Exaggerations and Caveats in Press Releases and Health-Related Science News

Background Exaggerated or simplistic news is often blamed for adversely influencing public health. However, recent findings suggested many exaggerations were already present in university press releases, which scientists approve. Surprisingly, these exaggerations were not associated with more news coverage. Here we test whether these two controversial results also arise in press releases from prominent science and medical journals. We then investigate the influence of mitigating caveats in press releases, to test assumptions that caveats harm news interest or are ignored. Methods and Findings Using quantitative content analysis, we analyzed press releases (N = 534) on biomedical and health-related science issued by leading peer-reviewed journals. We similarly analysed the associated peer-reviewed papers (N = 534) and news stories (N = 582). Main outcome measures were advice to readers and causal statements drawn from correlational research. Exaggerations in press releases predicted exaggerations in news (odds ratios 2.4 and 10.9, 95% CIs 1.3 to 4.5 and 3.9 to 30.1) but were not associated with increased news coverage, consistent with previous findings. Combining datasets from universities and journals (996 press releases, 1250 news), we found that when caveats appeared in press releases there was no reduction in journalistic uptake, but there was a clear increase in caveats in news (odds ratios 9.6 and 9.5 for caveats for advice and causal claims, CIs 4.1 to 24.3 and 6.0 to 15.2). The main study limitation is its retrospective correlational nature. Conclusions For health and science news directly inspired by press releases, the main source of both exaggerations and caveats appears to be the press release itself. However we find no evidence that exaggerations increase, or caveats decrease, the likelihood of news coverage. These findings should be encouraging for press officers and scientists who wish to minimise exaggeration and include caveats in their press releases.

[1]  E. Weitkamp,et al.  Agenda Building In Media Coverage of Food Research , 2014 .

[2]  Philip M. Newton,et al.  When Medical News Comes from Press Releases—A Case Study of Pancreatic Cancer and Processed Meat , 2015, PloS one.

[3]  Barbara C. Burrell.  Constructing Public Opinion , 2002 .

[4]  Joseph Hilbe.  Generalized Estimating Equations, Second Edition , 2012 .

[5]  Steven Woloshin,et al.  Influence of medical journal press releases on the quality of associated newspaper coverage: retrospective cohort study , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  Andy E. Williams.  Environmental News Journalism, Public Relations and News Sources , 2015 .

[7]  Lisa M. Schwartz,et al.  The Media Matter: A Call for Straightforward Medical Reporting , 2004, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[8]  Petroc Sumner,et al.  The association between exaggeration in health related science news and academic press releases: retrospective observational study , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  Clare Williams,et al.  UK science press officers, professional vision and the generation of expectations , 2015, Public understanding of science.

[10]  Bob Franklin,et al.  A COMPROMISED FOURTH ESTATE? , 2008 .

[11]  Anders Hansen.  The changing uses of accuracy in science communication , 2016, Public understanding of science.

[12]  B. Goldacre,et al.  The quality of the evidence for dietary advice given in UK national newspapers , 2012, Public understanding of science.

[13]  Gary Schwitzer,et al.  How Do US Journalists Cover Treatments, Tests, Products, and Procedures? An Evaluation of 500 Stories , 2008, PLoS medicine.

[14]  J. Hardin,et al.  Generalized Estimating Equations , 2002 .

[15]  Isabelle Boutron,et al.  Misrepresentation of Randomized Controlled Trials in Press Releases and News Coverage: A Cohort Study , 2012, PLoS medicine.

[16]  Jean M. Brechman,et al.  Lost in Translation? , 2009, Science communication.

[17]  Brian Leveson.  An inquiry into the culture, practices and ethics of the press , 2012 .

[18]  G. Gamble,et al.  Media Coverage, Journal Press Releases and Editorials Associated with Randomized and Observational Studies in High-Impact Medical Journals: A Cohort Study , 2015, PloS one.

[19]  Steven Woloshin,et al.  Press Releases by Academic Medical Centers: Not So Academic? , 2009, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[20]  M. Ramsay.  Measles: the legacy of low vaccine coverage , 2013, Archives of Disease in Childhood.