Awareness, use, and impact of the 1984 Joint National Committee consensus report on high blood pressure.

A random sample of Maryland physicians stratified by practice specialty (family, general, internal medicine, cardiology, and nephrology) was surveyed before and one year after dissemination of the 1984 Report of the Third Joint National Committee on the Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (The JNC III Report). Fourty-four per cent of the total eligible sample responded to both questionnaires. One year after publication, 62 per cent of physicians participating in both parts of the study were aware of the report. Although availability of a copy (58 per cent), familiarity with the recommendations (81 per cent), and the extent to which care was based on the guidelines (65 per cent) were high, use of the report in practice (17 per cent) and the amount of change in practice behavior required to adhere to the guidelines (18 per cent) were low. Prior to publication of the report, more than two-thirds of responding physicians were found to be practicing in a manner congruent with nine of ten treatment recommendations studied. One year after JNC III's release, they reported practice behavior which was not significantly different. It seems that this consensus report codified, rather than changed, practice behavior in this sample.

[1]  I. Jacoby,et al.  Direct mailing as a means of disseminating NIH consensus statements. A comparison with current techniques. , 1986, JAMA.

[2]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social processes in physicians' adoption of a new drug. , 1959, Journal of chronic diseases.

[3]  G. Thomson,et al.  High blood pressure diagnosis and treatment: consensus recommendations vs actual practice. , 1981, American journal of public health.

[4]  H. Fineberg,et al.  Diffusion of innovations in burn care: selected findings. , 1983, Burns, including thermal injury.

[5]  R. Fletcher,et al.  The Application of Official Policy: Prophylaxis Recommendations for Patients With Mitral Valve Prolapse , 1985, Medical care.

[6]  M. Hill,et al.  Pap testing: opinion and practice among young obstetrician-gynecologists. , 1986, Preventive medicine.

[7]  S. Brooks,et al.  Survey of compliance with American Heart Association guidelines for prevention of bacterial endocarditis. , 1980, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[8]  D M Eddy,et al.  Clinical policies and the quality of clinical practice. , 1982, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  J. Cutler,et al.  The 1984 Report of the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. , 1984, Archives of internal medicine.

[10]  D. Kessner Diffusion of new medical information. , 1981, American journal of public health.

[11]  E F Cook,et al.  Screening procedures in the asymptomatic adult. Comparison of physicians' recommendations, patients' desires, published guidelines, and actual practice. , 1985, JAMA.

[12]  C. Kunzel,et al.  Clinician compliance and the prevention of bacterial endocarditis. , 1984, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[13]  S. Fletcher,et al.  The Periodic Health Examination: Comparison of Recommendations and Internists' Performance , 1981, Southern medical journal.

[14]  B. McNeil,et al.  The impact of early breast cancer randomized clinical trials on the practice of medicine , 1985 .

[15]  S. Perry,et al.  The NIH Consensus Development Program , 1987 .

[16]  B. Littenberg,et al.  Improving Physician Compliance With Preventive Medicine Guidelines , 1982, Medical care.

[17]  R. Battista Adult cancer prevention in primary care: patterns of practice in Québec. , 1983, American journal of public health.