Prevalence of intramammary infection in Dutch dairy herds

A survey was carried out in 2003 in 49 dairy herds to determine the overall and pathogen-specific prevalence of intramammary infection (IMI) in Dutch dairy herds, and to compare the distribution with four studies performed from 1973 to 1985 in The Netherlands. Herds were randomly selected stratified over the 12 Dutch provinces, had at least 40 lactating cows and participated in the Dutch milk recording system. Quarter milk samples were collected from all 408 cows with a somatic cell count (SCC) ⩾250 000 cells/ml and 145 heifers with SCC ⩾150 000 cells/ml at the last milk test before the farm visit. Additionally, samples were collected from 519 (approximately 25%) of the remaining low-SCC cows and heifers with a SCC at the last milk test before the farm visit of <250 000 and <150 000 cells/ml, respectively. Bacterial growth occurred in 37·3% of milk samples of high-SCC cows and in 21·1% of low-SCC cows. Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) were the most frequently isolated group of bacteria (10·8% of quarters) and were found in all herds. Prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus IMI was lower in 2003 than in 1973, respectively 1·8% and 6·2% of quarters. Prevalence of Streptococcus uberis and Str. dysgalactiae IMI was almost the same in the five samplings during the 30-year period, at 1·1–1·7 and 0·9–1·5%, respectively. Str. agalactiae was not found in this study. Prevalence of CNS IMI was higher in lactating heifers, while prevalence of Str. uberis, Str. dysgalactiae and penicillin-resistant Staph. aureus IMI was higher in older cows. Because distribution of pathogens changes over time, herd-level samples for bacteriological culturing must be taken regularly to monitor udder health. Additionally, national mastitis prevalence studies give important information through monitoring the national udder health status.

[1]  H. Barkema,et al.  Prevalence and herd-level risk factors for intramammary infection with coagulase-negative staphylococci in Dutch dairy herds. , 2009, Veterinary microbiology.

[2]  K. Dhuyvetter,et al.  Influence of variable milk quality premiums on observed milk quality. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[3]  H. Stryhn,et al.  The effect of season on somatic cell count and the incidence of clinical mastitis. , 2007, Journal of dairy science.

[4]  L. Green,et al.  Survey of the incidence and aetiology of mastitis on dairy farms in England and Wales , 2007, Veterinary Record.

[5]  W. Heuwieser,et al.  Prevalence of mastitis pathogens and their resistance against antimicrobial agents in dairy cows in Brandenburg, Germany. , 2006, Journal of dairy science.

[6]  R. Zadoks,et al.  Invited Review: The role of cow, pathogen, and treatment regimen in the therapeutic success of bovine Staphylococcus aureus mastitis. , 2006, Journal of dairy science.

[7]  O Reksen,et al.  Milk culture results in a large Norwegian survey--effects of season, parity, days in milk, resistance, and clustering. , 2006, Journal of dairy science.

[8]  V. Myllys,et al.  Bovine mastitis in Finland 2001--prevalence, distribution of bacteria, and antimicrobial resistance. , 2004, Journal of dairy science.

[9]  P. Ruegg,et al.  Results of milk samples submitted for microbiological examination in Wisconsin from 1994 to 2001. , 2003, Journal of dairy science.

[10]  David J. Wilson,et al.  Monitoring udder health and milk quality using somatic cell counts. , 2003, Veterinary research.

[11]  R. Zadoks,et al.  Clinical, epidemiological and molecular characteristics of Streptococcus uberis infections in dairy herds , 2003, Epidemiology and Infection.

[12]  H. Allore,et al.  Cow- and quarter-level risk factors for Streptococcus uberis and Staphylococcus aureus mastitis. , 2001, Journal of dairy science.

[13]  M. Green,et al.  A study of the incidence and significance of intramammary enterobacterial infections acquired during the dry period. , 2000, Journal of dairy science.

[14]  H. Barkema,et al.  Management practices associated with the incidence rate of clinical mastitis. , 1999, Journal of dairy science.

[15]  G Benedictus,et al.  Management practices associated with low, medium, and high somatic cell counts in bulk milk. , 1998, Journal of dairy science.

[16]  H. Saloniemi,et al.  Bovine Mastitis in Finland in 1988 and 1995 - Changes in Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance , 1998, Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica.

[17]  D. Wilson,et al.  Bovine mastitis pathogens in New York and Pennsylvania: prevalence and effects on somatic cell count and milk production. , 1997, Journal of dairy science.

[18]  T. Lam,et al.  Epidemiological characteristics of bovine clinical mastitis caused by Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli studied by DNA fingerprinting. , 1996, American journal of veterinary research.

[19]  R J Harmon,et al.  Physiology of mastitis and factors affecting somatic cell counts. , 1994, Journal of dairy science.

[20]  R. Gonzalez,et al.  Shedding pattern of Staphylococcus aureus from bovine intramammary infections. , 1990, Journal of dairy science.

[21]  H. Wisselink,et al.  Dutch national mastitis survey. The effect of herd and animal factors on somatic cell count , 1989 .

[22]  C E Franti,et al.  Prevalence of udder infections and mastitis in 50 California dairy herds. , 1988, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[23]  Sander Greenland,et al.  Modern Epidemiology 3rd edition , 1986 .

[24]  F. H. Dodd,et al.  Control of mastitis in the dairy herd by hygiene and management. , 1969, Journal of dairy science.