Validation study of numerical simulations by comparison to measurements in piston-driven shock-tunnels

The simulation of high enthalpy flows, both experimentally and numerically, is a topic of international research efforts. It is important to understand and quantitatively describe the aerothermodynamic phenomena of high speed/high enthalpy flows in order to develop more capable reusable space transportation systems. A CFD-method is used here to model several piston driven shock tunnels used around the world to experimentally study re-entry and supersonic combustion phenomena. The results are compared to measured data (pressure and shock speed) of the various tunnels and shows that the approach is valid and is ideal for the development of new tunnel operating conditions and new tunnels. Using the numerical models, test facilities are compared to each other. For the medium enthalpy condition presented here, the tunnels produce similar test conditions, with the bigger ones having greater levels of nozzle supply pressure relative to the diaphragm rupture pressure, and greater test time.

[1]  M. Laster,et al.  The G-range impulse facility - A high-performance free-piston shock tunnel , 1992 .

[2]  K. Sato,et al.  Experimental study on the tuned operation of a free piston driver , 2000 .

[3]  R. J. Stalker,et al.  Development of a hypervelocity wind tunnel , 1972, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[4]  Hans G. Hornung,et al.  Role and techniques of ground testing for simulation of flows up to orbital speed , 1990 .

[5]  Russell R. Boyce,et al.  Mass spectrometric measurements of driver gas arrival in the T4 free-piston shock-tunnel , 2005 .

[6]  Hans G. Hornung 28th Lanchester memorial lecture. Experimental real-gas hypersonics , 1988 .

[7]  E. Hirschel Basics of Aerothermodynamics , 2004 .

[8]  Peter A. Jacobs Quasi-one-dimensional modeling of a free-piston shock tunnel , 1994 .

[9]  Peter A. Jacobs L1d: A Computer Program for the Simulation of Transient-Flow Facilities , 1999 .

[10]  Ali Gülhan,et al.  Mars entry simulation in the arc heated facility L2K , 2002 .

[11]  F. Wubs Notes on numerical fluid mechanics , 1985 .

[12]  Peter A. Jacobs,et al.  End-to-end modelling and design of a new operating condition for HEG , 2004 .

[13]  Russell R. Boyce,et al.  Comparison of Supersonic Combustion Between Impulse and Vitiation-Heated Facilities , 2000 .

[14]  Russell R. Boyce,et al.  Development of some hypersonic benchmark flows using CFD and experiment , 2003 .

[15]  Russell R. Boyce,et al.  Measurement of recombination rate parameters in nonequilibrium supersonic expansions of ionized argon and neon , 1991 .

[16]  T. Grundy,et al.  Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics , 2001 .

[17]  Rg Morgan,et al.  The University of Queensland free piston shock tunnel T-4: Initial operation and preliminary calibration , 1988 .

[18]  J. J. Gottlieb,et al.  Numerical investigation of high-temperature effects in the UTIAS-RPI hypersonic impulse tunnel , 1991 .

[19]  Russell Robert Boyce Computational fluid dynamics code validation using a free piston shock tunnel , 1995 .