with.

[1]  Russell Thompson,et al.  Differential neural circuitry and self-interest in real vs hypothetical moral decisions , 2012, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[2]  G. Pezzulo,et al.  The Value of Foresight: How Prospection Affects Decision-Making , 2011, Front. Neurosci..

[3]  Peter Fransson,et al.  Limbic Justice—Amygdala Involvement in Immediate Rejection in the Ultimatum Game , 2011, PLoS biology.

[4]  Mkael Symmonds,et al.  Neural Segregation of Objective and Contextual Aspects of Fairness , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  Shu Li,et al.  Can Sophie's Choice Be Adequately Captured by Cold Computation of Minimizing Losses? An fMRI Study of Vital Loss Decisions , 2011, PloS one.

[6]  D. Tranel,et al.  The amygdala and decision-making , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  Antonio Rangel,et al.  Hypothetical and Real Choice Differentially Activate Common Valuation Areas , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  R. Jenison,et al.  Value Encoding in Single Neurons in the Human Amygdala during Decision Making , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  C. Fiebach,et al.  How the brain integrates costs and benefits during decision making , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  K. Preuschoff,et al.  Neural Responses to Ingroup and Outgroup Members' Suffering Predict Individual Differences in Costly Helping , 2010, Neuron.

[11]  P. Dayan,et al.  States versus Rewards: Dissociable Neural Prediction Error Signals Underlying Model-Based and Model-Free Reinforcement Learning , 2010, Neuron.

[12]  R. Dolan,et al.  Framing effect following bilateral amygdala lesion , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Amygdala damage eliminates monetary loss aversion , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Shinsuke Shimojo,et al.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex decreases valuations during food choices , 2009, The European journal of neuroscience.

[15]  K. Berridge,et al.  Towards a functional neuroanatomy of pleasure and happiness , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  D. Kumaran,et al.  A Genetically Mediated Bias in Decision Making Driven by Failure of Amygdala Control , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  Michael G. Hardin,et al.  Neural substrates of reward magnitude, probability, and risk during a wheel of fortune decision-making task , 2009, NeuroImage.

[18]  O. Johansson-Stenman,et al.  Measuring Hypothetical Bias in Choice Experiments: The Importance of Cognitive Consistency , 2008 .

[19]  J. Lusk,et al.  Is Hypothetical Bias a Universal Phenomenon? A Multinational Investigation , 2008, Land Economics.

[20]  G Elliott Wimmer,et al.  Nucleus accumbens activation mediates the influence of reward cues on financial risk taking , 2008, Neuroreport.

[21]  K. Berridge,et al.  Affective neuroscience of pleasure: reward in humans and animals , 2008, Psychopharmacology.

[22]  Fabian Grabenhorst,et al.  Role of the amygdala in decisions under ambiguity and decisions under risk: Evidence from patients with Urbach-Wiethe disease , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[23]  J. O'Doherty,et al.  Orbitofrontal Cortex Encodes Willingness to Pay in Everyday Economic Transactions , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  J. O'Doherty,et al.  Contributions of the Amygdala to Reward Expectancy and Choice Signals in Human Prefrontal Cortex , 2007, Neuron.

[25]  R. Dolan,et al.  Brain, emotion and decision making: the paradigmatic example of regret , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  O. Johansson-Stenman,et al.  Hypothetical bias in choice experiments: Within versus between subject tests , 2007 .

[27]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Neural Predictors of Purchases , 2007, Neuron.

[28]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Diminishing Reciprocal Fairness by Disrupting the Right Prefrontal Cortex , 2006, Science.

[29]  E. Kandel,et al.  Resolving Emotional Conflict: A Role for the Rostral Anterior Cingulate Cortex in Modulating Activity in the Amygdala , 2006, Neuron.

[30]  D. Kumaran,et al.  Frames, Biases, and Rational Decision-Making in the Human Brain , 2006, Science.

[31]  J. O'Doherty,et al.  Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others , 2006, Nature.

[32]  D. D. de Quervain,et al.  The Neural Basis of Altruistic Punishment , 2004, Science.

[33]  James K Rilling,et al.  The neural correlates of theory of mind within interpersonal interactions , 2004, NeuroImage.

[34]  Joseph A Maldjian,et al.  Precentral gyrus discrepancy in electronic versions of the Talairach atlas , 2004, NeuroImage.

[35]  James J. Murphy,et al.  A Meta-analysis of Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Valuation , 2003 .

[36]  Martin P Paulus,et al.  Ventromedial prefrontal cortex activation is critical for preference judgments , 2003, Neuroreport.

[37]  Paul J. Laurienti,et al.  An automated method for neuroanatomic and cytoarchitectonic atlas-based interrogation of fMRI data sets , 2003, NeuroImage.

[38]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The Neural Basis of Economic Decision-Making in the Ultimatum Game , 2003, Science.

[39]  A. Damasio,et al.  Role of the Amygdala in Decision‐Making , 2003, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[40]  R. Dolan,et al.  Effects of Attention and Emotion on Face Processing in the Human Brain An Event-Related fMRI Study , 2001, Neuron.

[41]  Peter Martinsson,et al.  Do Hypothetical and Actual Marginal Willingness to Pay Differ in Choice Experiments?: Application to the Valuation of the Environment , 2001 .

[42]  Laura O. Taylor,et al.  Do As You Say, Say As You Do: Evidence On Gender Differences In Actual And Stated Contributions To Public Goods , 2000 .

[43]  Per-Olov Johansson,et al.  An experimental comparison of dichotomous choice contingent valuation questions and real purchase decisions , 1998 .

[44]  Glenn W. Harrison,et al.  Statistical Bias Functions and Informative Hypothetical Surveys , 1994 .

[45]  J. Brown-Kruse,et al.  Gender effects in laboratory public goods contribution: Do individuals put their money where their mouth is? , 1993 .

[46]  G. Tremblay.  The Prefrontal Cortex , 1989, Neurology.

[47]  W. Güth,et al.  An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining , 1982 .

[48]  Fredrik Carlsson,et al.  Do you do what you say or do you do what you say others do , 2010 .

[49]  R. Hoskins,et al.  Neural Responses to Taxation and Voluntary Giving Reveal Motives for Charitable Donations , 2007 .

[50]  Michael Davis,et al.  The amygdala , 2000, Current Biology.

[51]  Thomas Baumgartner,et al.  Article the Neural Circuitry of a Broken Promise , 2022 .