Environmental consideration of dairy wastewater treatment using hybrid sequencing batch reactor

In this study, biological treatment of dairy wastewater industry was investigated. Two units, conventional sequencing batch reactor (CSBR) and hybrid sequencing batch reactor (HSBR) were -1 -1 operated, with the same source at organic loading rates (OLRs) of 1.75, 2.33, and 3.50 g COD L d . The seed sludge was collected from a treatment plant situated in an Egyptian Starch, Yeast and Detergents Company. The operating sequence of both CSBR and HSBR systems consisted of five steps: fill (2 h), react (aerobic: 19 h and anoxic: 1 h), settle (1 h), draw (0.5 h) and idle (0.5 h). In 2- 3 the hybrid system, plastic balls with specific surface area of 900 m m and porosity of 94% were randomly equipped at the bottom of the reactor. Results showed that, in the two reactors, the chemical oxygen demand (COD) and total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) removal efficiencies decreased with increasing OLRs. However, better performance was observed in the hybrid system. In the -1 -1 HSBR, at increasing the OLR from 1.75 to 3.50 g COD L d , COD and TKN removal efficiencies decreased from 98 to 92% and from 92 to 83%, respectively. Similarly, in the CSBR, removal of COD decreased from 88 to 76% and removal of TKN decreased from 71 to 54%, at the same range of OLR. Moreover, the hybrid system obtained higher specific substrate utilization rates (0.096-0.13 -1 -1 h ) and biomass growth yield coefficient (0.25-0.67 g VSS g COD), as compared to the CSBR. Good performance of the HSBR was explained by the wide variation of microbial community dominated in the system, including suspended heterotrophs and attached nitrifiers. The conventional treatment systems could be upgraded to handle higher organic loads by adding packed media in the biological units.

[1]  R. Borja,et al.  Kinetic analysis of the psychrophilic anaerobic digestion of wastewater derived from the production of proteins from extracted sunflower flour. , 2002, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[2]  R. Canetti,et al.  Long-term evaluation of a sequential batch reactor (SBR) treating dairy wastewater for carbon removal. , 2007, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[3]  G H Dibdin,et al.  Mathematical Modeling of Biofilms , 1997, Advances in dental research.

[4]  T. Setiadi,et al.  Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) production from tapioca industrial wastewater treatment: Influence of operating conditions on PHA content , 2012 .

[5]  M. Loosdrecht,et al.  Maintenance, endogeneous respiration, lysis, decay and predation , 1999 .

[6]  Xiaochang C. Wang,et al.  Performance of a hybrid membrane bioreactor in municipal wastewater treatment. , 2010 .

[7]  OPTIMIZATION OF TUNISIAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT - THE KELIBIA CASE , 2011 .

[8]  I. D. Mall,et al.  Sequential batch reactor for dairy wastewater treatment: Parametric optimization; kinetics and waste sludge disposal , 2013 .

[9]  M. Lübken,et al.  Optimizing sequencing batch reactor (SBR) reactor operation for treatment of dairy wastewater with aerobic granular sludge. , 2008, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[10]  E. Neczaj,et al.  Sequencing batch reactor system for the co-treatment of landfill leachate and dairy wastewater , 2008 .

[11]  Suntud Sirianuntapiboon,et al.  Sequencing batch reactor biofilm system for treatment of milk industry wastewater. , 2005, Journal of environmental management.

[12]  Mahmoud Nasr,et al.  Modelling and simulation of German BIOGEST/EL-AGAMY wastewater treatment plants – Egypt using GPS-X simulator , 2011 .

[13]  Giorgio Mannina,et al.  Modelling and dynamic simulation of hybrid moving bed biofilm reactors: Model concepts and application to a pilot plant , 2011 .

[14]  Mahmoud Nasr,et al.  Application of Artificial Neural Network (ANN) for the prediction of EL-AGAMY wastewater treatment plant performance-EGYPT , 2012 .

[15]  G. L. Sant'anna,et al.  Aerobic treatment of wastewaters in a three‐phase fluidized‐bed bioreactor: A comparison of two types of polymeric supports , 1994 .

[16]  Jianlong Wang,et al.  Wastewater treatment in a hybrid biological reactor (HBR): effect of organic loading rates , 2000 .

[17]  J. Martín-Pascual,et al.  Effects of scale-up on a hybrid moving bed biofilm reactor – membrane bioreactor for treating urban wastewater , 2013 .

[18]  A. Ledin,et al.  Suspended biofilm carrier and activated sludge removal of acidic pharmaceuticals. , 2012, Water research.

[19]  Monthon Thanuttamavong,et al.  Kinetic development and evaluation of membrane sequencing batch reactor (MSBR) with mixed cultures photosynthetic bacteria for dairy wastewater treatment. , 2010, Journal of environmental management.

[20]  H. Ødegaard,et al.  Performance of a hybrid activated sludge/biofilm process for wastewater treatment in a cold climate region: Influence of operating conditions , 2013 .

[21]  M. Wentzel,et al.  Experimental determination of the heterotroph anoxic yield in anoxic-aerobic activated sludge systems treating municipal wastewater , 2007 .

[22]  I. Lo,et al.  Removal of rate-limiting organic substances in a hybrid biological reactor , 1995 .

[23]  O. Yenigün,et al.  Anaerobic treatment of dairy wastewaters: a review , 2005 .

[24]  Hallvard Ødegaard,et al.  Innovations in wastewater treatment: the moving bed biofilm process. , 2006 .

[25]  Renu Bhargava,et al.  Effect of organic shock loads on a two-stage activated sludge-biofilm reactor. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[26]  S. Han,et al.  Membrane sequencing batch reactor system for the treatment of dairy industry wastewater , 2003 .

[27]  Juan M. Garrido,et al.  An innovative biofilm-suspended biomass hybrid membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment , 2005 .

[28]  A Benítez,et al.  Sequencing batch reactor as a post-treatment of anaerobically treated dairy effluent. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.